Others


OTHERS

==ON THIS PAGE:


1) The concept "Others"
2) The name "KWAUSO"
3) Audio-visual statement in Italian concerning  the centrality of      Shroud of Turin for this project.
4) The Book, KWAUSO Thanks the Lord for the Shroud
5) KWAUSO School song:
  i) Lyrics and ii) Instrumental.

1) The concept "Others"
The word "Others" appearing as the title of this page expresses two things:

1) It is a place where all the other relevant topics not covered under the available topics on this School project website can be found.

2) This page briefly examines the meaning of KWAUSO School Project as an attempt to pay attention to the condition of other people. Therefore as title of the page the word "others" carries the sense it has in the phrase, "Education for responsible Service of Others".


2) The name "KWAUSO"

The word"Kwauso" is created by bringing together two words in Kiswahili language where,

"KWA" could mean "to", "for", or "through".
"USO" simply means "Face". The new word stands for the meaning, "Through and to the honor of the Merciful Face of Our Lord"


Such a name suggests a dimension that goes beyond the considerations of mere philanthropy.   


Elsewhere the word USO was used as a title of a book in Kiswahili (pictured below) that examines facts and opinions about the controversial image on the Shroud of Turin. The two later books Zawadi-Kumbukumbu, 2002 and Tuitazame Alama Ile Kuu, 2020 (also pictured below)  by the same author examine the same subject. Before this image millions of people, including Pope John Paul II, feel deeply attracted to think of the suffering of their brothers and sisters.  Once, Pope John Paul II had the following to say about it: “For every thoughtful person it is a reason for deep reflection, which can even involve one’s life… Before the Shroud, how can we not think of the millions of human beings who die of hunger …of the millions of human beings who live in hardship and humiliation on the edges of great cities, especially in developing countries?”

Click this link> www.ichrusa.com/saintsalive/obsturin.htm



 

Some people will look at this Face
 and then leave,
 but not without an unresolved puzzle
continually recurring to their mind:
“Who is this man?”
Others will look at him,
 and after a long gaze
at the suffering he endured
 they will joyfully hold on gazing even longer
 with a fascinating understanding
 in their heart:
 That
 It is the Lord
 calling them away from themselves
to serve others
 as he did.

3) Audio-visual statement in Italian concerning  the Centrality of      Shroud of Turin for this Project.








4Gratitude to Our BenefactorsThe Book, KWAUSO Thanks the Lord for the Shroud.


i

Dedication

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To all those

who, in their desire to thank the Lord for his infinite mercy and love for us

contemplate the icon of his suffering, death and glorious resurrection

which appears to us as an inexplicable selfie in the Shroud;

 And to every individual

who, spiritually or materially has offered their generosity

in the creation of KWAUSO Secondary School.

 

 

ii 

 Contents

 

 Contents

Dedication………………………………………………………………………….            i

Contents....................................................................................................................             ii

Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………          iii

Preface by Prof Giulio Fanti, Padova........................................................................          iv

Introduction and  A Thematic Summary Display......................................................            v

Part I. The Shroud: Enigmatic Witness under Scientific Inquiry…………….............        1

Part II. A Sequel of Gazing at the Shroud and An Ensemble of Gratitude Tokens .....       49

Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………..98

Apendix I. More Symbols at KWAUSO…………………………………………….99

Appendix II: A Passing Turbulence in Flight……………………………………….101      

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 iii

Acknowledgements

 

I am grateful to each and everybody who has assisted me in writing this book. My first thanks go to Our Lord who has shown me the way to appreciate the mystery of the Shroud which has formed my way of looking at things by contempating this mystery. In the second place I thank my Diocesan leaders who over the years have allowed me to try doing something to promote the cause of the Shroud starting with the kind encouragement from the late Bishop Nestor Timanywa, who welcomed my idea of writing my first book on the Shroud in the Kiswahili language, Uso: Utafiti Kuhusu Uwezekano wa Picha ya Mateso ya Kristu, shortly after my return from for studies in Philosophy, 1992/93 and later allowed me to pursue my dream of doing KWAUSO Secondary School as a response to the prompt of the Shroud of Turin to think of turning my eye to the fact that we live in a world with people in varying life situations some of whom need our greater attention than other.

 

I thank the Shroud researchers and all the people who have done so much to bring to light the facts we all need to understand, at least to some measure, the mystery of the Shroud. Without their work this book would have never been written. I am particularly thankful to the people who have provided me with some of the pictures related to the Shroud research appearing in this book including Alfonso Sanches, Barrie Schwortz and Emanuela Marinelli. I thank the individual friends who have allowed me to use their private pictures. Here I am thinking of friends like Philip and Paula Steele and their daughter Lucinda, Adriana Acutis, Mathew and Tamara Bruno, Monte and Harriet Alkire, Paula Freepartner, Frank and Amy Pala, Joy Morland, Chiara Molfese Pavan, Maria Grazia Franco, Kris Applebee, David Kraft and others.

 

I thank all the people who, motivated by their kind generosity to look beyond the bounderies of their own needs have, each in their different ways,  contributed from what belonged to them towards the building of KWAUSO Secondary School which in turn gives relevance to the talk contained in this book. I thank the cloistered nuns of the Poor Clares Monstery of Itahwa, the KWAUSO School community and many other people elsehwere who have been supporting me with their prayers.

 

I pray that the Lord will bless them all.

 

Fr. Stanislaus Mutajwaha.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 iv

PREFACE

By Prof. Giulio Fanti, Padova

The wo

The words appearing here as a Preface to this book were sent to me as a personal letter in the Italian language by Associate Professor Giulio Fanti, one of the world most respected scientific Shroud researchers working with the Department of Industrial Engineering at the University of Padua in Italy. The letter is Professor Fanti’s answer to the question I addressed to him regarding his opinion of the Shroud as an active scientist after more than 25 years of investigating the mystery of the Shroud particularly the aspect of its Image formation.  His original words will come after my translation.

 


Dear Fr. Stanislaus Mutajwaha,

I thank you for what you have written to me.

You request me to write two lines concerning what I think about the Holy Shroud and now here below I bring you some conclusions derived from my over 25 years of scientific studies particularly those pertaining to the most important Relic of Christianity.  With all these years of study over my shoulders and thanking the Holy Spirit and Jesus himself who have enlightened me on this subject, I am sure that the Holy Shroud is the very cloth that wrapped the body of Jesus Christ, the risen One.  This Relic is Jesus’ identity card that I acknowledge in agreement with Pope Benedict XVI as “A mystery of the Cross and the Light”.

 

It is a mystery of the cross because it allows us to understand how much and to what extent Jesus has suffered for us human beings and for our salvation. Analysis of the blood imprinted on the Sacred Linen is leading me to grasp the inconceivable reality of the sufferings endured by this Man before his death.

 

It is a mystery of Light because there is encoded within it the proof of the Resurrection which is gradually emerging even from the scientific point of view.  The 1988 carbon-14 dating results which declared the material of the Shroud to be of medieval origin will be debunked by being shown to be false for soon is coming the first physical proof of the Resurrection.

 

In fact, one of my scientific publications appearing in the Journal of World Scientific News already gives hints pointing to this conclusion.

 

So then, what is the ultimate meaning of the Holy Shroud?  The Shroud is a divine gift; a symbol of the Resurrection.  As St. John Paul II says, “… when everything crumbles down… even within ourselves…Christ remains our unfailing support”, and I would add, for our immortal soul clothed in a mortal body.

 

With best regards,

Giulio Fanti.

 

The original letter:

=================================

Carissimo Padre Stanislaus Mutajwaha,

la ringrazio per quanto mi ha scritto.

Lei mi chiede di scrivere due righe su quello che penso della Sacra Sindone e qui sotto le riporto alcuni pensieri derivanti da più di 25 anni di studi scientifici e non solo, sulla Reliquia più importante della Cristianità.

Dopo tutti questi anni di studi, ringraziando lo Spirito Santo e Gesù stesso che mi hanno illuminato sull'argomento, sono sicuro: la Sacra Sindone ha avvolto il corpo di Gesù Cristo risorto. Questa Reliquia è la carta d'identità di Gesù che definisco in accordo con Papa Benedetto XVI "Mistero di Croce e di Luce".

Mistero di Croce perchè ci permette di capire quante e quali sofferenze Gesù ha sofferto per noi uomini e per la nostra salvezza. L'analisi del sangue impresso sul Sacro Lino mi sta facendo capire l'inimmaginabile entità delle sofferenze subite da quest'Uomo prima della Sua morte.

Mistero di Luce perchè nel lino sindonico è codificata la prova della Risurrezione che via via sta emergendo anche dal punto di vista scientifico; il risultato errato della datazione al carbonio 14 del 1988 che ha dichiarato questo tessuto di origine medievale, sarà presto ribaltato poichè sarà la prima prova fisica della Risurrezione. Infatti già una mia pubblicazione scientifca sul journal scietifico World Scientific News fornisce i primi indizi su questo risultato.

Qual'è quindi il significato ultimo della Sacra Sindone? Essa è un dono divino, il simbolo della Risurrezione. In accordo con S. Giovanni Paolo II, "... quando tutto crolla ... anche dentro di noi ... Cristo resta l'indefettibile nostro sostegno", e aggiungerei, per la nostra anima immortale vestita di un corpo mortale.

Con i più cordiali saluti.

Giulio Fanti.

 

GIULIO FANTI Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua.

 

     

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 v

INTRODUCTION AND A THEMATIC SUMMARY DISPLAY

 

This book is not ready for publication as it lacks some technical elements which I still need time to add and make in order to make it open to the general public. Until that is done, it remains with the value of a logically unified set of private notes for perusal and sharing with my friends for whom it is primarily meant as my thankful token to the Lord and to them.  In the first place the book speaks about the Shroud of Turin, a cloth preserved in Turin, one Italian city located on the Northwest region of that country known as Piedmont since 1578 A.D.  The cloth comes to us as an enigmatic object that, as a witness of its own kind, veils and unveils truths about the greatest of all events in human history, namely the passion and victory of Jesus Christ. It is an object within sensible reality that however eludes the competence of the tools upon which human understanding of the sensible order depends. This cloth, which I was fortunate to see with my own eyes while on public display the year 2000 is believed by millions of people around the world including myself, to be the very garment that wrapped the body of Jesus Christ as he lay dead in the tomb till the resurrection, that moment of all moments in history that knows not any sufficient explanation. In the eyes of many, this is the cloth, though now old and frail that captured the event that no human eye was ever lucky to see.

 

Even though it is not written by a scientist, the book looks at the phenomenon of this enigma and proposes one relevant interpretation of its message in our concrete historical context, namely the School of KWAUSO as we stand stunned with great appreciation at the unexpected arrival of the recently beatified and soon to be canonized Carlo Acutis into our School project for children like he was at his passing.

 

Divided into two parts, the main body of this book comprises of 48 short essays on consecutive odd pages with collections of relevant pictures on the corresponding 48 even pages intertwined between them.

 

A)    The first part of our treatment examines the contention that THE SHROUD STANDS AUTHENTIC//IN THE OPINION OF SCIENCE AND//THE PERCEPTION OF BELIEVERS.  This previous sentence, in capitalized and boldened characters, is formed by serially arranging (and reading together) the initials of the first 24 captions of the essays appearing on the consecutive odd pages under the first part followed by the ending characters of the words of the same 24 captions; and then again serially arranging (and reading) the 24 initials of the second group of essay captions (again on odd pages) under the second part. 

 

Upon scrutiny the reader discovers that the sentence gives a summary of the essays which it encompasses namely that the Shroud is an event in the real order of sensible realities that can be studied and investigated through the scientific method. That done, the Shroud can also be accessed by the human intellect which, at least to some measure, is capable of discerning truths that lie beyond the realms of mere objectivity. Aware that even science has its boundaries and cannot claim absolute capacity of determining all truth, a pronouncement on anything based on its findings such as the authenticity of the Shroud must be made in a tone of humility. This justifies our use of the term “opinion” in the capitalized and boldened sentence above. Determination of absolute truth belongs to an authority that resides above science. Science can determine much but not all and therefore it must be accorded the respect that it deserves; not more.

 

B) The second part turns around the fact of KWAUSO Secondary, one attempt to translate the Shroud message of love and the self-emptying action of our Lord, the Man we all see in the Shroud, into a contextually relevant and urgently called-for response. It is a thankful recognition of the place of Providence in the making of KWAUSO which at different stages of its realization has witnessed tremendous amounts of generosity from many people in a surprising way climaxing in the totally unexpected arrival of Blessed Carlo Acutis into our project, that was conceived and intended to promote the Shroud of Turin by reaching out to the people we might possibly reach with its message of compassion and care.  This theme is summarized by the phrase: THANKS BLESSED CARLO ACUTIS.  Here again the reader notices that the words forming this phrase are the last letters of the ending words of the essay titles treated in the second part of the book read from top to bottom on the table of contents.

 

The book is written in the light that even though the Shroud requires the special expertise of the scientist to read and interpret it as an objective phenomenon, the weightier part of its meaning lies outside the competence of science. Science can only give scientific explanation of the Shroud. But, however fine and accurate scientific answers may be, they will remain unable to exhaust all the questions the human spirit poses about this artifact. Since the arrival of modern science, the Shroud has intrigued the scientist and still baffles the world of learning itself. But even now, it leaves the curiosity of the unsophisticated onlooker and the non-scientific audience unabated. The reason behind this is that for all of its frailty as a textile, the Shroud touches man, especially the believer, as a spiritual being and can even impact his social life as well depending on how the individual approaches it.  And that is exactly where an activity like a school, rooted in its contemplation can come in and find justification.  For that reason, the second section dwells on the foundation and sense of building KWAUSO Secondary School to the honor of the One whose image we can all see in the Shroud. The final pages offer us the place for expressing our gratitude to all who in one way or other have involved themselves in bringing about KWAUSO as our propitious opportunity to turn our eye on the needs of our brothers and sisters.

 

While I write this book, I am aware that that Church has not yet officially declared the Shroud the burial cloth of Jesus even though it encourages its veneration. This is a truth that can be substantiated by citing the unambiguous private veneration of the Shroud by practically all the popes of the last and present century. In agreement with them I cannot pretend to deny the fact that since I came into contact with the Shroud I have grown to like and even let me be profoundly inspired by it even if there is not a hint of it in the creed of the Catholic faith.  I became a priest under the guidance of the Catholic magisterium before I knew anything about the Shroud. I had faith in the one true God and everything spelt out by the creed of our Catholic faith. That faith still needs to grow. But I am happy that the Shroud does not contradict it. On the contrary it confirms it.

 

When the apostles heard that the Lord had risen, Peter and John wasted no time to run to the tomb. They went to the tomb to see with their eyes whatever they could find in connection with the wonderful news of the resurrection of their master. Their decision was not a mistake. Upon arrival, all that the apostles saw was an empty tomb and the Shroud plus other linens and went back happy. Till now, over two thousand years later, the tomb is still empty but the Shroud is in Turin. Having survived many dangers and all kinds of vicissitudes of history the Shroud waits for us to acknowledge its existence and respond to its message. There are myriad ways of responding to the message it sends. For some, including myself, the Shroud can be counted as an object that can enhance our pride of being believers in the risen Lord who really went through the most terrible suffering for the salvation of mankind, leaving behind a unique imprint of what he endured for posterity and for all of us. There is an inner warmth about contemplating the Shroud.  Incidentally the available data about the Shroud in the hands of science cannot allow the scientist to question the mental integrity of the believer who holds the Shroud as a valuable article. Neither does the believer have any reason to doubt the stability and firmness of his conviction that in gazing at the Shroud he/she is looking at a medium that directs our thoughts to the mystery of our Lord. And sure enough, the Church does not discourage us from drawing spiritual strength through our contemplation of Jesus’ love for humanity by gazing at it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part I: THE SHROUD, ENIGMATIC WITNESS UNDER SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY

1.TRIGGERED IN BY A MAGAZINE REPORT ABOUT THE PASSIO CHRISTI

3.HOOKED ON BY DATA AS OPPOSED TO INSTINCTIVE NEGATION

5.ENTHRALLING IMAGE: SAGA OF AN IMPOSSIBLE ARTIFACT

 7. SERENE FACE OF GREAT MAJESTY IN DEATH

9.HIDDEN MYSTERIES IN A PRE-MODERN ERA SELFIE

11.ROMAN CRUCIFIXION: HINTED BY COIN OF CAESAR TIBERIO

13.OVERHWELMING NUMBER OF WOUNDS BY A TERRIBLE WHIP

15.UNPACKING THE CASE OF A MAN SIMILAR TO THE BIBLICAL INRI

17.DEATH AFTER HORRIBLY EXCRUCIATING AGONY AND HUMILIATION

19.SECONDO PIA’S SUPRISE PHOTOS AND POLLEN REVELATIONS BY MAX FREI

21.TRACKING THE PROVENANCE OF THE SHROUD AND THE SUDARIUM OF OVIEDO

23.A VICTIM OF TORTURE AS ATTESTED BY THE HIGH LEVELS OF BILIRUBIN

25. NOT A PAINTING NOR A SCORCH YET EVOKING PILATE’S ECCE HOMO

27. DERIDED, SCORNED, MOCKED, FLOGGED, CRUCIFIED AND CUT OFF

29. SIDE PIERCED BY LANCE WHILE BACK LACERATED BY SCOURGES

31.ACCREDITED BY TRADITION AND DEFENDED BY THE AGNOSTIC

33.UNSOLVED BY THE STURP SCIENTISTS AT SAN GIOVANNI

35.THREE DIMENTIONAL DATA ENCODED IN THE IMAGE

37.HEAD CUPPED WITH THORNS FOR ABYSMAL PAIN

39.ENTOMBED JEWISH STYLE; HIS FEATURES SEMITIC

 41.NEW LINEN APT FOR A HIGH PRIESTLY TRIBUTE

  43.TEMPORARY BURIAL IN THE LAND OF JUDEA

           45.INCORRUPTIBILITY SNAP-SHOTTED ONTO THE LINEN

47.CARBON-DATED MEDIEVAL IN 1988 BY A TEST NOW DEBUNKED

 Part II. A SEQUEL OF GAZING AT THE SHROUD

AND AN ENSEMBLE OF GRATITUDE TOKENS

"IL DOPO LO SGUARDO ALLA SINDONE"

49.TOUCHED BY AN ICON WITH INNOCENT BLOOD OF ONE WOUNDED IN THE HEART

51. HEALED IN ORDER TO FORSTER AND PROMOTE OTHER PEOPLE’S INTEGRAL HEALTH

53. EXAMINING THE CALL TO COMMITMENT BY THE SHROUD IN THE CONTEXT OF TANZANIA

55.PONDERING THE PROSPECTS OF A SCHOOL AS AN APT SEQUEL FOR EXECUTION  

57.ENKINDLED BY MEMORIES OF FR. PETER RINALDI’S PRAYER YEARS BACK

         59.RAYS OF COMPASSION RENDING THE HEARTS OF SHROUD GAZERSS

          61.CHRIST WITNESSED BY SELFLESS COMMITMENT:  A NEW GARB

              63.EDUCATE THE YOUTH AT A GOSPEL FLAVORED SCHOOL

                 65. PLAN A TIMELINE WHILE LISTENING TO PROVIDENCE

         67.TWENTYONE UNEXPECTED PRE-SCHOOL LITTLE ANGELS

                 69.INITIATIVES SECURED BY CONSISTENCY AND THE TRUST OF DONORS

                 71.ORIGINAL CONCEPTION FIRMLY BUTTRESSED ON THE WINGS OF HOPE

            73.NURTURING A CARING CULTURE FOR A BROTHER OR SISTER IN NEED

             75.OPENNESS AND AVAILABILITY TO THE CHALLENGE OF THE RELIC

            77.FIX THE KEENER EYE ON THE LESS FORTUNATE IN THE AREA

         79.BUILD HEARTS NOW FOR GREATER PROSPERITY LATER

         81.EXCELLENCE OF ASPIRATION CAPTURED BY SYMBOL

      83. LEARNING A LIFE OF SERVING OTHERS AT KWAUSO

      85. INDEBTED TO EXTOL OUR BEFACTORS: LYRICS AND ARIA

      87. ECHOES OF JUBILANT GRATITUDE TO A RHYTHM OF MUSIC

         89.VIVA ADRIANA ACUTIS FOR A GEM OF A CHURCH THROUGH YOU

         91.EXULTATION TO GOD FOR BRINGING CARLO ACUTIS INTO OUR PROJECT

       93.REVERBERATE A PRAYER FOR OUR WELL-WISHERS IN CHORUS A TUTTI

        95. SING A THANKFUL HYMN TO PROVIDENCE FOR ALL THESE FAVOURS



Part I: THE SHROUD, ENIGMATIC WITNESS UNDER SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~01~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000


1. TRIGGERED IN BY A MAGAZINE REPORT ABOUT THE PASSIO CHRISTI

1)     Awareness: My awareness of the existence of the Shroud came all unexpected. It was in the Easter week of 1985. During those days I was working in the Diocesan Minor Seminary known as Rubya.  It was a kind of Seminary routine that after the seminarians had celebrated Easte at the Seminary as a community they would be allowed to go home for a week-long vacation. That left the teachers the freedom to visit their friends and families if they so wished. This is the time I went to visit a confrère in a not very distant Parish and spent some two nights there.

 

I now regard that visit providential. Perusing through the books and journals in the Parish library my eye hit upon an article written a few years earlier on in June 1980 by one Vernon Miller of the Brooks Institute, California in the National Geographic Magazine. The article was about the Shroud of Turin. This is the thing that triggered me into my hitherto unquenched thirsty to understand what the Man we see in the Shroud wants to tell us. It was through this article that I got to know for the first time ever that there was such a thing in existence. The article was already old and it might have been regarded an archival[H1]  material for those who had already read it, but for me it was breaking news. As I read through the article about a linen sheet in a town known as Turin, Italy on which was an imprint of a human form reminiscent of the passion of Jesus Christ, (Passio Christi) as recorded in the Gospels, my feelings became split. My instinctive opinion was that, the story could not be true; It sounded to me like a curious tale – nothing more. Ironically the obstacle lay in my seemingly long time in the priesthood. By that time, I was going through my eighth year in the priesthood. The question forced itself in: How could it be possible that me, with so many years in the priesthood I was not at least remotely aware of the existence of this object that speaks about so wonderfully things concerning the Jesus I talk about every day?

 

2)     Doubt: So, in a way the strongest reason for my reluctance to accept the Shroud was that I had heard nothing about it during my seminary days.  I know, my teachers had given me the best they had. To my way of thinking, I was now always wondering why practically all of them had kept silent about this thing if they believed there was any sense in it. The answer occurred to me that none of my teachers in the Philosophicum and in the Theologicum was assigned to teach Sindonology. That being the case, it was obvious that none of them was to blame. Their silence was no proof that they had no idea about the Shroud. When assigned to teach in the Seminary, you do not go there and begin saying whatever you have in your head or begin feeding your students with what appeals to your likes. In the Seminary, just like elsewhere in the field of academics, time is normally precious. You will do the best if you respect the syllabus and that way respect your students’ time and do them justice. But now, leaving the past behind us to take care of itself, if the Shroud is what I now believe it is, I wonder if it would not be proper to introduce a brief course in the Seminary about the Shroud. Science cannot be saying such marvelous things about Jesus while the young priest is left totally uninformed about them.

 

3)     Inner Joy: In any case, while my head, (for no reason I could produce) told me that the message contained in that article was unacceptable, my heart liked what I read.

 

So, at the end of my reading, I found myself caught up between two choices, namely either to throw away the article into the junk bin for the reason that I lacked the required willingness to accept what it said or to reread it so as to make sure that the attraction that had caught my heart at the first reading of it was not baseless. Between the two options my pick was to reread the article. But even at the end of this second reading, my head was still bombarded with more questions and stronger doubts even though at the same the attraction of the narrative did not diminish. Then I decided to postpone my final verdict about the matter to a third reading, later in the evening. The hours that elapsed between the second and the third reading that was yet to follow saw me in the mood probably reminiscent of doubting Thomas upon hearing the report about the resurrection of Jesus from the mouths of his fellow apostles. Probably to Thomas’ ear the report of the resurrection sounded too good to be true.

 

4)     Towards formation of a personal opinion: When evening came, I read the article again more attentively.  By retiring time, the queries and doubts were still dominating in my head while the inner warmth about the possible meaning of what I had read still remained unchanged. That sense of ambivalence concerning this matter kept on smoldering within me for weeks and months after that day. But it was not to last forever. June the same year I was assigned to teach in one Major Seminary known as Ntungamo. While there, Providence led me into acquaintance with Fr. Peter Rinaldi one of the directors of the Shroud Guild in America, who was also close to the group of Shroud Researchers known as STURP (The Shroud of Turin Research Project). By mail he supplied me with the continuing publications of the Shroud Guild Newsletters, pamphlets and books that brought stronger light into my Shroud quest.

 

In July 1988 I got the opportunity to do further studies in Philosophy in Rome. There I kept in good contact with Fr. Rinaldi who besides some important books including Ian Wilson’s classic, The Shroud of Turin kept me updated.  I was also lucky to come in touch with some sindonologists including Professor Maria Marinelli. Hearing these people talk and share about the Shroud helped me start forming my own opinion that the right way to approach the Shroud is to keep proper attention and respect to the objective data gathered by the competent researchers about it rather than be driven by some instinctive negativity.

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~02~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 


The Shroud as it appears to the naked eye: Sensible and credible even if enigmatic.

An encounter of the message of incorruptibility in a frail piece of ancient cloth.

Sure comfort to the believer but a stumbling block to the avowed skeptic.

 

 

 

 

Two images can be seen. From center towards left the eye sees a faint ghostly image,  head first, then chest, then arms crossing at wrist length; then thighs and legs. That is the first image.  Then again for the second image: From center towards right the eye seees a the back of the head,then the shoulders, followed by the back, then thighs and legs.

                                                                            

  Interest in the Shroud is no sign of lack of faith:  At being told by his friends that Jesus had risen, the Apostle Thomas instinctively doubted his colleagues’ veracity only soon later to confess the risen Christ in the words “My lord and my God”. And then, the past transpired, the believing Thomas did not hesitate to spend his entire life witnessing Jesus’ supremacy and crowning it all by paying the ultimate price for Our Lord in the act of irreversible martyrdom.

 

The painting above shows Jesus allowing the doubting Thomas to use his senses of sight and touch to make his assessment of the truth about the resurrection of the incarnate Lord. He saw with his own eyes his wounded side and touched the Lord with his hands to remove his doubts. Merciful Jesus did not revenge Thomas’s incredulity. He welcomed him lovingly. He in fact utilized Thomas’ doubt to further strengthen the faith of the other Apostles who had already accepted the truth of the resurrection. They too looked on as Jesus helped Thomas to cross the line of unbelief. They did not close their eyes to protect the purity of their faith as though sight were its the antinomy.  In a similar way, a person who gazes at the Shroud cannot be judged lacking in the faith. The Shroud is not meant to help the unbeliever alone. It could be held as a reference of the certitude of the strongest believer as well. Therefore, the believer needs not to shy away from captivating interest in the Shroud.

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 3. HOOKED ON BY DATA AS OPPOSED TO INSTINCTIVE NEGATION   

1) The Shroud at the first glance:  Basically, the Shroud is an old linen cloth measuring 4.36m long by 1.10 wide (14’ 3” by 3’ 7”).  Probably those measurements do not seem sensible. But considered from the point of view of one ancient Middle East measurement unit, the Syrian the cubit known to have been common during the times of Jesus, the cited metric and British measurements correspond to 8 cubits by 2 cubits. The Shroud weighs 2.45 kg.

 

What first steals the eye of the new onlooker is one set of parallel lines of dark scorch marks interrupted at regular distances with whitish triangular formations which are patches sewn onto the Shroud. Between the parallel lines can be seen two images, frontal and dorsal of the same man estimated to be between 30-40 years of age with apparently blood marks of a crucified man allover his body. The images look like photographic pictures on non-photographic material leaving the onlooker wondering whose images these could be. According to the Archeologist William Meacham this man is estimated to weigh between 75-81 kg. His height is between 175-180 cm (cf. William Meacham, The Authentication of the Turin Shroud: An Issue in Archeological Epistemology, University of Chicago Press, 1983) – Shroud.com).  The Shroud was brought to the attention of science by the photographs of one lawyer and amateur photographer Secondo Pia in 1898. 

 

2) Instinctive negation: But once the faint images are seen and carefully examined a natural question presents itself follows: Could these images be regarded as paintings? Whether drawings or not, of whom could they be? For, examined through the eyes of the expert, what is seen here is a man brutally scourged and tortured; a man crowned with thorns; a man crucified and while dead pierced in the side letting out a flow of blood and water while hanging on the cross. For anybody who has some knowledge of the gospel narratives, what we see in the images evokes the story of Jesus. But strange enough, once it is affirmed even if in the tone of a mere hypothesis, that the man here could probably be Jesus, the proposal is met with the most instinctive negation. Unfortunately, that is also how my first reaction was and I do not know how to explain it.

 

I am not alone. It could be held as a good guess that a good number of the present ardent believers in the Shroud were not much different from me. First glance experience favors negation. Deeper concentration settles the more reasonable understanding of the matter in the opposite direction. Cases of individuals who persistently remain adamant ton their first glance conviction do exist. But that is part of our concrete human existence. History reports that when Delage, Professor in Anatomy at the Sorbonne Institute after a thorough study of the photographs of the Shroud determined that the Man in the Shroud is Jesus of Nazareth the whole academic Institute instinctively jeered at him. Yet, till now the world does not seem to have a more accurate answer.   

 

2) Tested by fire: The scorch marks and white patches on the Shroud were sawn there by the Chambery Poor Clare nuns the year 1534 following the fire that had broken up on December 4, 1532 at night burning the chapel made purposely to preserve the Shroud, known as the Sainte Chapelle du Chateau des Ducs de Savoie. That fire almost destroyed the Shroud kept in a silver casket. By the time the rescuers reached the place, the casket had already started to melt along the top edges. The fire was quickly extinguished but a drop of molten silver had just fallen on one corner of the rectangular folded Shroud inside the casket burning through it. The Shroud was lightly charred along one edge. On examination after the rescue, the unfolded Shroud was found damaged in eight areas corresponding to the corner that had been touched by the molten silver. The charred edge showed in two parallel lines connecting the burn holes.   The triangular patches remained there for centuries till 2002 when they were removed “to restore the Shroud”.  It is between those parallel lines that two shadow-like images, frontal and dorsal are unmistakably visible from a not too close distance.

 

Besides the 1532 Chambery fire, attested by the presence of the large patches and charred lines, the Shroud carries a testimony of a prior fire that caused four sets of little L-shaped holes.  The artist who must have noticed their presence on the Shroud reproduced them on his copy of the Shroud on what has come to be referred to as Hungarian Pray Codex between the years 1192-95. They must have been burnt into the Shroud in a fire that has not been recorded, probably during a ritual event. That could have been the first fire to be associated with the Shroud. A third fire occurred on 11 April, 1997. This time again the fire broke (to continue on the following page, below the pictures).

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

              

    In the past the Shroud was kept above the alter in the Gurarino           Casket in which the Shroud was brought from

Guarini Chapel, above.                                                                             Chambery to Turin in 178.

                        

Above, left: Mario Trematory (left) rescues the Shroud-containing box during the 1997 fire. Above, right: Now the Shroud is secured in a special inert gas case, under controlled temperature pictured here.

   (Continued from pg 12, above)              

up at night between the Royal Palace and the Turin Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in a place where the Shroud was kept, threatening its total incineration. It was rescued through the indomitable courage of one fire fighter called Mario Trematore using a sledge to break the bullet proof glass behind which a box containing the Shroud lay. Trematore later confessed: “God gave me the strength to break that glass”.

 

 3. Conviction comes by stages: The Geographical Magazine article that opened my eyes the year 1985 concerning the existence of the Shroud of Turin was an attractive report of serious facts concerning one hitherto unknown artifact. But, strange enough at the same time the article triggered inside me a kind of instinctive rejection of the very possibility of the existence of this object. The article awoke me up from my ignorance and ignited a fire of deep interest within me. Yet, I cannot say that I became right away convinced that the Shroud was authentic. My immediate fascination was quickly mitigated by doubts and negative questions.  While studying in Rome between 1988 and 1992 I visited Torino, knowing that I would not be able to see the Shroud as there was no public exposition going on there. I simply went believing that by being in the place where the Shroud is kept, I would feel some kind of satisfaction being in the vicinity of an object that speaks great things to millions of people in the world. Yet again, I cannot say that it was that trip that brought me to the conviction that the Shroud is genuine. In the year 2000 the Shroud went on public display and my friends from Cavenago di Brianza in Milano, Giulio Erba and Agnese Fumagalli offered me a return air ticket and arranged that I could travel from Tanzania so I could see the Shroud on public exhibition in Turin with my own eyes. The trip was a big success. A small bus was hired and in a group of about twenty people we made our pilgrimage from Cavenago to Turin. In Turin we all saw the Shroud and rejoiced. Then we drove back home to Cavenago, all motivated.  Nevertheless, I cannot say that my inner conviction about the authenticity of the Shroud was triggered by my seeing it for the first time on that occasion, since by that time the conviction was already there. 

 

That means,there isn’t a single event or point of time that I can cite in isolation as my turning point from my instinctive resistance to acceptation. It was rather a continual attraction of the Shroud that drew me into the conviction. It will be shown in the next essay that as time passed, my hesitation to accept the Shroud fell apart. The numerous findings, attested by competent scientists and professionals in other fields, brought me to the point such that prolonged refusal could not but leave me interiorly culpable of intellectual dishonesty and irresponsible rejection of a gracious invitation to create room in my life to contemplate an important gift – a seemingly impossible artifact but very real and so enthralling.

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~05~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

5.ENTHRALLING IMAGE: SAGA OF AN IMPOSSIBLE ARTIFACT 

                1) Facts and puzzles: The proposition, “Facts call for interpretation” rings to the ear as an almost axiomatic pronouncement. When an extraordinary object presents itself to us, our intellect gets provoked as it were, to find a place where it fits within the intellect’s general picture of things. The Shroud is no exception. It comes to us as a set of remarkable data to be explained.  But, unlike most of the things around us the Shroud, tangible and visible though it is, seems to elude all efforts to exhaustively explain. Many believe that this is the cloth that wrapped the body of Lord as he lay in the tomb. While that offers the easiest explanation to it, the Shroud still remains enigmatic, revealing itself as a mystery, that could leave anybody enthralled for its complexity and simplicity. When I read about it the first time the year 1985, I was captured by its dignity yet felt overwhelmed by a sense of doubt. When I finally saw it in 2000 during its public exposition, I was enthralled even the more. Now all doubt is gone with just one big question left on my mind: Can mortal human flesh comprehend the reason why God willed to make the Shroud that wrapped the body of his Son as he lay in the tomb, with a touch of his divine artisanship such that no human can replicate it even today?

 

                    2) Opportunity for all: By just starting from the consideration of God’s divine goodness towards the human being, it is possible to understand that this God could allow the Shroud to come into existence even for the sake of those whose faith is not very strong. The weak ones can make use of it. It might be the case that the Shroud will not lead every agnostic to conversion but, it is interesting to hear stories of people who were far away from the faith but have eventually been attracted to the truth of the Gospel through their encounter with the Shroud. Even those whose faith is strong enough can still make use of the Shroud.  On the next page we shall see the two consecutive popes of our time, John Paul II and Benedict XVI praying in front of the Shroud.  Their decision to venerate the Shroud on their knees speaks volumes to their onlookers.

 

3) Like the sign of Jonah: As Pope John Paul II said, “the Shroud is a challenge to human intelligence”. Before it, the mind can carry someone to the limits. A thought about the meaning of Jesus’ words presents itself.  It is written in the Gospel of Mathew, “Then some of the scribes and Pharisees spoke up. ‘Master’, they said ‘we should like to see a sign from you’. He replied, ‘It is an evil and unfaithful generation that asks for a sign.  The only sign it will be given is the sign of the prophet Jonah’”. (Mt. 12:38-39). Biblical scholars and exegetes have good explanation of the meaning of these verses.  But if the Shroud eludes the explanation of science, would it not be legitimate to consider it as the thing that in its own way fits in as the sign of Jonah – an object in the order of man’s concrete experience pointing to the inscrutable power of Jesus? It would make anyone think that, in his boundless goodness, Jesus had in his design something good even for an evil and unfaithful generation, calculated to wake them up from their stubbornness in their unbelief. Jesus cares even for someone who is inclined to close his eyes at him. For those who see Jesus’ sign in the Shroud, only a simple step is needed.  Jesus said to his followers “When I am lifted up from the earth, I will draw all people to myself” (Jn 12:32).  While it is obvious that the man of faith does not need the Shroud as a foundation of his or her faith, it might probably be argued that, for someone else whose faith is cold and faltering, the Shroud has the chance of bringing at least some amount of warmth into those fading shadows of it that are there.  Such an effect cannot be counted too negligible.

 

4) My take: While in Rome, when time came for me to write my doctoral thesis as a concluding statement to my philosophical search for the truth, I felt strongly urged to connect my statement to the Shroud. So, I formulated the title of my thesis and took it to our professor in Research Methodology hoping that if he accepted it, I would ask him to be my moderator. My proposal was: The Hermeneutical Aspect of the Shroud of Turin.  The professor turned it down for the reason that he was not sufficiently informed about the Shroud to moderate it responsibly. Then I decided to change my topic. The new topic was this: Some Recent Insights in the Philosophy of the Other. What prompted my second choice was my conviction that the Man in the Shroud could be seen as a sufferer for others. I proposed this topic to Professor Rev. Fr. John Battista Mondin, the Philosophy Faculty Academic Dean. He accepted the topic and agreed to be my moderator. As the work went along, Mondin enjoyed what I wrote. Being aware that my doctoral thesis was not directly addressing the Shroud, I made sure reference was made of it all the same in my word of dedication. So, I formulated the first sentence of the dedication of my thesis like this: “To all those who in order to know the truth seek His Face without losing heart”.  By the words “His Face” I meant the countenance of the one whose representation we all see in the enigmatic Shroud of Turin. After publication of the thesis, Professor Mondin made a step further and arranged with some official in the Vatican that I could take a copy of my thesis and present it to the Holy Father, Pope John Paul II. I knew he liked the Shroud. It was great joy for me when the plan materialized.

 

5)     After gazing at the Shroud:  So if in a way my Doctoral thesis could be regarded as my first response to my gaze at the Shroud, the second one would soon later be my publishing of my first two books about it in Kiswahili namely (1 Uso: Utafiti Kuhusu Uwezekano wa Picha ya Kifo cha Kristu and 2) Sanda ya Torino: Zawadi Kumbukumbu) while the third is the thought of seeking the ways and means of Building KWAUSO Secondary School in Bukoba Diocese. When some four years ago I was asked to record a word on video in Italian about the way I look at the Shroud, I cited this school as a concrete attempt in response to our gaze at the Shroud describing the project as: “Il dopo lo sguardo alla Sindone” (A sequel or a response to the gaze at the Shroud”). By that I intended to bring out the idea that any authentic encounter with the Shroud will not leave the beholder unchallenged to go out and have something crucial changed in their inner life and do some kind of compassion to the honor of the Man we see in the Shroud, so serene, inviting and attractive, as will be seen in the following section.

6)     

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~06~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

 

7)     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                            

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                       Pope John Paul II kneels in prayer before the Shroud.

 

                                                                                                                                      

                                 Pope Benedict XVI                                                                                                           

 

While aware of being keeper of the keys entrusted to St. Peter and charged by the Lord with the mandate to strengthen his brothers in the faith, each of these consecutive popes of the digital age in his own turn venerates the Shroud: Pope John Paul II (first picture above) and Pope Benedict XVI (second picture above). Both can be seen on different occasions kneeling in prayer before the Shroud. Any thoughtful person could ask themselves: Why this?  Surely the Popes are not stage actors. The message their veneration of the Shroud is supposed to send is definitely something more than anything light. The implication is that, far from risking becoming heretical, the believer who seriously holds the Shroud as an object with a lot of meaning in his/her faith life enjoys encouragement from the highest guardians of the faith who regard the Shroud worth of such profound veneration.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~07~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

7. SERENE FACE OF GREAT MAJESTY IN DEATH

 

1)     No product of human imagination:  History has it that for the earlier part of its recorded existence the Shroud appeared as a piece of cloth on which was imprinted a mysterious face image.  The cloth was referred to as the Mandylion while the image was given a descriptive name “Acheiropoietos” a term meaning “not made by hands”. The acheiropoietos looked like an image of a human face but probably the people then, like us today, did not know exactly how it had come into being or how it could be replicated by the technology available to them.

 

 Researchers in the history of the Shroud now found in Turin agree that the ancient Mandylion and the Acheiropoietos are one and the same thing as Shroud of Turin. Looking at the face in a photographic negative, the contemporary viewer is able to see what the ancient counterpart was unable to decipher. With the tools available to us we can see the man in much greater clarity and detail.  The face is of a true human being, serene in death.  

 

2) Image of a real human being. When science first examined the Shroud image the discovery was that: this is a real human being. It was the atheistic anatomy professor Yves Delage who as a professional confirmed this. It is not a painting but a real image of a human body. Many medical experts after him including Pierre Barbet and Robert Bucklin concur that the image is anatomically correct.  It is in no way a product of human art.

 

The man we see in the Shroud has undergone a violent death.  The face itself is beaten and bruised. It has been harshly treated.  Yet, contrary to every expectation of a person that has been so ill-treated, his face remains serene even in death bearing no sign of accusation of his torturers. All and everything forgiven. As we behold this face, the words of Jesus ring back to our mind: “Father, forgive them; they do not know what they are doing”. (Lk. 23:34). In this image, we see the lips that would have uttered such words. Our mind is led to think of him who was transfigured on Mount Tabor in the presence of his disciples and “his face shone like the sun” (Mt 17:2).

 

2)     A poet before the Shroud: I love James Brabazon’s words cited by Ian Wilson: (Cf. The Shroud : Fresh light on the 2000-Year-Old Mystery,

Bantam Press, Corgi edition 2011. p. 381.

 

“This was the look of him? This down-to -earth man?

This convinces me. None of the flimsy faces

The painters put on him. “This man never arrived,

At resurrection without a hard-won fight,

Nor was half air before he achieved ascension.

With him he took a look of the earth he lay in –

Rock, and little soil, and old olive roots –

A sturdy, serene man, common sense in a riddle.

He looks like his talk, before it was pared by parsons,

Spun into sermons, and so on, transtabulated

Into theology.  This man is marvelous –

Death instinct with life, life at peace,

This is  man.”

 

3)Astounding serenity: The serenity in the face of this man, despite the suffering he has gone through is in itself a miracle in its own right. It is a miracle that humanity cannot allow to simply fade away into oblivion. It is a miracle of mercy in a portrait that could always serve as a reminder to all of us of Jesus’ story of his self-emptying act for the sake of sinners, as the next essay will tell.

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~08~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 


 

                                                         The Shroud face, as seen in the Shroud.

 

 

 


 

The Shroud Face as seen in a photographic negative.

 

Archetype of drawings and artistic renditions of Jesus’ face.

 

 

                    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~09~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

9. HIDDEN MYSTERIES IN A PRE-MODERN ERA SELFIE

 

1)    A zipped treasure of hidden information: The Shroud is like a zipped treasure of information about a unique event in the history of mankind.  It is a puzzling selfie that disturbs the person who holds it to be such.  That it is a selfie is too obvious to debate.  For in the first place there is no doubting that here we have a true image of a human body that is wrapped in the cloth. The image is imprinted onto the cloth from within, thus excluding the possibility of someone else acting from outside to cause it and make it appear the way it is seen. To make things appear even more stunning, the individual who is “photographed” is lying there with all marks that confirm his death at the moment of the snapshot. So, it is a selfie of a material body, occupying space in time like all bodies do. But then an imponderable question seems to force itself in: If this is a selfie and a selfie of someone who lies in death, is the selfie from our side of life or from the other?  Simply stated: Is the selfie a supernatural one or natural. If it is a natural selfie, we shall need an explanation. If it is a supernatural one, all questioning may be closed.

 

2)    A selfie before the birth of technological imaging:  All those who looked at the Shroud before May 28, 1898 the night when the advocate Secondo Pia took the pictures with his camera, the image on the Shroud appeared as an inexplicable shadow of a human form on a linen cloth. The truth that this image is comparable to a photographic negative up to a certain extent came to light as Secondo Pia’s photographic plates went through the normal film developing process in his dark room. There took place an inversion of color such that the black/dark points on the Shroud turned white/bright in the image on the plate, while the white/bright points on the Shroud now became black/dark. Meantime, the lateral inversion caused by the lens of the camera in projecting the light from the Shroud onto the glass plate produced its normal consequences whereby the clearly visible and definite body form in the plate image appeared all opposite to the shadow on the Shroud. The left side on the shroud went to the right in the picture on the glass-plate. But it is worth noting: Blood marks on Shroud that appear darkish on the Shroud now appear whitish on the glass-plates as expected in a normal black-and- white photograph.

 

3) Most striking properties: The STURP team main photographer for the 1978 120-hour non-stop examination of the Shroud, Barrie Schwortz identifies a number of striking properties. To grasp the precise scientific meaning and implications of these would require explanation by a competent expert in the fields of photography, physics and chemistry. What we can do for the purposes of this book is simply mention some of them.

i) The Shroud image is of a monochromatic coloration. (cfr. www.shroud3d.com)

 ii) Superficiality: “the image is present only on the uppermost two or three fibrils of the threads.

iii) No directionality. This excludes the possibility of an artist drawing the image by using a brush. A brush stroke during the painting would have left some indication of movement from point to point.

iv) X-Ray properties. Study indicates that the formation of the involved more than the visible light because it reveals some information of things even beneath the skin of the body which suggests energy that was capable of penetrating the body unlike the ordinary light.

v) Absence of outlines. One does not clearly see where the image begins and where it ends.

vi) Anatomically correct. This is a property that “excludes a process of image-formation by direct contact”.

vii) Imageless areas. Tests indicate that in the areas of blood there is no image. This is interesting in that it shows that the image was formed after the blood was on the Shroud and not vice-versa.

viii) Stability: The image does not dissolve or disappear under heat, water and ordinary solvents.

ix) 3D information is encoded in the image. Unlike all drawings or camera made photos, the Shroud image contains mathematical information that can help the researcher to determine the distance between any point of the body wrapped in the Shroud and the Shroud. Consequently, it is possible to determine accurately the shape and size of the body of the man in the shroud. Hence, after meticulous work Professor Giulio Fanti in collaboration with his team of scientists was able to reproduce a statue of the Man who was wrapped in the shroud in 2018; a man who evidently had been executed through a Roman style of crucifixion as will be seen in the next essay.   

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~10~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

                     

 

(2) Picture of the Man of Shroud as seen in the VP8 Image Analyzer. First seen by the Physicists Dr. John Jackson and Eric Jumper  in 1976.

 

 

 

The 3-D information encoded in the Shroud image enabled Professor Giulio Fanti and his team to create a perfect statue of the Man of the Shroud as seen above.

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~11~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

11. ROMAN CRUCIFIXI0N HINTED BY A COIN OF CAESAR TIBERIO

1) Designed for slaves and notorious criminals: The Man in the Shroud died a violent death by crucifixion.   A nail is used to fix one extended arm onto a crossbeam and then another nail for the second arm. The beam is known as the patibulum. The condemned is made to lie and extend his arms over the patibulum. The nailing of the arms to the patibulum is done while the wooden plunk lies down. The nails are hammered mercilessly through the wrists at a point known as the Space of Destot. By experience and expertise Roman soldiers knew that fixing the man on to the beam with nails through the writs eliminated all risk of the crucified slave or culprit falling off the cross.  This beam together with the man fixed onto it would be lifted and joined to the vertical piece already secured in the ground. The result is a kind of T- formation.  The vertical piece was called the stipes.    The condemned could remain hanging there as long as he managed to breath. This death was meant for slaves and notorious culprits, people who had no civil rights, rebels and traitors.

 

2) Capital punishment by crucifixion: Though lavishly used by the Romans crucifixion was not invented by them. Crucifixion came from the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Persians and the Carthaginians. Alexander the Great is known to have used crucifixion extensively in his ambition to expand his empire. Seemingly the Romans copied this kind of execution from these cultures and started using it the third century B.C. It is thought by scholars such us Pier Baima Bollone that this method of killing was designed to avoid the mental trauma of killing a fellow human being face to face.

 

3) A refined methodology of crucifixion: This evolved over years of use such that the executioner would know precisely how to do the dirty job successfully also incorporating the extra details of increasing or diminishing the amount of pain that the victim would be subjected to. For such purposes for example crucifixion by nailing, a method that ensures more intensive pain before a faster death might be taken as an option instead of roping the victim on to the cross which subjects the condemned longer time before death takes over. Even though, depending on the conditions of the crucified and treatment he went through, death might delay for even as long as four days. The evangelists report that Jesus expired in about three hours of his crucifixion.  In the Roman empire crucifixion was abolished by Emperor Constantine in the fourth century. The man in the Shroud was crucified by someone who knew well where the nail must be driven through, namely the wrist area exactly at the spot anatomy identifies as the Space of Destot.  Hung by the palms the condemned quickly falls off the cross as the palms are not able to support to support the weight of the crucified. When the nail is driven through the wrist the body stays on the cross. But that will damage the medium nerve causing excruciating pain to the victim. By the same action, the thumb reflexively folds into the palm. In the case of the Man in the Shroud both thumbs remained in the folded state till death arrived. They continued folded after the death until rigor mortis (rigidity of the body organs after death) set in. For that reason, on the Shroud the thumb is not seen. It is hidden in the palm.

 

For the Man in the Shroud scourging preceding the crucifixion. This was not done in accordance with the Jewish law. The Jewish law did not allow a fellow human being to be beaten above 39 lashes. But the Man seen in the Shroud was treated more harshly.    “If the one who is in the wrong deserves a flogging, the judge must have him laid on the ground and flogged in his presence, the number of strokes proportionate to his offence.  He may impose forty strokes but no more; otherwise, by the infliction of more… your brother be humiliated before you” (Deut. 25:2-3). He would be stripped of his clothes before being fixed on the cross and left there to die in that state (just as written of Him, Wis 2:20)“Let us condemn him to a shameful death, since God will rescue him – or so he claims”.

3)     Hint of coin on the right eye lid: When the 1931 picture of the face of the Shroud taken by Giuseppe Erie was put into the VP8-Image Analyzer by Physicists John Jackson and Eric Jumper the year 1976 at Sandia Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (cf. https://www.shroud.com> The VP-8 Image Analyzer) it was realized that the Shroud image is three-dimensional. Closer observation showed that a coin-like looking object was visible over the right eyelid. Further studies of this matter revealed that it was a real coin of Tiberius Caesar, which gives a hint that this man was given a Jewish burial not earlier than the reign of the Caesar Tiberius, emperor of the Roman empire from 14-37 A.D.  The Roman lepton coin was minted by Pontius Pilate in the year 29 A.D.  It is the time of Jesus. The presence of the coin is an indicator that the Man in the Shroud was buried according to the customs of the Jews. To some extent, the presence of the coin on the Shroud corroborates the contention that the Man in the Shroud is Jesus Christ whose execution involved a breach of the Roman law. The Roman law stipulated that someone guilty of something grave could be punished by beating and be set free after the flagellation. A criminal condemned to death by crucifixion could be beaten as he was escorted to the place of crucifixion. Strangely, Jesus served both punishments. He was subjected to flagellation meant for criminals not supposed to be crucified. After being scourged, he was also sent to the cross to be crucified as seen in the following essay.

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~12~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

 

                                                                     

 

 

Fixing the victim on cross, the nail is driven      No bone is broken. But the median nerve is

through the Space of Destot in the wrist.            damaged causing the thumb to fall into the palm.

 

 

 

 

A protruding object over the left eye was seen by John Jackson and Eric Jumper. It was interpreted to be a coin, minted by Pontius Pilate the year 29 A.D.

                                                        

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~13~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

13.OVERHWELMING NUMBER OF WOUNDS BY A TERRIBLE WHIP

1) A showcase of mercilessness: Examining the Shroud image, forensic experts determine that the body of the victim seen in the Shroud is covered with hundreds of wounds and contusions inflicted by what they can determine to be a Roman whip. The whips were made so that at every blow little chunks of flesh could be ripped out from the body so causing the maximum pain in several points every time the blow landed. Careful study reveals patterns of groups of these bruises. Further analysis leads to the inference that the wounds were not caused by random beating. Two Roman soldiers were involved.

 

During the scourging the victim’s hands were chained on a pillar. Standing on his feet the victim took the posture of slightly bending forward with the back left exposed to the cruelty of the torturers. One of the torturers worked from the left of the victim while the other one stood on the right. Seemingly each of the soldiers enjoyed the freedom to do the beating without a fixed limit of blows he could give. Jewish law prohibited beating a fellow human being beyond 39 lashes.  But the body of the victim in the Shroud is covered with very many scourge marks which permits a count of not less than 120 blows.  According to some experts including Professor Giulio Fanti most accurate count set the number at least 370 signs of wounds on the Shroud resulted from the beating. At the end of the scourging the victim’s body was completely lacerated with wounds.  

 

2)The flagrum taxilatum:   An instrument of torture, variously known as the flagrum taxilatum   or  plumbum is a Roman scourge designed to inflict the most terrible pain to the victim.  Several ropes (say two or three) or leather straps are tied on a handle at one end. At the loose end of each of these is tied a bone of an animal like a sheep or metal spike. The metal ending is capable of causing two contusions or openings in the skin of the victim.

 

3)Why this? The scientist who is capable of counting the number of the blows this Man endured is probably not able to give us the answer as to the justification of all this brutal treatment from what he observes in the laboratory. Yet any person with a normal heart cannot fail to wonder why all this happened to this man. The believer will think of seeking for the answer from the prophecy of Isaiah which says:

 

“Yet ours were the sufferings he was bearing,

Ours the sorrows he was carrying,

While we thought of him as someone being punished

And struck with affliction by God;

Whereas he was being wounded for our rebellions,

Crushed because of our guilt,

The punishment reconciling us fell on him,

And we have been healed by his bruises” (Isa. 53: 4-5).

Those dreadful instruments were designed for a purpose. They were not simply used to kill but to torture and humiliate the victim. They were meant for slaves and non-citizens. In a joint paper about this point is noted by Flavia Manservigi and Enrico Morini that “The Roman criminal law distinguished those who could be flogged: in the age of the Republic, Roman citizens were protected by specific laws, which forbade to carry on scourging against citizens…unless the crime was very serious, like in the cases of betrayal of the fatherland…patricide, attempt to restore monarchy… Violence against Vestal Virgins” p. 4 (in Footnotes) cf. www.shroud.com PDF  The hypotheses about the Roman Flagrum: Some Clarifications by Flavia Manservigi and Enrico Morini at the St. Louis Shroud Conference  October 9th-12, 2014.

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

(The Roman whip: Flagrum taxilatum – Plumbum …)

                                                                 

      

 

-       A terrible Roman whip was used to flog this man. Its name: Flagrum taxilatum                     

 

Two executioners beat the man. The taller one was on the left of the Man. He concentrated his whips on the upper part of the body.  The shorter executioner was on the right. His beating mostly went to the lower part of the tall victim. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~15~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

15. UNPACKING THE CASE OF A MAN SIMILAR TO THE BIBLICAL INRI  

 

1)INRI: The acronym INRI was created from the words written by Pontius Pilate to summarize the information regarding the identity of the crucified Jesus and the reason for his punishment.  It is the Identity Card of Jesus. As the scriptures attest, “Pilate wrote out a notice and had it fixed to the cross; it ran: Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews” (Jn 19:20). It was inscription was in Latin “Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum side by side also in Hebrew and Greek for all to read and grasp the gravity of alleged crime of the crucified. John, the eyewitness, recorded the allegation as written by Pilate who passed the judgment, while the truth of the matter would be vindicated by history and the Shroud is a zipped account of what actually took before and after the execution of judgement. Studying the Shroud is like unpacking the entire case.

 

2)Who could this Man be? The number of serious scientists and professionals of impeccable integrity who in their respective fields of specialization have studied the Shroud either directly or indirectly is huge. Even if they do not all agree that the Shroud is the actual burial cloth of Jesus, the majority of them admit that there is a lot in the Shroud that corresponds to what happened to Jesus of Nazareth as recorded in the Bible. True searchers for the truth in the world of objectivity, these personalities affirm what their technique shows them and refrain from asserting what their methodology fails to support lest their word should mar their credibility. These people are neither naïve nor credulous. What they affirm today, their present doubter will defend tomorrow if the latter cares to abide by the rules of objective inquiry. For that reason, it is neither common religion nor any shared ideology that binds them together in handling their findings about the Shroud. No wonder, they range from agnostics to religious believers; from disinterested atheists to convinced theists of all creeds and denominations. When all these come together, their differences of beliefs notwithstanding, they speak the same language. They will all say “Yes” if it is “Yes” that is to be said, and they will say “No” if it is “No”. In the event that some of them find themselves saying “Yes” while their colleagues are saying “No” they sit together to examine the root cause of their variations and determine whether the matter is “Yes” or “No” for both parties. So it goes because truth is one. And the truth makes them free. 

 

3)Doors unlocked to science:The first credit will probably go to Secondo Pia a professional lawyer who as an amateur photographer took the first photos of the Shroud image in 1898.  It is these pictures that revealed to the world of science that in the Shroud there was hidden something more mysterious than meets the eye. When shortly later the pictures fell under the scrutiny of the French atheist Ives Delage, professor of Anatomy at the Institute of Sorbonne in Paris the signal was made known that the time for science to come in defense of religious truths had practically ushered in.  For Ives Delage, the anatomist credited for the first identification of the presence and function of the semicircular canals in the human ear, the Man of the Shroud is none other than Jesus Christ of the Gospels. Ives Delage was led to this conclusion by his three-year study of the anatomy of the Man of the Shroud. This confession was a shock to his fellow atheists. It was too bold of a pronouncement that exposed him to the danger of being evicted from his office at the Institute. Yet, despite all the risks, Ives Delage stood his ground.

 

But what did Ives Delage see in the Shroud as an accomplished anatomist of his time? Most probably not much different from what another French researcher Paul de Gaul observed: (Cfr. Le Visage de Jesus-Christ et son Linceaul, (France-Empire, Paris 1972), Tino Zeuli, Jesus Christ is the Man of the Shroud @  https:www.shroud.com>pdfs

 

1)     The Man of the Shroud was wrapped in a sheet.

2)      He remained there for a short time.

3)     He was separated perfectly from the Shroud , with a technic which has left the imprints of blood clots on the fabric without flicking or impairing these clots

4)     4) The Man of the shroud was fixed to the cross with nails…

5)     (5) On the Man of the Shroud are seen wounds of a crown of thorns.

6)     6) “The Man of the Shroud was pierced by a lance in the right side…

   (Cfr. The Shroud of Turin Website “Jesus Christ is the Man of the Shroud” @ https://www.shroud.com, pdfs).

In the light of all this information anybody who has read the Gospel narratives of the passion of Christ is left wondering if there could be any other man in recorded history who could better be identified with the Man in the Shroud than Jesus Christ himself. So, even at this elementary level of knowledge the instinctive conclusion is:  The Shroud is a picture that speaks about Jesus who was sent to the cross by Pontius Pilate and assigned the title, “Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews” or for short INRI a title not calculated to honor but to humiliate him as the next essay contends.

                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~16~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

                                                                                                              

Above left:  Raymond Rogers, chemist and leading expert in thermal analysis,  Accordig to Rogers the 1988 carbon-dating sample was not representative of  the Shroud.

Above, right. Professor Giulio Fanti who maintains: “I am sure that the Holy Shroud is the very cloth that wrapped the body of Jesus  Christ, the risen One”.

                   

Prof. Emanuela Marinelli with a shelf of her books. A world-famous sindonologist Prof. Emanuela Marinelli from

Italy has held many conferences about the Shroud during the course of which she also spoke about the KWAUSO School

project and solicited funds for the continuation of its construction from her audience. Doing that, Emanuela was assisted

by Doctor Salvatore Fiaschi, Observo Onlus, Rome.

 

When Professor Marinelli visited KWAUSO the year 2014 she gave us the precious of a precious gift of the Shroud

Replica for which we have built a beautiful Shrine at KWAUSO.

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~17~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 17. DEATH AFTER HORRIBLY EXCRUCIATING AGONY AND HUMILIATION

 

1)Dead for sure: Pathological studies carried out by many physicians and specialists in the field of medicine including Yves Delage, Pierre Barbet, Pier Baima Bollone, Sebastian Rodante, and Robert Bucklin and many others still concur that the man of the Shroud is dead. Signs of his death include rigor mortis of his members; presence of post mortem blood, a heart pierced by a lance (called “lancea” in Latin) that was thrust into the chest as he hung upon the cross leading to a flow of blood the heart by gravity followed by water looking blood serum.

 

3)     Humiliated for being good: On the whole the punishment was calculated to humiliate the victim. The humiliation is attested by the bush of thorns on the head meant to ridicule him as king wearing a crown and the very fact that he was suspended on the cross. To intensify the mockery, he was crucified by using nails through the wrists and feet to make him feel all the possible pain that could be inflicted on a living human flesh with a healthy and properly functioning nervous system. And yet, here is the man who abhorred all evil both moral and physical so much that while he walked the streets and pathways of the towns and villages of the people who did this to him, he could not bear leaving their requests for healing unattended. Which cripple did he not enable to walk? Which blind did he not restore to sight? Which hungry person did he not feed for no cost and so on…? Yet, this is the man who died accused but for none of his fault; the man who was denied of everything possibly acceptable.

 

Some medical experts such as Dr. Pierre Barbet contend that one of the signs of the sufferings this man went through was a psychic trauma. That dreadful thought about the impending suffering was so intense that profuse sweat mixed with blood escaped from his sweat pores drenching his skin.  Medical language calls it haematidrosis. Variously called Hematohidrosis or hemidrosis it is physiological process that could be described  as “a condition in which capillary blood vessels that feed the sweat glands rupture, causing them to exude blood, it occurs under conditions of extreme physical or emotional stress” (cf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

 

For the concrete case of Jesus, Luke the Evangelist writes: “In his anguish he prayed even more earnestly, and his sweat fell to the ground like drops of blood” (Lk 22:44). This occurred in the garden of Olives before the arrival of the guards who came to arrest him. What followed that can be found in Gospels. Forensic studies confirm that the sufferings and the pains he was brought to bear from the beginning till the moment he breathed his last had no limits.

 

4)     All alone: Jesus’ accusers spat on his face to show their opinion of him as a despicable being in front of them. Some blindfolded him and asked him to tell who beat him. The passers-by laughed as he sagged out of pain on the cross. They dared him to come down from the cross as his pain became more and more unbearable. They rejoiced seeing the man who had fed thousands of people with bread in a deserted place and changed water into the best wine at a wedding in Cana of Galilee failing to get a drop of water quench his thirst. There he was: all alone and desperately abandoned and helpless. Yet, here is the man whose movements from place to another were marked by throngs of people desiring even to touch his clothes. But now, no good of him was remembered. He was so humiliated. The man whom crowds had contemplated to make king is now covered with insult. The Shroud suggests that the Man we see in it has been greatly humiliated and has gone through terrible suffering. In the face of the similitudes between the two cases, the researcher will be interested in finding out if there is any identity connection between them. A study of the provenance of the pollen grains found on the Shroud on the one hand, and knowledge of the geographical background of Jesus’ ministry on the other can suggest a not unreasonable premise to build an argument on in order to establish their common home. The next two essays examine that question.

5)  000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~18~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ultra-violet light enables the scientists to determine that                    around the wound in the side there was blood and a serum that fluoresces. The heart was pierced. The man’s death in the cross is beyond doubt.

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                            

 On the cross. Covered with scourge wounds.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~19~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

19. SECONDO PIA’S SUPRISE PHOTOS AND POLLEN REVELATIONS BY MAX FREI

1) Photographic properties: The event that drew the attention of science to the Shroud took place in May, 1898 when the by then new technology of photography was applied to it by Secondo Pia in Turin. It was at the suggestion of a young Salesian priest Don Nogier de Malijai to King Humberto I of the Savoy Family of Kings the then legal owners of the Shroud. The occasion was a public exposition of the Shroud, arranged to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Savoy’s Family as kings of Italy. The technician to do the job was to be one young man Secondo Pia, professional lawyer and amateur photographer. Equipped with his photographic machine, the “camera obscura”, Secondo Pia who had not seen the Shroud earlier built a stage and performed his first attempt at night between May 24 and May 25, 1898. Due to the lighting difficulties and other technicalities, the attempt was not very successful.  He was permitted to make another attempt on 28 May.  (Cf. The Shroud: Fresh Light on the 2000-YEAR-OLD MYSTERY…, Transworld Publishers’, 20g11, pp 39-41). Man’s understanding of the Shroud changed when in the darkroom Secondo Pia saw the image he had captured on the photographic plates show up as a life-like image. The image that emerged from the developer was much clearer and more intelligible than the one that was immersed in it. With the lights and shadows reversed the new image became true to life.

 

The news of this spread rapidly as fire over a dry grassland. Many of those who heard about it doubted their reporters or questioned the integrity of Secondo Pia that he made a manipulated the chemicals to produce the new image appearing on the photographic plates. Others concocted all types of accusations against Secondo Pia for telling the world false information about the Shroud in the name of photography, a still new technology not understood by everybody.

 

2)Anatomically correct: One of the people who could not bear to accept the claims was one professor of anatomy at the Institute of Sorbonne in Paris, France known as Yves Delage, an agnostic. He demanded for the image for scrutiny. Upon obtaining them Yves Delage studied them as best as he could and after almost three years of study, he was led to the conclusion that they were undistorted pictures of a real human being who had been subjected to a death by crucifixion after being treated as Jesus as reported Gospels of the Christians. As a qualified anatomist he observed that the human form images of the Shroud were anatomically correct. One the greatest achievements in science credited to him is the discovery of the equilibrium-stabilizing function of the semicircular canals in the inner ear.

 

After the findings of Yves Delage had been thrown out, a very competent surgeon came in. This was Dr. Pierre Barbet who later summarized his findings in his book, A Doctor at Calvary: The Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ as Described by a Surgeon where he gives a forensic pathologist’s analysis of the Shroud largely depending on the evidence as revealed by the Shroud photographs taken by a professional photographer, Giuseppe Enrie in 1931. According to him all the information revealed in the Shroud is consistent with the facts known about the suffering and death of Jesus of Nazareth.

 

4)     Originating from Israel: Much later still, a famous forensic expert Max Frei Schulzer made investigation of the provenience and history of the Shroud by determining the geographical regions where the plants producing the pollen grains that have adhered onto the cloth over the thousand years of its history grow. By his findings the Shroud now preserved in Turin could easily be traced back to Jerusalem adding strength to the argument that the artifact could be traced to the time of Jesus Christ in the first Century Jerusalem.

 

Max Frei found out that on the Shroud there were not less than 56 different kinds of pollens grains. Of these 17 types grow in Europe. But all the remaining kinds grow outside Europe. Three quarters grow in Palestine. 16 types grow in desert places and salty regions. 16 grow in the region of Anatolia and Sanliurfa (ancient Edessa), Turkey, home of the Image of Edessa/Mandylion after the death and resurrection of Jesus (arrival during the reign of King Abgar V, 13-50 A.D till 944 A.D when it was received in Constantinople during the reign of Emperor Romanus Lecapenus (920-944) . 2 types grow in the area around Jerusalem. There are also pollens of plants growing around Istanbul formerly known as Constantinople. (Cf. Petrosillo and E. Marinelli, La Sindone, pp. 216-220; B. Bollone, Sindone o no, pp. 211-218). The presence of those pollen grains on Shroud gives strong indication that some time in its

history the Shroud must have been in Israel, the place of Jesus.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~20~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

                                            

1)         Secondo Pia poses  behid his photographic camera.            2)  Pia’s Camera obsura.                        3)  Photo negative of the Shroud frontal image.           https://shroud.com/images/FullColr%20web72dpi%20flipped.jpg

                                    Above: The Shroud as seen by any viewer in Turin.                                    Diapositiva05c

                                    Above: The Shroud seen in the negative photograph.  Seen for the first time by Secondo Pia in 1898. Discovery confirmed by Giussepe Enrie in 1933 with better picture due to developed photographic technique.

                                                     

 

                   Some of the different types of pollen grains identified by Max Frei Schulzer as embedded in the Shroud.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~21~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

21.TRACKING THE PROVENANCE OF THE SHROUD AND THE SUDARIUM OF OVIEDO

1)     Burden of Proof to the Historian: Once the hypothesis that two individuals A and B are twin brothers has been well demonstrated or proven correct, it is easy to draw the conclusion that those individuals come from the same mother. It is like an analytical inference. For years, one of the most difficult puzzles for the scientific Shroud researcher was to be able to pronounce with absolute certitude that the Shroud we see in Turin is the very cloth that wrapped the body of Jesus for burial during the reign of the Roman Emperor Tiberius, ruler of the Rome at the time of Christ. But more and more now, lots of information has emerged to make the researcher affirm with a comfortable confidence that the Shroud goes back to the time Jesus. The 100% coincidence of the blood stains on the face cloth that was lain over the head of Jesus covering Jesus face as he hung on the cross after his expiration and the Shroud face area provides one strong argument for the scientist to conclude that at one time the two covered the same face. That face cloth is known as the Sudarium of Oviedo. It is preserved in the Cathedral of Oviedo in Spain. Reason supported with evidence drives the researcher to the conclusion that what we call the Sudarium of Oviedo is the cloth that St. John reports to have been seen in the tomb after Jesus’ resurrection. “Simon Peter, following him, also came up, went into the tomb, saw the linen cloths lying on the ground and also the cloth that had been over his head; this was not with the linen cloths but rolled up in a place by itself” (Jn 20:6-7). It is interesting to note that, in the tomb, this cloth “was not with the linen cloths… but was rolled up in a place by itself”. This clarifies what we see: The enigmatic image is found on the Shroud alone. The face cloth (Sudarium) that was not in proximity with the body of the deceased does not have the image.  But since it is known that this cloth has been in Oviedo since the sixth century, it is easy to conclude that the Shroud’s history goes at least as far as that time. The burden of proof to contradict the confidence that the Shroud cannot not have been created in the medieval times remains thrown to Carbon-dating technician. 

 

2) Ancient indicators: For the major part, practically all of the evidence available about the most probably provenance of the Shroud when I first became aware of the existence of it was leaning to the time of Jesus’s earthly activity which is the first part of the first century.  Everybody could infer that the great historian Ian Wilson sees the matter that way too: “Throughout the greater part of this book we have put together a reconstruction of two thousand years of the Shroud’s history that is more comprehensive and more complete than anything done before.  Nevertheless, it is just that, a reconstruction, based on one simple premise: that the cloth we know today as the Shroud of Turin, which surfaced so mysteriously in France in the mid fourteenth century, is one and the same as the Image of Edessa, which began its life in Jerusalem in AD 30 and disappeared from Constantinople in 1204” (Ian Wilson, The Shroud: Fresh Light on the 2000-year-old mystery…, p. 370). So, the research Ian Wilson has made goes to suggest that the Shroud is traceable to the time of Christ.

 

3)Science still remains a human tool: For a long time, the world of Shroud researchers was waiting for a reliable pronouncement from archeology about the age of the artifact.  But it was not easy to get. The most reliable method of determining the age of an archeological artifact of organic origin was based on the spontaneous radio-active decay phenomenon of Carbon-14. Unfortunately using this method demanded destruction of quiet sizeable amount of sample for the test.  For that reason, even though the method (discovered by Willard Libby in the 1940’s)  was theoretically feasible and sufficiently reliable it could not be used for the Shroud. To use it, a large piece of the Shroud would have to be destroyed to determine the age of the remaining part. Common sense alone could not allow that to happen. Once the artifact is destroyed, it is gone. We remain with our memories.  But the world needs to keep the Shroud rather than determine the date of something no longer in existence. So, research had to be patient till the time when technology of dating was fine enough to require a very small sample. Such a method was finally discovered in 1977 under Professor Harry Gove of Rochester. It is called AMS (Accelerator Mass Spectrometry).  Unfortunately, when it was used to determine the Shroud’s age in 1988 amid errors of protocol and sampling, the results reached were a total fiasco.

 

4)Confirmatory evidence – Sudarium of Oviedo: But there is another strong evidence, ancient and still in existence. This is a piece of cloth known as the Sudarium of Oviedo. This is like a handkerchief; a face cloth or “sweat cloth”.  It is believed to have been wrapped around the head of Jesus between his death and burial. It is preserved in the Cathedral of Oviedo in Spain since the seventh century. The Sudarium of Oviedo measuring 83 cm x 53 cm is a cloth that wrapped around the head of Jesus’s body as the body was transferred from the cross to the tomb. The numerous blood marks from the bruised face of Jesus and the fluids flowing from the nose were caught onto the cloth forming a map of their origin.  Comparison between the marks on this cloth and those found on the face image of the Shroud leads some experts to the conclusion that the two must have covered the same face. It is claimed that not less than 90 points of coincidences can be confirmed through meticulous application of an overlay technique. The difference between the two cloths is that on the Shroud there is the mysterious unpaintable image which does not show up on the Sudarium. Otherwise, the blood/fluid marks on both coincide exactly. Since the Sudarium is known to have been preserved and venerated in Oviedo and has been Carbon-dated around the year 700 A.D. A further conclusion is that all that being true, the Shroud must have been in existence around the year 700 A.D. as well. Further evidence of this is that the blood on both clothes is of Group AB which is rather rare among the European races but rather more common among the people in the Middle East. Both clothes remind us that we are dealing with clothes that tell a story of the cruelty of human beings against fellow human beings. More of this follows in the next essay.

 

The Mandylion comes to Edessa by the disciple of Jesus Addai (Juda Thadeus) to Abgar V. ( Note: The picture seen on the handkerchief in the image below is a drawing. The actual Mandylion looked like a shadow).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~22~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

               The Sudarium of Oviedo (Face cloth), (by courtesy of Alfonso Sanchez Sanchez Hermosilla).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~23~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

23. A VICTIM OF TORTURE AS ATTESTED BY THE HIGH LEVELS OF BILIRUBIN 

           

1)Testimony of untold torture: One of the team members of STURP that went to Turin to make the most thorough examination of the Shroud was an American Jew known as Barrie Schwortz. While going there, he like many of the team members, believed it would not take more than just a few minutes to shown that the Shroud is a work of human hands. The actual testing proved them too presumptuous.  In his many conferences and presentations of his experiences about the Shroud he never tires telling people that while it did not take long for the scientists to see and confirm that the image on the Shroud is not a product of human art and the many tests that were carried out pointed to the confirmation that the Shroud was not a fake. Still one observed element held him from acknowledging that the Shroud was authentic for not less than 17 years after the 1978 tests.

 

The stumbling block was the redness of the spots and areas supposed to be blood marks.  The reason for that doubt was eliminated when Allan Adler one STURP blood expert revealed to him that what accounts for the redness of the blood was the high level of a substance called bilirubin. The red marks were not paint. It was true human blood. Test to establish the presence of hemoglobin come out posit. Tests for porphyrin, an essential component of blood come out positive.  Now, blood experts know that bilirubin is formed and secreted in the blood owing to various causes including extreme torture. For some reason, bilirubin prevents the blood caught into the fabric from darkening. Even by looking at the marks left behind by the wounds and the lacerations on the body of the man in the Shroud it is not difficult to understand that he was brutally tortured. Owing to that traumatic condition, secretion of bilirubin in the blood was inevitable. Owing to the presence of bilirubin, that blood could not lose its natural redness when it seeped into the cloth and dried there as normal blood behaves.

 

2)Medieval forger excluded: The discovery of the bilirubin effect on the Shroud is strong evidence that the man we see in the Shroud was really tortured. Secondly, it allows the researcher to refute with good reason any claim that some unknown medieval forger could have created the image by taking the Shroud sheet and smeared on it in the most natural places human blood of a tortured victim in the most accurate way and superimposed the image over the blood marks.  Observation shows that in fact the blood was on the cloth before the image went there. Beneath the blood marks there is no blood. Moreover, the bilirubin effect on the blood was not known in the medieval times. For that reason, a forger at that time would never have thought of torturing a human being to obtain blood containing bilirubin in the calculation of convincing a twenty-first century scientist, who noticing that blood on the fabric still remains red would be forced into the deception that the image on the Shroud really belongs to a human male that was tortured as Jesus is said to have been treated. We are left wondering what gain the forger expected to receive from the scientist or the world, after his trick would have caught somebody in the trap of deception many centuries after the forger himself would have died. On the whole, the medieval forger would have to include in image true details which were unknown to people of his time such as a photographic negative before photography itself was invented; he thought of embedding pollen grains onto the Shroud to convince the twentieth century investigator that in order to reach Europe in his time the Shroud must have travelled all the way from Jerusalem leaving traces of where it passed by embedding the local pollens of its passage within the fabric.

 

3)In conformity with what Christianity teaches: Christianity does not pretend to deny history that Jesus suffered. On the contrary Christianity holds Jesus’s suffering a fundamental element in its interpretation of Jesus’ mission. The Nicene Creed says “I  believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ… For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven … For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried, and rose again on the third day…”. The Shroud retells what happened to Jesus so well that some thinkers have been prompted to call it “the fifth Gospel”.

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~24~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

(Left) The face image on the Shroud appears as a natural photographic negative. (Right) The photographic process inverts the colors in that natural negative swapping the darks with the brights thus making the negative appear  the positive.  Then image enhancement technique is applied to the apparent negative making the blood marks stand out red against the unbloodied areas of the image.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~25~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

25. NOT A PAINTING NOR A SCORCH YET EVOKING PILATE’S ECCE HOMO  

1) The Holy Mandylion: Historians of great fame including Ian Wilson contend that there are scattered pieces of evidence that in the early centuries of Christianity there was a mysterious cloth, Mandylion, on which was imprinted an inexplicable image, an acheiropoietos (not made by human hands). The fact that the cloth was conceived to be such implies that the image lacked the properties we always associate with drawings. Shroud historians further hold that this image must have been one and same thing as the Shroud of Turin which bears a mysterious image of Jesus, the man whom Pilate introduced to the hostile crowds after he had him brutally scourged with the words, “Ecce Homo, that is “Behold the man”. Pilate introduced Jesus to the blood thirsty crowd  before condemning him to death by crucifixion. He had done his job of getting him scourged terribly even though he had failed to see any wrong in him.

After its arrival in Edessa this mysterious image came to be known as the image of Edessa.  Edessa was an ancient town located in the country of Turkey where the present town of Sanliurfa stands.  There, it was widely venerated as an holy object. It was given the name “the holy Mandylion” (agion Mandylion), then “the image of Edessa”. Cf. Ian Wilson, The Shroud: Fresh Light on the 2000 -Year Old Mystery… pp .233-234.  With regard to the question how it came to Edessa, to begin with, a 100% perfectly recorded information is not available. But a considerably reliable oral tradition existed that the cloth could claim its roots in Jerusalem. Evidenced narratives maintain that it was one disciple of Jesus known as Jude Thaddeus (Addai) who not very long after Jesus’ resurrection brought the cloth to Edessa and presented it to the reigning King Abgar V. Behind the reason of the journey of the cloth from Jerusalem there was an interesting legend that said this:

 

At that time Edessa was ruled by King Abgar V a contemporary of Jesus even if the two lived in different places. Now, while Jesus was proclaiming his message of the Good News to his co-nationals and working miracles of all kinds in his homeland, King Abgar had a health problem. Some sources say that Abgar was suffering from advanced leprosy and was not able to walk normally while others speak of a different illness. In short, Abgar needed some medical intervention which all efforts had failed to access. Then, at one point of time, news reached the king that somewhere in Palestine there was a powerful prophet called Jesus who was teaching and performing miracles of all kinds, healing the disabled and even raising the dead. At this news Abgar sent an emissary with a letter to Jesus, asking him for the favor of coming over to Edessa to cure him. He even made a promise that, after curing him, Jesus would be awarded permanent permission to reside in his kingdom and enjoying the privileges of proclaiming his message with impunity wherever he wanted in Abgar’s kingdom. The emissary went to Jerusalem and delivered the request to Jesus. The legend goes that, in response, Jesus said that he was unable to travel over to Edessa at that time, but promised to later on send his disciple to have the king healed. The emissary drew the face of Jesus on some material before returning to the King bringing with him Jesus’ response to Abgar plus his drawing.

 

2) Later: After Jesus’ resurrection and ascension one of Jesus’s disciple known as Addai (Jude Thaddaeus) went down to Edessa coming from Jerusalem. He reached the city gate and holding high a framed mysterious image showing the face he was led to the presence of the King. On beholding the image, the King stood up in all reverence to receive it and was healed instantaneously to the amazement of everybody throughout Abgar’s kingdom. News of the miraculous cure spread like fire everywhere. Abgar, together with all the members of his family, relatives and the citizens in general converted to Christianity. Subsequent history would see the building of a dignified reliquary to house the inexplicable image that distinguished itself from any other art-work, and henceforth to be venerated. 

 

All those who saw it were unable to understand how it might have been formed. It did look like any artistic product.  Puzzled by its formation mystery the people gave it the descriptive name “Acheiropoietos” which means “not made by hands”. Historians regard this object one and the same thing as the present Shroud of Turin.  The most thorough tests that modern science has made show that the Shroud image is neither a painting nor a scorch. This confirms the accuracy of the earlier descriptive name “acheiropoietos” an image that did not involve anything to get formed: no colorant of any sort; neither dye nor ink whether liquid or gaseous; no heat - nothing at all from outside itself.

 

3)The STURP team of scientists: These came to Italy in 1978 hoping to be able to show that the image was a paint of some kind.  They went home admitting that their 120-hour round the clock investigation supported by eight tons of the most modern equipment left them unable to answer the question concerning the image formation mechanism. The excellent team comprising some of the best experts in the corresponding disciplines bound together not by their faith but sorely by their common desire to know the truth as scientists left as they came. All the same, they had seen something: An inexplicable image of a Man like the Gospel Jesus who apparently ended up by being humiliated, crushed and cut off as the next essay shows. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~26~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

“Ecce homo” “Behold the man” (Jn 19: 5).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~27~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

27. D ERIDED,   MOCKED, SCORNED, FLOGGED, CRUSHED AND CUT O FF

 

1)Evidenced in the Shroud: The painting on the previous page shows how Jesus was derided. Images by artists depicting Jesus’ derision abound in art history (example at Caravaggio in North Italy). In the Shroud science sees a man who has undergone derision, mockery, scorn. Here is a man who has been flogged, crushed and cut off just exactly like Jesus of the Gospels.

 

As sindonology is a multi-discipline science. It is probably comparable to a large edifice fitted with tens of windows, of different size each capable of allowing in light when it is open.  So, biblical exegesis is one of those windows. It has its own role to play.  It can allow in light when opened. For that reason, it is not inconsistent to allow the biblical exegete to say something about the Man of the Shroud. So, while the various windows of the physical sciences remain open to bring light into the question of how the Shroud image might have been formed, the large window of the exegete that is supposed to try to give the meaning and interpretation the Shroud needs to be left open as well. 

     

      Biblical exegesis knows that Jesus has undergone derision, mockery, scorn, flogging and humiliation.  The Man of the Shroud does not seem to have received a different treatment.

 

2) Derision: “Some of them started spitting at his face, hitting him and saying “Play the prophet” “He was blindfolded and beaten, and then mocked, Prophesy! Who hit you?” Lk 22:63.   Jesus was stripped of his clothes. “And they stripped him and put a scarlet cloak round him” (Mt. 27:28).

 

3)Mockery: Mark the evangelist describes Jesus’ mockery like this: “The soldiers led him away to the inner part of the   palace, known as the Praetorium and called the whole cohort together. They dressed him up in purple, twisted some thorns into a crown and put it on him. And they began saluting him, “Hail, king of the Jews”. They struck his head with a reed and spat on him and they went down on their knees to do him homage” (Mk 15:16-19). The torturers smashed a bush of thorns onto his head in the most brutal fashion, calling him King of the Jews, which the Jews standing there were not pleased to hear. “And having twisted some thorns into a rown they put this on his head and placed a reed in his right hand. To make fun of him they knelt to him saying, ‘Hail, king of the Jews. And they spat on him and took the reed and struck him on the head with it” (Mt. 27:27-31).

 

 

4)Flogged. “As you can see, the man has done nothing that deserves death, so I shall have him flogged and then let him go”. (Lk 23:15b-1). That was said by Pilate. Flogged for no fault. Killed brutally despite his innocence.

 

5)Cut off: Looking well at the image in the Shroud, it is difficult to miss the cognizance that this is the man Isaiah was talking about when he wrote the poem that later scholarship came to identify as the fourth song of the servant of God who after mockery, scorn and flogging was crushed and cut off. “Forcibly, after sentence, he was taken. Which of his contemporaries was concerned at his having been cut off from the land of the living, at his having been struck dead for his people’s rebellion?” (Isa. 53:8)


000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~28~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

                                                                        

 

                                  

 

              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~29~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

29. SIDE PIERCED BY LANCE WHILE BACK LACERATED BY SCOURGES

 

1)Pierced in the side:The side of the man of the Shroud was pierced by a sharp object causing a puncture in the chest of the crucified man that measures 4cm. This was the average width of Roman lancea (in Greek lonche) in surprising agreement with Prophet Zecharia’ prophecy regarding the Messiah, “They will mourn for the one whom they have pierced as though for an only child” (Zac 12:10). The spear was thrust into the side between the fifth and six ribs of the body of the man hanging on the cross, dead. At the piercing of the side blood and a light blood serum, a fluid which the man who does not speak medical language could call “water” came out.  This is what happened to Jesus as John the evangelist testifies. “When they came to Jesus, they saw he was already dead, and so instead of breaking his legs one of the soldiers pierced his side with a lance; and immediately there came out blood and water” (Jn 19: 33-34).

 

2)Legs not broken: Forensic experts affirm that the blood visible on the Shroud that must have flowed out of the wound in the side was post-mortem blood unlike the blood that came out from other wounds such as the bleeding following the puncturing of the head blood vessels in various points when the bush of thorns was pressed on it.  Most evident of this is the Greek Epsilon-letter shaped blood flow stain (like an inverted 3) seen on the forehead of the man.

 

The heart was pierced to ascertain the death of the victim. It is because, when decision to accelerate the death of the crucified men by breaking their legs (crurifragium) was reached, it was considered no longer necessary to break Jesus’ leges as they had done to the other men crucified with him, as he was already dead. But they needed to be 100% certain he was dead to be able to give an accurate report to the Governor, Pontius Pilate that the capital punishment he had pronounced was duly executed. So, they pierced his heart as the ultimate proof to exclude every chance of a pretended death. According to Christian tradition, the job was carried out by the centurion, Longinus by name.

 

3)Crurifragium: The act of breaking the legs (crurifragium) was normally used to accelerate the death of the condemned in two ways. In the first place, the breaking of the legs was accompanied with a faster loss of blood.  With more blood loss the chances for the victim to keep alive diminished. Secondly, with the legs unbroken, the victim could remain hanging there for hours and hours waiting in agony for the arrival of his death thanks to the possibility inhaling and exhaling. The body oscillated between being supported by the spikes in the feet and being suspended on the nails in the wrists even if at the cost of unbearable pain in the hands and the feet. Doctor Pier Baima Bollone describes the terrible scenario of the suffering of the man crucified when the crurifragium has not yet been done (cf. Pier B. Bollone, Sindone o No, p.13).  Standing on the nail in the feet the man is able to breath. But the pain in the feet is so terrible. Owing to that pain and fatigue the crucified is forced to relax his body a bit by suspending his body on the wrist nail. In that lower posture asphyxia invades and the victim must raise up himself by pushing his body again against the foot nail to gain some breath. Hence the victim sags on and off. As time passes the periods between foot support and wrist suspension become shorter and shorter. Breaking the legs puts an end to all movement paving the way to the inevitable death.

 

4)The Shroud in the light of Isaiah’s prophecy: Looking at the Shroud through the eyes of Science one senses a striking congruence between what happened to the man wrapped in the Shroud and the pain expected to befall God’s suffering servant as foretold by Isaiah: “I have offered my back to those who struck me, my cheeks to those who plucked my beard; I have not turned my face away from insult and spitting” (Isa. 50:6). The back of the man in the Shroud is covered with scourge marks, testifying the savagery of he endured. The spiked metal balls or rough animal bones at the end of the whip to torture him left his whole back lacerated.

 

The scourge by which the skin of this man was lacerated; the nails by which he was fixed on the cross through his feet and his wrists and the lance, by which his heart was opened, were man-made instruments at the service of human brutality.  We shall see their images on the following essay.

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~30~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

 

 

Above is a picture of the Roman speak called   “lancea’ in Latin and lonche in Greek).

 

Above: Roman nails

 

 


 

 

Above, left: Frontal image. See four top triangular patches. The third patch counting from left of the image horizontally is surrounded by a blood/ serum mark. All of these patches were sown their by the Poor Clares in 1534 following the 1532 Chambery fire.  The right image is a close-up of that area.  The red is blood. The less dense shade is blood serum which fluoresces in ultraviolet light.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~31~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

31.ACCREDITED BY TRADITION AND DEFENDED BY THE AGNOSTIC

1) Interface between faith and science: The Shroud could rightly be considered as a shared interface between faith and science. It is a meeting point of a wide range of interdisciplinary inquiries all of which aim at understanding what it is and what it means. On the one hand this event “challenges human intelligence” to use the expression of Pope John Paul II, which among other things sends the message that there still remain mysteries to be pondered about it. But while more studies continue to delve into its mystery, there is no denying that for centuries the Shroud has been accredited by tradition as the burial cloth of Jesus.  The believer can see it as a sign of one most important historical event, namely the suffering, death and resurrection of Jesus. And this sign is powerful enough to wake up the agnostic to the consciousness that, after all, even the believer has a tangible reason to offer in defense of his position and it would not be accurate to relegate the entire body of his faith activity to a blind leap into the dark. An open-minded scientist will not be offended by discovering a truth in his field of research that supports what the believer holds. For example, though agnostic Yves Delage, an impeccable professor in anatomy who after three years of studying the Shroud photographs taken by Secondo Pia in 1898 did not hesitate asserting his conclusion that this artifact belongs to Jesus. He did what a true scientist ought to do. Only a scientist of doubtful integrity could say “A is not equivalent to d” when all the evidence available shows that “A and d” are equivalent. And there are many people who were formerly agnostic but have been drawn to faith by the Shroud.

 

2)A sign of contradiction: Ironically, while the Shroud receives support as an unquestionable witness of the historical Jesus of Nazareth from agnostics and great experts such as Barrie Schwortz who, to use his expression “have no horse in the race” some people of great learning who believed in Jesus in the past found it impossible to associate the Shroud with him.  Examples include Bishop Pierre de Arcis of Troyes who regarded the Shroud to be a forgery and went as far as writing a letter to the Pope those days denouncing the authenticity of the Shroud.

 

In an unsubstantiated memorandum to Pope Clement VII, Bishop Pierre de Arcis cited his predecessor Bishop Henri of Poitiers claiming to have known the artist who had cunningly painted the Shroud. Strange enough, that artist is not mentioned while the present age technology declares the Shroud a work not made by human technology. Another highly learned cleric, who tried to use everything in his possession to contradict the Shroud’s authenticity was a priest, Chevalier Ulysse an accomplished professor of history at Lyon University. Between 1899 and 1903 Chevalier Ulysse is known to have written not less than 50 articles trying to persuade the world that the Shroud was a hoax. But, all summed up, the overwhelming evidence in the possession of contemporary science and technology is in favor of the Shroud. (cf. www.medievalshroud.comThe medieval Shroud; Ian Wilson, The Shroud, pp. 142-150).

 

Just as science can distinguish between visible and invisible light both of which enable the same man to grasp different aspects of the same universe without distorting its integrity, the Shroud event can enable man to appreciate the truths and importance of the visible and the invisible realities in the created order of existence without sacrificing the purity of our knowledge of the realities that are.

 

3)Biblical exegesis: The Shroud is acknowledged by exegetes as a burial cloth of a man whose death accords with the Gospel description of the death that was endured by Jesus of Nazareth. Meantime, science also affirms that the Shroud records happenings that point to what is known to have happened to this same Jesus. Which means that in the Shroud science and faith can stand together speak the same language. In order to understand the Shroud, science practically feels bound to consult faith, while in turn faith consults science to be able to interpret the Shroud adequately. In the Shroud science and faith do not simply meet to listen to the same messenger, which is the Shroud itself, but also each to testify that the same substance is the content of their ultimate conclusion, which is the whole meaning of the Shroud and its revelation of the one eternal truth – Christ, the key to all inquiry.  The next section will examine what the so far only direct in-depth study of the Shroud STURP in 1978 came out with.

 

The Gospels narrate that the centurion at the head of the cohort that implemented the death sentence of Jesus is the soldier that was commissioned the nasty task of piercing the side of Jesus to make sure he was dead. Tradition identifies the soldier as Longinus. Upon finishing the job “the centurion, together with the others guarding, had seen the earthquake and all that was taking place, and they were terrified and said, ‘In truth this man was the son of God’ (Mt. 27:54).

 

Jesus was already dead when one soldier pierced his side with a spear. From the wound gushed out blood and water. Blood and water marks on the Shroud appear around the area where the spear pierced the side.  (Below): The spear went in  between the fifth  and six ribs opening heart.

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~33~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

33.UNSOLVED BY THE TEAM OF STURP SCIENTISTS AT SAN GIOVANNI   

It has been mentioned earlier on, a highly refined team of scientists and scholars comprising of the most serious seekers of the truth as it reveals itself to humanity through the objective method gathered at the Turin Cathedral of San Giovanni (St. John the Baptist) to carry out the most in depth scientific investigation of the Shroud ever after months of preparation and rehearsal back home at the 1978 public Exposition of the Shroud. Their team was called STURP for The Shroud of Turin Research Project.

 

2) Distinguished knowledge seekers:  This group of very competent and best equipped scientists worked on the Shroud for 120 consecutive hours after the 1978 public exposition examining every smallest part of the Shroud. True seekers of knowledge, these men do not know how to take anything for granted nor accept a claim untested. The basic problem they wanted to answer was how the image on it was formed. Like true knowledge warriors, they meant to do a thorough job till the right answer was obtained. Failing to get an early answer they extended their time in keeping with their wise protocol over three years. After the most intensive scrutiny of the samples, they had taken home for thorough multiple re-examination and re-assessment, they were forced to admit by the sheer facts that their combined study had left them more confounded by the Shroud mystery than before.

 

The best well equipped brains had gone to Turin to solve the image’s formation puzzle. They came back with a mass of data indicating several characteristics of the Shroud image that made them admit not only that the image was inexplicable but also that its formation was even more mysterious than they all had thought it to be. One might probably say that their hopes to hit a solution had bounced back at hitting an Acheiropoietos /an image not made by human hands. The extreme superficiality of the image on the topmost fibrils of Shroud and the absence of capillary flow of anything into the Shroud material excluded use of the brush by a painter to do the work.  Absence of any sufficient traces of chemicals or colorants of any form also pointed to the improbability of human art being responsible for the image formation. There is nothing coming from outside the Shroud that will have produced the image. It is the perfectly uniform change of color of some outermost fibrils of the Shroud threads that will have taken place to leave the negative image on the surface - an inconceivable phenomenon to the people who will have seen it first and still remains irreplicable by modern technology.

 

 So, in short, the team came out with a negative knowledge of the Shroud than otherwise. All that their efforts enabled them to know is what the Shroud image is not instead of what it is. They could confidently affirm that it is neither a scorch nor a painting. Donald Lynn, one of the STURP members claimed that from the point of the laws of science, this image is not supposed to be there and yet it is there.

 

The team carried out numerous non-destructive tests including “electron microscopy; photography at various wavelengths, front and back; UV spectrophotometry of fluorescence; X-ray fluorescence and absorption radiography; thermal photography; mass spectroscopy; laser-microprobe Raman spectroscopy; attempts to alter color on fibers using acids, bases, oxidants, reductants and organic chemicals” (cf. The Mysteries of the Shroud of Turin, The American Society for Nondestructive Testing, https//www.linkedin.com). They all worked intensively for five days and nights wasting no minute while determined to come out with the key to the secret of the mystery.  But at the end of all their efforts they admitted their failure to reach a definite solution. 

3)The sharpest blunted: This is how the STURP put it in their own terms: “The scientific consensus is that the image was produced by something which resulted in oxidation, dehydration and conjugation of the polysaccharide structure of the microfibrils of the linen itself. Such changes can be duplicated in the laboratory by certain chemical and physical processes. A similar type of change in linen can be obtained by sulfuric acid or heat. However, there are no chemical or physical methods known which can account for the totality of the image, nor can any combination of physical, chemical, biological or medical circumstances explain the image adequately…We can conclude for now that the Shroud image is that of a real human form of a scourged, crucified man. It is not the product of an artist. The blood stains are composed of hemoglobin and also give a positive test for serum albumin. The image is an ongoing mystery and until further chemical studies are made, perhaps by this group of scientists, or perhaps by some scientists in the future” Cf. Shroud.com/78concl.htm.

The Teams failure to come out with the answer of the question they had set out to answer was not due to the does not point to their incompetence but the complexity of the question. Living at a distance of almost 40 years from the time of their tests, present day technology is still incapable of giving us a solution to one of the challenges embedded in the Shroud which was discovered the year 1976 Professors John Jackson and Eric Jumper two years before commencement of their tests. This is the image’s three-dimensionality which will be touched in the next essay.

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~34~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

      

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back of the Shroud                                                             Scourge marks on the back of the Shroud in realistic drawing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~35~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

35.THREE DIMENTIONAL INFORMATION ENCODED IN THE IMAGE

 1)Unique property: Working at Sandia Laboratories in 1976 two friends John Jackson and Eric Jumper fed a picture of the Shroud of Turin into a special machine called a VP-8 image analyzer and were stunned by what they saw. This analog computer was invented by Pete Schumacher in 1972 (https://www.shroud.com). It was “designed for evaluating x-rays and for other imaging purposes…”/   It “converts image density (lights and darks) into vertical relief (shadows and highlights). When this device was used to read the shroud image by the physicists Dr. John Jackson and Dr. Eric Jumper, unlike all the normal images, the Shroud image came out showing clear reliefs and lower points depending on how far the linen cloth was from the respective part of the body wrapped within it. At this observation these physicists understood that the Shroud image was a unique image embedding features that are not to be found in any of the conventional pictures or drawings.

 

The variations depended on the intensity of the image such that the points of the body that were closer to the linen appeared darker than those which were further removed from it. This means the relative distances were encoded into the image. A relevant inference is also in place, namely that the image is not formed by contact. This means by meticulously mapping the distances determined according to the darkness or lightness of the image it was possible to create three-dimensional object appearing as a human form. The observation gave them the clue that mechanism involved in creating the Shroud image the distances between the sheet and the body were taken into account. By the same observation the possibility of the image having been formed by contact or painting by means of a dye or chemical of some sort was eliminated.

 

The discovery ignited these friends’ curiosity and they thought of forming a team of capable person to investigate how the image might have been caught onto the cloth.  That was the root cause of the birth of The Shroud of Turin Research Project, abbreviated as STURP.

 

2)Deeper formation mystery: In discovering the three-dimensional property of the Shroud image told the physicists that the image was formed at a distance and not by direct contact. (cf. http//:shroud3d.com) “The density of the image is proportional to the distance between the body and the cloth”. Which means that, for example, the image of the tip of the nose which most probably was closer to the cloth wrapping the body is more intense than the region of the orbit of the eye which was more distant from the cloth at the formation of the image. It ought to be borne in mind that the intensity of the image does not indicate that the fibrils that got changed became darker than the other fibrils. Each and every fibril that was affected changed to the same degree as every other fibril that changed. Greater intensity is observed in the places where more of the fibrils were affected.

 

3)Deeper mystery greater revelations: Secondo Pia’s discovery that the Shroud image had photographic properties was a very big leap in getting to know the richness of information it contained. Through that discovery a great secret was opened to mankind. Man was enabled to behold again the real features of the Man of Shroud for another time in almost two thousand years.  And now the discovery that this image contains three-dimensional information was another big leap of technology that enabled the world of science to bring to light what he really was in his body occupying space. Professor Giovanni Tamburelli in Italy wasted no time in 1978 to work out a computer image suggesting topographical relief rendering of the face and the whole body of the man. But probably the climax was to be reached through the work of the team of scientists under the direction of Giulio Fanti, Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua in 2018.  The statue this team came out with is shown on the following page.  Fanti said, “This is the three-dimensional representation in actual size of the man of the Shroud, created following the precise measurements taken from the cloth in which the body of Christ was wrapped after the crucifixion”. He added, “Therefore, we believe that we finally have the precise image of what Jesus looked like on this earth.  From now on, He may no longer be depicted without taking this work into account.” Joshua Gill,  Aleteia, 2018) http://dailycaller.com.2018/03/208>

 

             

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~36~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

Above: Three-dimensional image of the face worked out by  Prof. G. Tamburelli.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~37~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

37. HEAD CUPPED WITH THORNS FOR ABYSMAL PAIN

 

1)For abysmal pain: Examination of the dorsal image of the Shroud corresponding to the back of the head there are numerous marks of blood. Forensic expertise understands from these marks a scenario where the head of the man who was lying on that part of the Shroud was covered with blood that had flown from different spots of the head.  That is good indication that the whole head was punctured with objects, which suggest helmet-like bush of thorns.

 

2)Crowned like Jesus and none other: In recorded history there was only one Man who was crowned with thorns. This is Jesus of Nazareth. Traditional artists have always depicted the head of the crucified Jesus with a round crown of thorns. The image on the Shroud shows the reality of what really happened. The soldiers who thought of humiliating Jesus as King of the Jesus (Rex Iudaeorum)  by jeering at him with a crown were not interested in decorating the man they held to be the worst malefactor even if for no reason they knew. They wanted to scorn him and let him suffer the most abysmal pain possible. Nothing harsher could have achieved a better punishment for them than a bush of roughly spun branches of thorns, hit merciless into the scalp. It is thought that the crown of thorns which Jesus wore was the jujube tree, whose botanical name is Ziziphus spina-christi (http://en.m.wikipedia.org). From the punctured parts flew the blood only to meet the long hair of the man finally ending up in the mark formation that can be observed on the Shroud on the area where the head lay.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~38~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A bush of roughly woven thorns mercilessly smashed upon his head.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~39~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

39.ENTOMBED JEWISH STYLE; HIS FEATURES SEMITIC

 

1)     Finishings: The execution completed, and the death confirmed by thrusting a spear into Jesus’ side with his head bowed down, there was found no need of carrying out the crurifragium, in his case. The Shroud shows no marks of the crurifragium. For the rest one could go by the report of St. John who saw it all happen. “Consequently, the soldiers came and broke the legs of the first man who had been crucified with him and of the other.  When they came to Jesus, they saw he was already dead, and so instead of breaking his legs one of the soldiers pierced his side with a lance; and immediately there came out blood and water” (Jn 19:32-34). Crurifragium was the breaking of the lower leg bones normally done to accelerate the death of the crucified (Cfr. https://en.m.wiktionary.org). A hammer could be used to do the job. With the lower leg bones broken the crucified hang suspended on the arms, tied onto the crossbeam (patibulum) by a rope or fixed on there with a nail. Breathing becomes very difficult and loss of blood compounds the problem.

 

Jewish burial custom observed: Finally the body was taken down from the cross. It was prepared for burial the best way possible, but in a hasty way as the Sabbath evening was setting in. cf. Jesus, the Turin Shroud and Jewish Burial Customs, (https://www.journals.uchicago.edu Volume 45, Number 1, Winter 1982).  Probably science does not know who this man was. What chance does the believer have to guess who it is? If we are dealing with the body of Jesus, it is Joseph of Arimathea who brings a costly sheet of linen fabric of a herringbone twill for a farewell gift to a friend who has passed.  The eyewitness of these events confirms that another secret disciple called Nicodemus is there to assist. On his part Nicodemus “brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, weighing about a hundred pounds” (Jn. 19:38-42). They took the body of Jesus and bound it in linen clothes with the spices following the Jewish burial custom. At the place where he had been crucified there was a garden, and in this garden a new tomb in which no one had yet been buried. Since it was the Jewish Day of Preparation and the tomb was nearby, they laid Jesus there (Jn19:39).

 

The face napkin that was used to cover his face as he hang on the cross, dead, and had picked up blood the symbol of life was buried with him as Jewish custom would not have allowed to throw it.  This was to be seen by the apostles Peter and John on the day of the resurrection as testified by “the disciple whom the Lord loved”. This disciples says, “Simon Peter, following him, also came up, went into the tomb, saw the linen cloths lying on the ground and so the cloth that had been over his head; this was not with the linen cloths but rolled up in a place by itself” (Jn 20:6-7).

 

 2) Man of Semitic Features: As for the features of the man who was buried in the Shroud, to the estimates of the experts put him between 1.70cm and 1.88cm, most probably taller than the average man standing close to him (http://en.m.wikipedia.org). The variation owes to the fact that the image on the Shroud does not have definite demarcation to show where exactly the image begins and where it ends. But on the whole what we see in the Shroud is a strongly built man.

 

Experts concur that by his looks the man wrapped in the Shroud has semitic features. He has a long face and wears long his hair. His nose is suggestive of a man of semitic origin. His blood type is AB positive which is pretty dominant among the semitic people but not equally common among the other cultures of the world.

 

In the forest of controversial information existing around this man where however posotive hints such as those we have seen in this essay are not less abundant there are individuals who ask, “Could this be the Man foretold by the prophets? Could he be the Christ?” But as Fr. Peter Rinaldi once observed there are also many who will look at the Man in the Shroud and say in their heart and understand that it is the one. “It is the Lord”. The next essay will dwell on the hint of the linen which was used for his burial.

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~40~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

                      

 

 

                       Above is an example of a Jewish tomb, hewn from the rock just like the one Joseph of Arimathea offered for the burial of the body of Jesus.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~41~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

41.NEW LINEN APT FOR A HIGH PRIESTLY TRIBUTE                                                                                                                      

1) New burial cloth just as new tomb: The tomb hinted upon in the previous essay was new. The Gospel of John testifies that “At the place where he had been crucified there was a garden, and in this garden a new tomb in which no one had yet been buried” (Jn 19:41). But new also was the Shroud used for the burial of Jesus.  The Gospel of Mathew adds that it was also clean (Mt. 27:9) The Shroud of Turin has been described as the world’s most studied artifact. Apparently, it is destined to attract all eyes and hearts. What accounts for that is its uniqueness. In the whole world, there is nothing known in art history or technology that could even remotely be compared to it. Its simplicity as a textile and the complexity of the image it bears challenge all who look at it. It remains a mysterious object that yet needs to be contemplated.

 

Why do the Gospel writers seem to put any importance that the tomb as well as the burial cloth were new? What message does the evangelist send by underlining the fact that when used to wrap the body of this man the cloth was new, clean and presumably not cheap since its donor, Joseph of Arimathea a wealthy man would have wanted to offer the best tribute in his ability to his friend.

 

Ironically, there was something new also in Joseph of Arimathea after witnessing the death of Christ. For, now we see the man who earlier on was too cautious not to risk his reputation among his own people changed. Probably too cautious if not somehow timid, Joseph would consult Jesus in secret when Jesus was still alive, working miracles and attracting multitudes to his talks.  But, now the same man gathers the boldness to go before Pilate to ask for the body of the man Pilate had condemned to death.  In so doing Joseph was like telling Pilate “I remain opposed to the condemnation you have served to this man”; or like saying in Pilate’s face “The man you have just sent to death was my very best friend”. For a cautious man that kind of act was not prudent enough and considering that after all Jesus was already dead and Joseph had nothing to save the act was not only very risky but also lacking in the least sense of pragmatic behavior.

 

2)Symbolic aspect: It is neither its texture nor its weave that distinguishes and sets the Shroud apart as a unique object.  Textile experts and historians know that fabrics of its kind have existed for centuries. From ancient cultures we have examples of similar fabrics and similar weave. While the Shroud is made out of linen, history knows that linen clothes have been in existence up to 5000 years before Christ. A sample of linen is cataloged by one British archeologist Rosalind Hall of the Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archaeology (cf. Pier Luigi Baima Bollone, Sindone o No, “Societa’ Editrice Internazionale, Torino 1990, p. 55). As for the weave, the Shroud is woven as a herringbone twill (cf. W. Kucewicz, https://leksykonsyndonologiczny.pl “The fabric was created by interlacing warp and weft threads on the  loom, creating a 3:1 weave (known as herringbone”).

 

Those who hold the present Shroud of Turin to be the burial garment of Jesus will not find it difficult to see in it a kind of continuation of Jesus’ seamless garment claimed by tradition as the robe that Jesus wore all the time since his childhood which might be interpreted to stand as a symbol of Jesus’ enduring faithfulness and timeless constancy. While celebrating the Holy Mass, priests wear seamless garments called “Chasubles”.  A chasuble has no sleeves, so it can allow the hands to move freely pointing to the inner freedom they enjoy as they offer sacrifices to the Father.  In the Shroud the eternal priest manifests a prototype garment symbolizing that freedom. He can raise up his hands to offer to his eternal Father the sacrifice of his own self in atonement for humanity.

 

  But for the believer there is also another symbolic element to the Shroud. At the present the Shroud’s color could be described as a sepia. Owing to its age it has taken up a yellowing, like the originally white clothes we know that were much whiter in the past than what they are today. One could say that originally the Shroud looked less yellowish than it is today. And right there, the Christian believer will do well to remember the following words from the Book of Revelation: “Anyone who proves victorious will be dressed, like these, in white robes” (Rev. 3:5). Though condemned to a shameful death as a criminal, the Man in the Shroud was dressed in a white robe for his funeral to underpin his victory and innocence. Just as Isaiah had prophesied, “He was given a grave with the wicked, and his tomb is with the rich, although he had done no violence; had spoken no deceit” (Isa. 3:9). Therefore, among other things, the Shroud speaks about innocence, a virtue that cannot be buried forever. Happily enough, the obtaining circumstances were such that on a temporary burial could be offered as the next essay will show.

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~42~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

“The Cross

Received the Living Jesus and Gave Him back to Us Dead.

https://shroud.com/images/FullColr%20web72dpi%20flipped.jpg

 

The Shroud

Received the dead Jesus

 and Restored Him to us Alive”.

Blessed Sebastian Valfre (129-1710).

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~43~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

43.TEMPORARY BURIAL IN THE LAND OF JUDEA                                                                                         

 

1)Time and location: The caption to this essay implies at least two important questions, namely that 1) whether the burial of the Man in the Shroud was planned to be temporary and 2) and whether that it took place in Judea.  The answers are not too obvious even if not impossible to get.  To respond to the first question, knowledge about the burial customs of the people where the burial itself took place is a must. The implication is that the answer to the second question could serve as a key to the answer to the first question.

 

There are good historical hints that the Shroud was used in Judea. The pollen grain studies of Max Frei Schulzer point into that direction even though, alone, cannot establish definitively that the burial took place there. The more enlightening piece of information is the identification of Jerusalem soil particles in the place of the knees.   (Cf. Essay # 19 page 29 above). When the condemned fell down under the weight of the cross the knees got torn at hitting the ground and picked up particles of soil which later transferred to the Shroud when the body was wrapped in it for burial. Tests suggest that the soil on the Shroud around the area of the knees could be from Jerusalem. That would suggest that the incident took place in Judea.   After that, knowledge about the Jewish burial customs can enlighten us whether the burial was complete or temporary.     Close examination of the body in the Shroud suggests a temporary burial in a sheet evocative of the linen cloth that the Gospels attest to have been supplied by one secret friend of Jesus, Joseph of Arimathea, “a prominent member of the Council who himself lived in the hope seeing the kingdom of God” (Mk. 15 :43). Judging by the evidence from the Shroud, the blooded body of the man who died by crucifixion and pierced by a sharp object in the chest while still hanging on the cross, was quickly prepared for burial and laid on this long cloth. Pollen studies and the soil particles identified on the Shroud corroborate the assumption that all this took place in Judea. Head towards the center of the sheet and feet close to the end of the long sheet, the man was placed on the sheet on a flat surface facing up. The second half  of the Shroud was then folded over the body which was subsequently carried into the tomb, apparently hewn in a rock. The painting captured by Della Rovere on the following page can aid the imagination to conceptualize what the wrapping of the body of the Man in the Shroud could have looked like.

 

2)Blood first and image later: From the first moments of the body contact with the Shroud blood from the scourge wounds must have started to map their shape onto the Sheet. Understandably, the Shroud image was not yet there.  The implication is that, whoever looks at the Shroud today should grasp that the blood marks from the wounds pre-exited the mysterious photographic resembling image on the Sheet. The blood marks are older than the image even if by a few minutes or hours. This affirmation is consistent with the observation, by the researchers, that the image formed on the sheet later than the blood marks. Consequently, if any other particles of blood were to be discovered on top of the image one would be forced to conclude that the body continued to exist in contact with the body even after the image had been formed, thus forcing the scientists to think of another theory of the image formation besides those that command the greatest chance of probability today. Otherwise, the best explanation in place implies that after the formation of the image on the Shroud the body that was wrapped in it was no more.  It seems to have vanished before the planned secondary attention to body could be performed.

 

About Jesus, the Gospel of John has the following to say: “They took the body of Jesus and bound it in linen cloths with the spices, following the Jewish burial custom” (Jn. 19:40).  According to the Book of Exodus, the vestments of the priests were to be woven from linen. “They made the tunics of finely woven linen for Aaron and his sons, the turban of fine linen, the head-dresses of fine linen the breeches of finely woven line, the waistband of finely woven line embroidered with violet purple, red-purple and

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~44~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

crimson as Yahweh had ordered Moses” (Ex. 39:27-32).  For an idea about what this kind of cloth really was like, we may have to look at what extrabiblical sources have to offer us.

 

3)Lucky linen: Pier Luigi Baima Bollone says that linen was used in different regions of antiquity including Egypt, Palestine and parts of Asia. He cites Herodotus confirming that linen was used especially by the priestly families in Egypt (cf. Pier Luigi Baima Bollone, Sindone o No, pp. 55-57). But linen used for this burial was destined to something unique. As the next essay will show, this is the sheet that captured the image of incorruptibility.

Above is a painting by Della Rovere depicting the preparation of the body of Jesus for burial.

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~45~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 45. INCORRUPTIBILITY SNAP-SHOTTED ONTO THE LINEN

1) Memorial snapshot of incorruptibility:  It looks like the tomb assigned for the temporary burial of this victim became a chamber for a memorial snapshot of an extraordinary ending of the story of the man wrapped in the sheet. Here is the point where science keeps its silence while faith picks up the pride to speak about the resurrection. By an explosion or bolt of light that defies description, that body escaped from the limitations of time and space leaving behind on the Shroud an icon of its incorruptibility that generations would describe as “not made by hands” or the Acheiropoietos.  That tremendous burst of light gave to the world the original of all Christo-centric icons and images of Christ which present themselves as resembling attempts to depict the earthly looks of the incarnate Son of God, immortal and eternal.  In the Old Testament every attempt to make curved images was forbidden. But in the event of this light, the Lord himself who assumed human flesh, so that human beings can see him and touch him, and hear him deigned to create his own image by his own authority so that posterity might even see his earthly features.

 

2) Inconceivable - Unidirectional light in a dark chamber: If the thought of a bolt of light coming from the body that was wrapped in the Shroud commands any consensus, it would be necessary to infer that this emission of radiation took place inside the tomb where the body was placed. In a way, that tomb was transformed by the event into a photographic-like chamber or a camera that witnessed the taking of a snapshot of the marks of the suffering endured by the Man seen in the Shroud. Due to the limitation of its scope, science does not have in its vocabulary the word “resurrection”. For that reason, science cannot possibly describe that snapshot as a witness of the resurrection. But, probably outside the laboratory, the believer can as well be tempted to use that term if he/she so wishes without fear of being contradicted by science, which does not know what that word really means in the language of quantification of reality.

 

3)Itemized receipt of a ransom: From the strictly objective point of view, the Shroud is a bearer of a scientific witness of a mystery while from the extra-scientific perspective it carries a mass of information that irresistibly awakens the beholder into a kind of religious feeling and indebtedness to Christ’s incomparable love. After his long meditation of what the Shroud is, Russ Breault who has studied the Shroud for not less than 30 years, has come out with some accurate image of the Shroud of Turin.  Aware that the Bible sees in Christ the man who has ransomed us, bought us, redeemed us or purchased us with his blood, Breault comes out with the inference that in the event of Jesus’ vicarious death for the salvation of mankind a transaction has taken place. But wherever there is a transaction, a receipt is always in order as a sign of recognition of the exchange and as a testimony to all. Consistently, Christ’s ransom deserved a receipt. Breault argues that in the Shroud we meet that testimony. The Shroud could be regarded as an itemized receipt of the price that has been paid to accomplish the salvation of mankind. (Cf. YouTube interview with Russ Breault, President and Founder  of the Shroud of Turin Education Project, EWTN, Shroud Exhibit Bible Museum, Washington, 2022).  

 

4)Zipped visual narrative of the passion: The Shroud comes to us as a snapshot of Christ’s passion from start to the very end. What we find recorded on the Shroud is more than a still picture. The many hours of time encompassing the suffering of Our Lord are as it were frozen into an infinitesimally short moment and then recorded in visual form.  

 

As a result, we find ourselves standing before a detailed report of things that took place before and after determinate periods of each other. And our mind is challenged to grasp it all at once. So, for example we can see in the Shroud the moment of Pilates’ pronouncement that Jesus will be scourged at the pillar, Roman style and then his later condemnation to death, and the carrying of the cross, then his torturous ascent to the hill of Golgotha, his falling down on the road, his crucifixion, his agony on the cross and so on.  

 

5) Praises to the Passover Victim: An old Catholic hymn “Victimae paschali laudes, immolent Christiani” (Let Christians offer sacrificial praises to the Passover victim)  makes reference to the Shroud as one of the testimonies of the resurrection.

Dic nobis Maria,                                                        Tell us, Mary

 quid vidisti in via?                                                    What did you see on the way?

Sepulcrum Christi viventis,                                        I saw the tomb of the living Christ

et gloriam vidi resurgentis,                                        And the glory of his rising,

Angelicos testes,                                                         The angelic witnesses

Sudarium, et vestes.                                                   The shroud, and the clothes.

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~46~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

Prof. Giulio Fanti whose words have been used for the Preface of this book sees all these things and much more through the ultra-modern tools and throws the whole weight of his scholarship on it saying: “The Shroud is a divine gift; a symbol of the Resurrection”.

 

 

 

The women who went to the tomb of Jesus very early in the morning of the resurrection.

          

                                            

                                           Prof. Emanuela Marinelli visited KWAUSO bringing with her a

gift of a Shroud Replica for us in 2014.   Above pictured with Fr. Stanislaus on the shore of Lake Victoria.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~47~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

47. CARBON-DATED MEDIEVAL IN 1988 BY A TEST NOW DEBUNKED

       1) Carbon-dating: a scientific instrument in human hands:  While just a few people were aware that on April 21,  1988 a piece of cloth was cut from  the Shroud, then sliced into smaller pieces and distributed to three laboratories of international fame, namely Zurich of Switzerland, Tucson in Arizona and Oxford of England, to serve as samples for Carbon-dating tests by one very reliable method called  Accelerator Mass Spectrometry or AMS for short,  the whole world was suddenly bombarded by the news media on October 13,  the same year,   that the Shroud had been dated medieval by the three laboratories.  I was in Rome that day. My interest in the Shroud had grown big. The announcement of the Medieval age was a shock to many people over the globe. To many, me included, who had sensed something very particular in this object, that day was sour. And there was no way of changing the news to something sounding better. In the past there existed a well-known proverb: “Roma locuta, causa finita”. But now something similar was born “Scientia locuta, causa finita” to imply that once science has made its verdict, further discussion is closed. The world found itself standing before what was presented to it as the final verdict about the origin and destiny of Shroud. Seemingly the enigma of this object might be solved by an easy explanation as an artisan forgery, produced by some unknown genius who must have executed his unrepeatable masterpiece sometime between 1260-1390 leaving behind neither sign nor signature of his/her identity.

 

2)The reactions to the announcement:  Reactions were not everywhere uniform. While many people who had a good knowledge of Shroud doubted and questioned what they heard from the news, millions of people who either had not taken sufficient time to delve into some sufficiently deep study of it welcomed the news as a great discovery of science. Unfortunately, a greater portion of the mass media took the lead at disseminating the news that the Shroud had finally been uncovered to be the greatest hoax of all time. People who had never heard about the Shroud, now had their first time to hear about it and they heard about it as a faked thing meant to feed the minds of the gullible or the cheap masses of people who are tuned to stubbornly hang on falsehood even though the truth, healthy and more human dangles generously within arm’s reach. Yet science could not be so easily overturned by such simplistic explanation. However, one thing became very clear, namely that Carbon-dating technology is a scientific instrument in human hands which do not enjoy error immunity.

 

2) The damage of ensuing confusion and the prospects of the will to correct: Serious researchers, including historians, medical experts and archaeologists, who had spent years of study of the Shroud could not know how to reconcile the results with the combined facts available to the world of science from the many perspectives of study and discipline.  True experts in carbon dating failed to see how these extraordinary results could be maintained together with whatever else was held acceptable for years till then. Raymond Rogers, one of the original members of STURP shows that the sample for the 1988 test was cut from a corner that shows reweaving and is not representative of the Shroud.

 

It is interesting to hear that after the publication of the carbon-date age of the Shroud in 1988 published in Nature, the British Museum did not bring to the scientific public the raw data they had used to arrive at the controversial date. These were only made available in 2017 after one scholar, Tristan Casabianca, had demanded them by citing the UK Freedom of Information Act governing scientific openness of public authorities. (Cf. https://ico.org.uk>media>g...PDF) from the institutions that had kept them away from access of other competent researchers. The result was the discovery of a few inaccuracies of material and procedure sufficient to throw the 1988 announced results several centuries behind  cf. (https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12467). Emanuela Marinelli, Giuseppe Pernagallo and Benedetto Torrisi were there to corroborate the work.

 

3)The troubling question: At one point in his big volume, The 1988 C-14 Dating of the Shroud of Turin: A Stunning Expose’ 2020, Joseph G. Marino had this to state: “A majority of scientific and historical evidence proves the Shroud of Turin is the authentic burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth. Only one test says otherwise – the carbon date performed in 1988… Most people are unaware that C-14 is normally only a confirmatory test and does not outweigh the accumulation of other evidence.  So how did one test deceive the world about the most important relic in human History?” (Shroud.com, Archives 2020). For Giulio Fanti, there is no doubt. The Shroud is the very thing that was used on the first Good Friday. He maintains, “I am sure that the Holy Shroud is the very cloth that wrapped the body of Jesus Christ, the risen One” (Cf. Personal letter of Prof. Fanti to Fr. Stanislaus,  2024). That is how these two authors answer the troubling question regarding the authenticity of the Shroud. Their opinion is founded on tight evidence.

000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~48~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


              Above: Fr. Peter Rinaldi with a group of visitors .

   

Left: Barrie Schworzt, STURP’s official documenting photographer. 

He sent me the photo above on June 13, 2024 and died on June 21, 2024.

Please Lord,  Barrie Schworzt served you well. Reward him together with all the sindonologists who have acknowledged you before the world with the eternal bliss of beholding your Face.

 Right: Professor Giulio Fanti.


 [H

 A SEQUEL OF GAZING AT THE SHROUD

AND AN ENSEMBLE OF GRATITUDE TOKENS

“IL DOPO LO SGUARDO ALLA SINDONE”

49.TOUCHED BY AN ICON WITH INNOCENT BLOOD OF SOMEONE WOUNDED IN THE HEART

  

1)      Pope John Paul II profoundly touched: Star gazers could find themselves lost in wonder before the marvels of creation as they scan the star constellations, the galaxies and the nebulae. But at the end, their persistence gets them to understand something out of it. Gazing at the Shroud, Pope John Paul II described what he saw as “an icon of the suffering of the innocent in every age”. His words summarize the central theme dealt with in this second part of the book. His gaze at the Shroud prompted him to think of “the millions of human beings who live in hardship and humiliation on the edges of great cities, especially in developing countries”. The individual who looks at the Shroud from a perspective similar to Pope John Paul II, can spontaneously be challenged to think of a neighbor’s plight. John Paul II was touched by this icon which is stamped with the real blood of the Innocent One whose side was pierced by the soldier’s lance. Together with him many thousands or even millions of people may be equally touched. They will probably think of the poor, the sick, the victims of social injustice and the like. Jesus spoke about the enduring chance that such disadvantaged groups will always be there. “You have the poor with you always” (Mt. 26:11). For that reason, the need to care for someone in want is here to stay. And consequently again, the relevance of the Shroud, that awakens its beholder to the consciousness of their obligation to consider the less fortunate, endures (Cf. Pope John Paul II’s address to thousands of pilgrims in Turin, during the public exposition of the Shroud. “The Shroud whispers: believe in God’s love and flee from the misfortune of sin”, L’Osservatore Romano, 27 May 1998, # 4).

2)      Like the spontaneous response of the crowds on the Day of Pentecost: We read that, on the day of Pentecost, Peter and the other apostles stood up and spoke to the multitudes gathered in Jerusalem about the passion of Jesus and the miraculous defeat of the plans of destroying him. He said, “Men of Israel … Jesus the Nazarene was a man commended to you by God by the miracles and portents and signs that God worked through him when he was among you…This man, who was put into your power by the deliberate intention and foreknowledge of God, you took and had crucified and killed by men outside the Law. But God raised him to life, freeing him from the pangs of Hades; for it was impossible for him to be held in its power” (Acts 2:22-24). The people’s response was spontaneous: “Hearing this they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “What are we to do, brothers?” (Acts 2:37).

 

3)Those who care to see: In a way, those who care to look at the Shroud in earnest will find themselves in a similar situation. The section that we have just concluded dwells on what the scientific researcher sees and says about the Shroud. The present section will focus on what the believer hears from the researcher and the Church Tradition; how the facts he has gathered could shape his understanding of reality and how he decides to respond. Our fundamental question is this: “Now that we have come to know what has happened to this Man of the Shroud, what are we to do brothers?” Incidentally, both, the scientific researcher and the believer could be one and the same individual, the seeker for the truth – the same individual looking at the same matter only from two different vantage points.

 

4)At the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, the year 2020, the Italian Shroud community organized a virtual coming together of people from different life settings to contemplate the Shroud of Turin. Several people were asked to share word about the Shroud through recorded video over the internet. I too was invited to share what I had.  In my posting I said that, on our part, the Secondary School called KWAUSO might be cited as a tangible sign of our response to our gaze on the Shroud. My presentation was in Italian and I summarized what we have been led to do in the words: “Il dopo lo squardo alla Sindone” which might freely be translated as “a sequel of our gaze at the Shroud”. It is just one answer out of a myriad of options of responding to the inner challenge left behind on the mind that gazes at the Shroud in earnest.  It is voiced throughout the international media that there is no single artifact in existence upon which so much has been written as the Shroud of Turin. The implication behind that observation is unmistakable, namely that many authors and researchers must have been touched by the phenomenon of the Shroud.  The purported world-wide interest in the Shroud would seem to suggest that the Shroud will be one of those artifacts that cannot be completely ignored. And indeed, those who find time to gaze at the Shroud in all seriousness, will feel a kind of indebtedness.

 

5)The Shroud speaks: This is because the Shroud does not come out to us as a forged document. The Shroud speaks of a true event, concerning a real human being, in a situation of dire helplessness, in need of a heart that cares. Addressing thousands of people gathered in Turin as pilgrims seeking a glimpse of the Shroud, St. John Paul II said “Whoever approaches it (the Shroud) is also aware that the Shroud does not hold people’s hearts to itself but turns them to him at whose service the Father’s loving providence has put it… (The Shroud) reminds modern man…of the tragic situation of his many brothers and sisters and invites him to question himself about the mystery of suffering in order to explore its causes… Before the Shroud, how can we not think of the millions of people who die of hunger, of the horrors committed in the many wars that soak nations in blood, of the brutal exploitation of women and children, of the many millions who live in hardship and humiliation on the edges of great cities especially in developing countries?” (#3, 4). It can therefore be affirmed that the Shroud sends a wake-up message to the beholder.  The shroud challenges the gazer to do something for the brother in need of succour or relief. It requires courage to gaze at the Shroud properly, for doing so excludes the leisure and the freedom of ignoring the plight of one’s neighbour.












































































II. A SEQUEL OF GAZING AT THE SHROUD

AND AN ENSEMBLE OF GRATITUDE TOKENS

“IL DOPO LO SGUARDO ALLA SINDONE”

49.TOUCHED BY AN ICON WITH INNOCENT BLOOD OF SOMEONE WOUNDED IN THE HEART

  

1)      Pope John Paul II profoundly touched: Star gazers could find themselves lost in wonder before the marvels of creation as they scan the star constellations, the galaxies and the nebulae. But at the end, their persistence gets them to understand something out of it. Gazing at the Shroud, Pope John Paul II described what he saw as “an icon of the suffering of the innocent in every age”. His words summarize the central theme dealt with in this second part of the book. His gaze at the Shroud prompted him to think of “the millions of human beings who live in hardship and humiliation on the edges of great cities, especially in developing countries”. The individual who looks at the Shroud from a perspective similar to Pope John Paul II, can spontaneously be challenged to think of a neighbor’s plight. John Paul II was touched by this icon which is stamped with the real blood of the Innocent One whose side was pierced by the soldier’s lance. Together with him many thousands or even millions of people may be equally touched. They will probably think of the poor, the sick, the victims of social injustice and the like. Jesus spoke about the enduring chance that such disadvantaged groups will always be there. “You have the poor with you always” (Mt. 26:11). For that reason, the need to care for someone in want is here to stay. And consequently again, the relevance of the Shroud, that awakens its beholder to the consciousness of their obligation to consider the less fortunate, endures (Cf. Pope John Paul II’s address to thousands of pilgrims in Turin, during the public exposition of the Shroud. “The Shroud whispers: believe in God’s love and flee from the misfortune of sin”, L’Osservatore Romano, 27 May 1998, # 4).

2)      Like the spontaneous response of the crowds on the Day of Pentecost: We read that, on the day of Pentecost, Peter and the other apostles stood up and spoke to the multitudes gathered in Jerusalem about the passion of Jesus and the miraculous defeat of the plans of destroying him. He said, “Men of Israel … Jesus the Nazarene was a man commended to you by God by the miracles and portents and signs that God worked through him when he was among you…This man, who was put into your power by the deliberate intention and foreknowledge of God, you took and had crucified and killed by men outside the Law. But God raised him to life, freeing him from the pangs of Hades; for it was impossible for him to be held in its power” (Acts 2:22-24). The people’s response was spontaneous: “Hearing this they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “What are we to do, brothers?” (Acts 2:37).

 

3)Those who care to see: In a way, those who care to look at the Shroud in earnest will find themselves in a similar situation. The section that we have just concluded dwells on what the scientific researcher sees and says about the Shroud. The present section will focus on what the believer hears from the researcher and the Church Tradition; how the facts he has gathered could shape his understanding of reality and how he decides to respond. Our fundamental question is this: “Now that we have come to know what has happened to this Man of the Shroud, what are we to do brothers?” Incidentally, both, the scientific researcher and the believer could be one and the same individual, the seeker for the truth – the same individual looking at the same matter only from two different vantage points.

 

4)At the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, the year 2020, the Italian Shroud community organized a virtual coming together of people from different life settings to contemplate the Shroud of Turin. Several people were asked to share word about the Shroud through recorded video over the internet. I too was invited to share what I had.  In my posting I said that, on our part, the Secondary School called KWAUSO might be cited as a tangible sign of our response to our gaze on the Shroud. My presentation was in Italian and I summarized what we have been led to do in the words: “Il dopo lo squardo alla Sindone” which might freely be translated as “a sequel of our gaze at the Shroud”. It is just one answer out of a myriad of options of responding to the inner challenge left behind on the mind that gazes on the Shroud in earnest.  It is voiced throughout the international media that there is no single artifact in existence upon which so much has been written as the Shroud of Turin. The implication behind that observation is unmistakable, namely that many authors and researchers must have been touched by the phenomenon of the Shroud.  The purported world-wide interest in the Shroud would seem to suggest that the Shroud will be one of those artifacts that cannot be completely ignored. And indeed, those who find time to gaze at the Shroud in all seriousness, will feel a kind of indebtedness.

 

5)The Shroud speaks: This is because the Shroud does not come out to us as a forged document. The Shroud speaks of a true event, concerning a real human being, in a situation of dire helplessness, in need of a heart that cares. Addressing thousands of people gathered in Turin as pilgrims seeking a glimpse of the Shroud, St. John Paul II said “Whoever approaches it (the Shroud) is also aware that the Shroud does not hold people’s hearts to itself but turns them to him at whose service the Father’s loving providence has put it… (The Shroud) reminds modern man…of the tragic situation of his many brothers and sisters and invites him to question himself about the mystery of suffering in order to explore its causes… Before the Shroud, how can we not think of the millions of people who die of hunger, of the horrors committed in the many wars that soak nations in blood, of the brutal exploitation of women and children, of the many millions who live in hardship and humiliation on the edges of great cities especially in developing countries?” (#3, 4). It can therefore be affirmed that the Shroud sends a wake-up message to the beholder.  The shroud challenges the gazer to do something for the brother in need of succor or relief. It requires courage to gaze at the Shroud properly, for doing so excludes the leisure and the freedom of ignoring the plight of one’s neighbor.



Fr. Stanislaus greets Pope John Paul II who described the Shroud as “an icon of the suffering of the innocent”, a theme implicit in the title of the previous essay. The picture was taken on January 7, 1989 one day after the ordination of the late His Excellency Justin Samba as Bishop of Musoma Diocese, Tanzania. Each of the newly ordained bishops was invited to a private audience with the Holy Father the day after the ordination.  He could be accompanied by a few friends. Happily, I accompanied Bishop Samba.

 

This was three months after the British Museum had announced the Shroud to be of medieval origin (October 13, 1988). That the Shroud was a medieval product was a heartbreaking announcement to many all over the world even though it is difficult to guess the approximate figures. At Collegio San Pietro, where I was residing as a student, no official count was made to find out the extent of the impact of the announcement. I am not even sure if there was any sizeable number students who were even aware of the existence of the Shroud.  In any case, as the great Shroud historian Ian Wilson observes, the homily John Paul II pronounced before thousands of pilgrims to the Shroud in Torino in 1998, ten years after the Carbon-14 test announcement will always leave anybody doubting if the now St. John Paul II was ever persuaded in the least by the medieval verdict, made in the name of science.

 

Greeting the Holy Father, during the private audience, I felt my heart uplifted for coming so close to the man who on the day of his election to the chair of Peter told the world of believers in Italian, “Non abbiate paura…” Do not be afraid of proclaiming the truth of the Gospel. But more especially, today I saw myself greet a distinguished personality among the Shroud gazers - the former Archbishop of Krakow, Cardinal Karol Wojtyla who - during the Public Exposition of the Holy Shroud in 1978 did what not every Cardinal could think of doing. Those days, Cardinal Wojtyla travelled all the way from Krakow, Poland to Turin to do pilgrimage before the Shroud being one hardly noticeable pilgrim, out of the throng of tens of thousands of pilgrims. As I greeted him there was a magnetic smile on his face. But when I introduced myself, his smile broadened out even more at the mention of my name “Stanislaus”. Whether his smile broadened because my name reminded him of two out of the five patrons of Poland, his homeland, namely St. Stanislaus of Szczepanow and St. Stanislaus Kostka is less important. To me the more touching thing was this: on that day, I shook hands with the later St. John Paul II, great admirer of the Shroud of Turin, who not long after his pilgrimage to the Shroud was called to Rome to join the conclave that elected him Pope. 





51.HEALED IN ORDER TO FOSTER AND PROMOTE OTHER PEOPLES’S INTEGRAL HEALTH  

1) Healed to heal: In his letter to all the people living in the Dispersion, St. Peter speaks about Jesus the Lord, drawing from Isaiah’s fourth song of the Servant of God (Is. 53:5), saying “By his wounds we were healed” (Pt. 2:24). As we gaze at the Shroud, those words give us another theme for contemplation. Many scholars hold that Isaiah’s Servant of God refers to the Christ. And that is the story of the Shroud.  In the Shroud the believer sees the man who was bruised to bring salvation to the world and was crushed like grain to restore man’s health. Once healthy or even once foot has been set on the way to healing, the proper gazer at the Shroud begins responding to its call to try reaching out to a brother in need. The act of gazing at the Shroud properly sends the message to the understanding of the gazer that through the wounds of the Savior the individual is not healed to remain indifferent to the condition of his neighbor. People are not healed to bury their health inside their being. Rather, they are healed so that by their involvement they can promote each other’s health. The gift received gratis should prompt the receiver to go out and cause some transformation in the condition of those around us. The joy of being healed grows by being shared to others in the need of healing. Getting healed is a key to the healing of others.

 

2)My Bishop’s consent: It is in the light of this that I get to understand why when I mentioned my intention to the Bishop, Rt. Rev. Nestor Timanywa that in my heart there was a great desire to find a way of helping our people by opening up at least one more door to affordable quality education in the name of the Shroud, he felt very happy about the idea and right away he expressed his support of my imagination. It makes me understand why the Bishop himself who had earlier on allowed me to stay outside the Diocese for not more than one year and a half, seeing that there was consistency between my said aspirations and my returns acted as though he had given me the permission to stay out as long as I needed to work on the School project for the goals which he also shared. I can imagine, he had been thinking of his people and here he saw coming another good opportunity to do something to promote some relief for them.

 

I went to America by his permission and while away there I made sure I remained in touch with him and kept him informed of the progress I was realizing and some of the huddles I was facing. And he was always encouraging me to keep on strong. When I proposed the name “KWAUSO” for the school I was dreaming of, his approbation was most prompt and enthusiastic. He did not have the slightest objection. When I told him on the phone that I had just received the first $100.00 for the project from some 21 Pre-school children, unsolicited, he described the gift as one coming from little angels just as I had seen them myself as they handed the donation to me on May 12, 2005 at St. Vincent de Paul Parish in Peoria.

 

3)Dream watered by general goodwill: When time came to look for the land for construction purposes, Bishop Nestor Timanywa wrote and signed the request letter to the Itahwa Village Administration, and authorized me to bring it to those concerned and charged the Itahwa Parish Priest Fr. Lucas Mulokozi to follow it up till the request was positively answered. And when, after happy discussions and longish deliberations, the village consent was reached to offer the land, Bishop Timanywa was there in person to receive and ascertain the boundaries of the land that was given in response to his letter. The allotted land was given to the Bishop of Bukoba Diocese for the purposes spelled out in the Bishop’s letter of request.  All that involvement could be cited as sure evidence that Bishop Nestor Timanywa valued the KWAUSO School dream, a service set under him on behalf of Bukoba Catholic Diocese, and to be continued in his successors, for the benefit of our people, particularly the marginalized: And all that to the honor of the compassionate Face of Our Lord as seen in the Shroud.

 

In the meantime, the Vicar General, later Bishop of Kayanga Catholic Diocese, Almachius Rweyongeza was closely following the developments. His position as Vicar General was taken by Monsignor David Mubirigi who happily carried on interest in the School Project as well. While all that happened, Fr. Stanislaus was playing the role of director in the unfolding of this initiative from start to the present.

 

4)A work to continue: Upon the retirement of Bishop Timanywa, came in Bishop Desiderius Rwoma who canonically took over the leadership of Bukoba Diocese including the ownership of KWAUSO Secondary School till his own retirement arrived and the ownership of the School went into the hands of the Apostolic Administrator, Bishop Method Kilaini. But Bishop Method Kilaini was not a stranger to the project. Over and above working with KWAUSO as the official Chairman of the School Board of Directors for a couple of years before, Bishop Kilaini he had been a close advisor to its founder since the time of the formation and refinement of the dream many years back. Then when time for his resignation from office arrived, ownership of KWAUSO passed into the hands of Bishop Jovitus Francis Mwijage on January 27, 2024 at his ordination and installation as Bishop of Bukoba Catholic Diocese. Two months later, on a casual visit to KWAUSO to assess its development and as a gesture of encouragement to those he found at the site, the recently installed Bishop Jovitus Mwijage did not hesitate to express his appreciation of what he saw by describing the school as one of the jewels of Bukoba Diocese.

52.








53.EXAMINING THE COMMITMENT CALL OF THE SHROUD IN THE CONTEXT OF TANZANIA

 

1)The answer in a fragile piece of cloth: Once one respectable person said to me upon seeing two of my Shroud books on top of the table somewhere: “Look, two more books again on the veil of Veronica! What does all that interest in these things and this veil still serve, Father?” Apparently, his intention was to ignite the ridicule from the people who were there towards my book about the Shroud. Luckily, nobody responded. The noise was left to die a natural death.  Unfortunately, his statement betrayed utter ignorance about what the book was about. He continued:  Is it worthwhile spending all that energy trying to relate that piece of cloth to Jesus? We know, Jesus is in heaven. What more do you need to tell us?” Not being sure whether the man was just kidding or earnest I proposed no answer.

 

But even though to those questions I gave no answer, the objections that were raised against my attitude did not change my conviction that, properly gazed at, the Shroud bears a transcultural significance. It touches every section of humanity irrespective of where we are and calls for some serious response from all. In the very first place, the Shroud touches everybody because it speaks about the salvation of all without discrimination.  The question, what is following after the life I am living today is asked by all and the Shroud gives a hint about the proper answer as it speaks about the transformation of our earthly and transient form of existence into the immortal form after the resurrection. It is in view of attaining that life that the individual will feel prompted to make some adjustments in living the present one.

 

One modality of response could be in the form of service to others. This is valid for many situations and social settings including Tanzania. Many types of human activities can be rightly be regarded as forms of service. But not all of these have equal value or urgency. The Shroud opens up myriads of options of services to its gazer. It remains the Shroud gazer’s task to determine the service that is most relevant and appropriate, most befitting and momentous for the needs of the specific community at the given time and circumstances. One Shroud gazer.  Once Jesus said referring to his sheep: “I have come so that they may have life and have it to the full” (Jn 10:10b). The Shroud witnesses Jesus dying so that his sheep may have life abundantly. A consistent Shroud gazer could decide doing some sacrifice so that his brothers may access better life.

 

2)Wonderful opportunity. Logically, a social service that could most effectively enable us to reach out to more people in greater need, for a longer time in the most Shroud-like manner would deserve our most immediate attention. So, to my thinking, given our Tanzanian setting, a Secondary School would give the most relevant answer to some of the most pressing questions, for the reasons to be found in the next page. And while thinking those ideas I did not have a single sent for approaching the implied building project.

 

3)Suggested by the context: At the time of our exploration of the most befitting sequel to our gaze at the Shroud there was heard a general outcry for quality education facilities throughout the country. My own experience that I will talk about later on in the division # 55 told me that a boarding secondary school was in our area a priority need. The question might be asked as to how a school could fit into the picture of promoting the Shroud by attending a social project. Fortunately, the answer is pretty easy to get. It was enough to look at the Shroud and recall the compassion that radiated from his eyes during his earthly life. His eyes were keen such that what looked like a small detail drew his unfailing attention. The following incident narrated by St. John the evangelist could suffice to bring out the point:

 

4)Learn from Jesus: “Now in Jerusalem next to the Sheep Pool there is a pool called Bethesda in Hebrew, which has five porticos; and under these were crowds of sick people, blind, lame, paralyzed. One man there had an illness which had lasted thirty-eight years, and when Jesus saw him lying there and knew he had been in that condition for a long time, he said, “Do you want to be well again?” “Sir,” replied the sick man, “I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is disturbed; and while I am still on the way, someone else gets down there before me.  Jesus said, “Get up, pick up your sleeping-mat and walk around” The man was cured at once, and he picked up his mat and started to walk around” (cf. John 5:2-9). The implication of this is: Jesus who loved all men would reserve his keener eye for the disadvantaged - those whose condition called for the primary attention.

 

5)A good school: Neat and beautiful and made purposely to help us focus our keener eye on the economically less strong in the society surrounding us, KWAUSO would be a befitting means to honor Jesus’ compassionate Face. Such a school must be self-sustaining, through the contributions of the parents, in spite of their humble circumstances. While concerted efforts are made by every stakeholder, one remembers also that good souls are always around to inject their helping goodness into it to ensure that the Lord’s work will not fail for lack of support. We thought that way and the necessary support came. We got land at Kashambya seen in the picture on the next page for free.


54



 

55.  PONDERING THE PROSPECTS OF A SCHOOL AS AN APT SEQUEL FOR EXECUTION  

 

While my awareness of the existence of the Shroud back in April 1985 came unexpected, the thought that I should make a response to it in the form of a school project was not equally sudden. The idea evolved gradually in the wake of concrete life experiences.

 

One sunny afternoon, July 2002 I was driving from Ntungamo Major Seminary where I was putting up for couple of days of my June/July holidays to a place known as Kemondo. Along the road, I saw many school children walking home from one local Secondary school under the scorching sun; tired but seemingly feeling happy because there was no better option open to them to do their schooling under more acceptable conditions.  I understood these children were doing this every day of their school year. They were walking the long distance going to school in the mornings and again the same distance after the classes in the afternoon. I knew their school was not a boarding. So, I was sure they were making those distances on empty stomach. They were waking up earlier than 5:00 a.m. for sure and then, being rain or none start trotting to school without a spoonful of tea or a morsel of bread or anything of the like.  Even though I knew it was good and healthy for the children to walk and do some jogging, the distances these ones had to make every day seemed to me way beyond the desirable levels. At that, it became clear to my mind that something needed to be improved.

 

And ironically, this is the year I had published my second book in Kiswahili on the Shroud of Turin bearing the title: Zawadi-Kumbukumbu: Sanda ya Torino.  So, now again, the Shroud idea came back to my head.  I began wondering whether the Shroud had any relevance to the questions that were now pestering me with regard to the schooling conditions of the children in the area. Then finally came some light: “How about the possibility of building a boarding Secondary school somewhere near? Clearly, it could only be one school while there are so many children elsewhere going through the same kind of experience. But that does not indicate that the idea is absurd. Even one more school would cause some relief. As to the question where exactly the school might be built, I thought of Kanyinya, an expanse of idle grassland between Kemondo and the creek known as Omukimbimbiri.  But, how and when?  It was a heap of questions with less answers. Nevertheless, I felt some sort of delight within me that I had questions for which I could try looking for a solution while I contemplated again the meaning of the Shroud of Turin.  For that reason, one could remotely trace the first elements of the dream of KWAUSO to those quiet deliberations even though the name of the School itself came much later.  In the next page we shall see how this thought gained stronger impetus at the memory of the prayer that Fr. Peter Rinaldi said for me when we met at Corpus Christi Church at Port Chester in New York, America several years back.




                              


  

Bishop Nestor Timanywa (at center), Fr. Fulgens Rutatekururwa (Construction adviser engineer) left and Fr. Lucas Mulokozi (Parish Priest of Itahwa Parish where KWAUSO is located.

                                        

Declaration of our objective.

                                                            


School logo summarizes the School aspirations.

 

57.ENKINDLED BY MEMORIES OF FR. PETER RINALDI’S PRAYER YEARS BACK   

1) Tracing the remotest origins of the idea:  Most of the literature about the Shroud of Turin that I got hold of at the beginning of my journey with the Shroud came from Fr. Peter Rinaldi, a Salesian Priest of Italian origin who served in New York. Apart from Shroud enthusiasts like Dr. John Jackson, it was Fr. Rinaldi who as a cleric, played a big role in bringing together scientists, the legal owners of the Shroud in Turin and the Catholic Church as the custodians of the Shroud so that non-destructive tests could be done on the Shroud. He also worked close with the American Shroud Guild that among other things published a periodical Newsletter.

 

2)From Bukoba to New York: Now at the end of my studies in Rome before coming back to Tanzania, I asked for the permission to go to America in order, among other things, to meet Fr. Rinaldi. He was working in the Archdiocese of New York at the Parish of Corpus Christi, in Port Chester. I asked the Rector to reserve a place for me in the Archdiocese of New York. It all worked in my favor and so I went to America, the Archdiocese of New York. I was assigned to do my ministry in one little Parish called Otisville about 83 miles from New York city. My plan was that from there I could arrange visiting Fr. Rinaldi.  On Monday August 10, 1992 three parishioners Judith Shields, Jeannette Varden and Donald Fitzpatrick gave me a ride escorting me all the way from Otisville to New York City. We found Fr. Rinaldi waiting for us at the rectory. It was big joy for both of us meeting for the first time after years of mail correspondence.

 

3)Fr. Peter Rinaldi: Fr. Rinaldi welcomed us into the dining room.  Naturally what dominated our conversation between a sip of coffee was the Shroud.  As our conversation proceeded, I drew my manuscript of my Kiswahili Book about the Shroud from my portfolio.  Its title was USO (the Kiswahili equivalent of the English wordFace”) and the Subtitle: Utafiti Kuhusu Uwezekano wa Picha ya Mateso ya Kristu (which might be translated as: “An Investigation into the Probability of the Existence of a Picture of the Passion of Christ”.   My choice of the title was by no means accidental. I meant the Face of Jesus as seen on the Shroud of Turin. The book was meant to present the basic scientific and historical facts about the Shroud of Turin.  I had used the same word “FACE” in the dedication of my doctoral thesis where I wrote, “To all those who in order to know the truth seek His Face without losing heart”. Fr. Rinaldi was delighted seeing my work and assured me he would place an order for the pictures I needed for the book.

 

Then Fr. Rinaldi invited us to walk around the Parish quarters.  The main stopover was a visit to the Shroud Shrine at the entrance of which was written the phrase “In Memory of His Death and Resurrection”. We entered inside the Shrine. Using the slightly elevated life-size negative picture of the Shroud as a visual aid, and with a joyful and confident tone that left no room for anyone of us doubting what this object meant for him, Fr. Rinaldi took his time to speak about the sequence of events that could have led to the death our Lord as attested by the Shroud. He pointed out the most evident marks inflicted by the scourge on the body of Our Lord. One could see marks of the nail wounds in the region of the wrist of the Crucified, the traces of the flow of blood different wounds and more. On that day more than ever before, a kind of consciousness was impressed onto my mind that in the Shroud we were meeting a truly noble work of extraordinary value.  Then Fr. Rinaldi led us to the main Church. We walked in from the front of the Church to the first step leading into the sanctuary, while my friends followed from behind. At the edge of the sanctuary, we stopped and knelt down in adoration of the Blessed Sacrament in the tabernacle, me on the left of Fr. Rinaldi.

 

4)Fr. Rinaldi’s prayer: After kneeling down, no time was lost before the 82-year old Fr. Peter Rinaldi extended his left arm over my shoulders and uttered an extemporaneous prayer saying. “Lord God, I thank you for this priest from Tanzania. I pray that you will bless and enable him to do for Africa what I have done for America in promoting the cause of the Holy Shroud. And to you blessed Philip Rinaldi, my uncle, I commend Fr. Stanislaus to your protection. Help him to accomplish what he desires to do for the Shroud in his homeland.”

5) Seed sown: I was silent as the prayer was being said. For Fr. Rinaldi, this was a prayer from his heart. But for me it was different. To me, that prayer was also a kind of inescapable challenge placed in the hands of Providence. For even though I had neither expected nor prompted Fr. Rinaldi to pray as he did, I could neither pretend not to have heard what he said nor shut up my mind from thinking about the implications of his words after he had expressed them. Had it been his intention not to let his prayer impact me, he could have probably chosen not to say it aloud. One thing was clear to me: Somewhere behind his prayer, I could sense a wish that I do something for my people in connection with the Shroud. What and how, Providence would know. Interiorly I accepted the challenge, but I did not say it to Fr. Rinaldi.  Finished the prayer, we passed through the sacristy door into the presbytery after which Fr. Fr. Rinaldi escorted us out to the parking lot where we had left our car. There we bad each other Good-bye. While that happened, I was not aware that this day of my first meeting with Fr. Rinaldi, was also the last one I was ever seeing him in the flesh and that the next time we meet, it will be in the presence of the eternal Father; for a few weeks later, I flew back to Italy and proceeded home soon thereafter to Tanzania. In any case, I had met Fr. Rinaldi and picked the challenge to do something for the Shroud; a challenge whose nature I still had to discover. (Continued on next page, below, after the pictures, pg. 58:)

 

                                   

Fr. Rinaldi’s Shroud shrine, at Corpus Christi Church, Port Chester:  Main crucifix in the Corpus Christi Church  Designed according to the Shroud image.                                                         











8

.
                         

Fr.  Peter Fr. Rinaldi & Fr. Stanislaus Mutajwaha at Corpus Christi Church, Port Chester, N.Y, 1992.

 Fr. Stan gave his Philosophy doctoral thesis to Fr. Rinaldi dedicated “To all those who in order to know the truth seek His Face, and showed him a draft of his Kiswahili book about the Shroud: USO: Utafiti Kuhusu Uwezekano wa Picha ya Mateso ya Kristu’.

===============================(Continued from previous page, page 57):

As we drove back to Otisville, the two ladies that had accompanied me from Otisville to Port Chester, Judith Shields and Jeannette Varden could not hide their inner joy at meeting Fr. Rinaldi, as they recounted their heartfelt impression of him as “a saintly man who speaks so convincingly about the suffering of our Lord those last hours of his earthly life”. Meantime, having not the slightest reason to contradict their opinion, my head was heavy with thoughts about Fr. Rinaldi’s prayer for me and his confident request to his uncle Blessed Philip Rinaldi, asking him to help me to do for my people back in Africa what he had done for America in connection with the promotion of the cause of the Shroud.

 

Those are the memories that flashed to my mind that afternoon when I saw myself witnessing the difficult situation of the children walking so many kilometers from School.  I persuaded myself to think that it was now for me to do something tangible for those children besides the two books I had written for the promotion of the Shroud. I thought that, for me, it was proper if I tried to promote the Shroud by paying attention to the need of those children. They needed a school and I thought my response should be leading me into that direction. In March the following year (1993) already working again at Ntungamo Seminary as lecturer and formator where I had been working as in-service teacher before I was sent to Rome, I received the package of the pictures that Fr. Rinaldi had ordered for me. Great joy again that I was now well equipped to work on my proposed book. But the joy was unfortunately short lived. For enclosed in the package was a letter from the House Superior at Corpus Christi Church informing me that Father Rinaldi had passed away (February 28, 1993). R.I.P.

59.RAYS OF COMPASSION RENDING THE HEARTS OF SHROUD GAZERSS

Gazing at the Shroud, many people feel from the depths of their hearts that their eyes are looking at the suffering Jesus has endured. But it would require an abnormal hardness of heart to see the suffering Jesus endured as depicted in the Shroud and still simply walk away from it untouched. It is probably for that reason that Pope John Paul II said the following words to the pilgrims gathered in Turin during the public exposition of the Shroud in 1978: “Whoever approaches it (the Shroud) is also aware that the Shroud does not hold people’s hearts to itself, but turns them to him, at whose service the Father’s loving providence has put it”. (“The Shroud whispers: believe in God’s love and flee from the misfortune of sin”, L’Osservatore Romano, 27(May 1998) #3. The implication is clear. Gazing at Jesus in the Shroud sends rays of compassion that penetrate their hearts prompting them to promote the cause of the Shroud or do something to help somebody in need.

 

On my part, apart from writing my two books in Kiswahili about the Shroud and my occasional talks about the Shroud I had not seen much yet that I might count as any serious activity to promote the Shroud or answer to the challenge implicit in Fr. Rinaldi’s prayer for me that I have hinted on in the previous subsection section. But now, with the on-going realization of the dream of KWAUSO, a work in the name of our Lord’s compassion which is also reflected in the image of the Shroud, I can see Fr. Rinaldi’s prayer for me being more fully answered. Ironically this work has also given me an opportunity to contemplate some aspects of “compassion”.

Like rays of light, compassion can spread from a simple source causing different effects on things that are located at large distances from the source. True compassion will tend to reach as far as possible. The thought to build a school to the honor of the Merciful Face of Our Lord is an attempt to promote the Master’s compassion among his people.  But, by my experience, a thought of that kind challenges the individual to the readiness to combine two opposing sets of forces in one single vase. For in the same vase there will be joy and bitterness, but the individual decides to go ahead all the same. There will be want and plenty, yet the individual remains focused. There might be pain and healing, yet the individual resolves not to go back.  There will be persecution and encouragement, yet the individual opts to proceed, come what may. If on the way the individual stumbles into envious eyes, the individual remains firmly resolute to jump over the huddles convinced that the blessings and consolation coming from the Lord as well as loving hearts will not diminish.

When I was little, there was a certain plant in my home village which we always tried to avoid touching. To the eye this plant looks usual with nothing extraordinary about it. It is not pungent and neither does it emit any kind of smell to warn or repulse anybody who might be passing close by. But at the touch to the skin, the plant burns painfully leaving the individual lamenting for having unknowingly pressed their skin against it. Similarly, decision to do compassion might involve passing through a pathway surrounded by all kinds of plants including the burning types of that sort. As the journey goes on, the probability is always high enough that, at some point, the skin of anybody walking the path will touch those leaves. The consequences are too obvious to mistake: the walker can hardly emerge from the bush without getting burnt by the plant.

The meaning of this similitude is this: It cannot be considered abnormal getting into difficulties for trying to light a little candle for the benefit of the Lord’s little ones. Doing anything in the name of compassion is like planning to raise up a whole generation to the heights. But doing so properly is likely to involve some sacrifice and pain because true compassion costs.  Consequently, if efforts calculated to promote compassion happen to stumble into painful and disheartening experiences instead of immediate happiness, let none be surprised. A popular proverb says it well: “There is no Easter without Good Friday”. And as it will be shown in the next page, pro-Christ activity is a highly rewarding commitment. It crowns life with meaning and fills the actor with inner joy. For that reason, it is worth embracing even if it might be physically or emotionally bruising. That explains the reason why we find it proper to dedicate our time and energy to remember with appreciation and gratitude the sacrifices, the toil and pains borne by those who through their contributions and involvement have helped in building KWAUSO Secondary School for the benefit of our Lord’s “little ones”. 

                          60

    

      Above: The first evening of the first arrivals at KWAUSO, February 28, 2011. The 8 pioneer KWAUSO children pose for a memorial photo with their first 3 formators. From left to right: Dorosella Deogratias; Sarah Masau; Divera Deogratias (Accountant); Hawa Yasin; Fr. Marcel Kaberwa (First Headmaster); Kelvin Superius; Norbert Philbert; Malina Alex; Sophia Leopold, Asella Anatory and Fr. Stanislaus Mutajwaha (Founder and Director). They had no predecessors to learn from. Flying on the wings of trust and hope these pioneers set the direction of KWAUSO with a smile of optimism on their faces.  For lighting, the power was supplied by a portable Honda generator donated by Philip and Paula Steele, great friends of KWAUSO from North Henderson in Illinois, corner pillars of KWAUSO from the start. (Right).

 

 Below: A few days after opening day the number of students increases. 


   


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61.CHRIST WITNESSED BY SELFLESS COMMITMENT:  A NEW GARB

                                      

1)Drawing from Christ to wear a new garb:  Speaking to people eager to listen to his word, Jesus gave the following teaching:

Then the king will say to those on his right hand,

“Come, you whom my Father has blessed,

take as your heritage the kingdom

prepared for you since the foundation of the world.

For I was hungry and you gave me food,

I was thirsty and you gave me drink,

I was a stranger and you made me welcome,

Lacking clothes and you clothed me,

Sick and you visited me,

In prison and you came to see me…

In truth I tell you,

In so far as you did this to one of the least of these brothers of mine,

You did it to me”. (Mt. 25: 34-46”).  Living that teaching is like wearing a new garb of selfless-commitment. Those words captured for us by the Evangelist could suffice to bring home a good lesson about the nobility of acts of compassion. The lesson is about selfless compassion which is neither a compassion for gain nor a compassion for show. It is rather a spontaneous compassion shown to the unknown beneficiary who walking in unexpected, in their different attire, walks in wanting and walks out, duly attended. It is a noble kind of compassion - a highly desirable way of witnessing Christ, the Master of compassion and for that reason definitely a most rewarding job – the key to have the above quoted words said to the actor: “Come, … Take as your heritage the kingdom prepared for you since the foundation of the world”.

 

2)Self-replication of compassion: When compassion is done in the pure intention of doing compassion it replicates itself. It gains itself and gets multiplied. For, the person who receives true compassion learns to reciprocate it with compassion. This means, true compassion is fecund; it is fruitful. Compassion bears compassion. An individual who has enjoyed the gift of compassion will feel some inner urge to do compassion to others. Hence compassion done towards the young is a seed of acts of compassion sawn for a later generation. Compassion does not go down into the grave. If in ordinary life what we plant today we shall reap tomorrow, compassion done today is a pledge of even greater compassion tomorrow.

 

An act of compassion in view of witnessing Christ today will bear a multiplicity of acts of compassion for him tomorrow. All that is tantamount to this: A single act of compassion accomplished in imitation of the compassion that is unveiled by our gaze on the Shroud will lead to a repetition of acts of compassion in the days to come.  Compassion is not a lesson to be learned in the lecture hall but a reality to be experienced in the flesh out there, in the streets and alleys where want and need reside. The joy of doing compassion is known by its giver. The compassionate possesses the right keys to unlock the right chambers of the heart where it stays hidden. The miser does not miss that joy simply for the reason that his hands are empty but because those hands have squeezed and crushed the keys rendering them unable to open the larger stores of his bounty in his heart. The Christian believer may recall the Lord’s words, “If anyone gives so much as a cup of cold water to one of these little ones because he is a disciple, then in truth I tell you, he will most certainly not go without his reward” (Mt 10:42).

 

Doing compassion looks good. It is plausible. Giving and sharing with our fellow human being what we have is a mark of commendable philanthropy.  But doing that in the name of Jesus is even nobler. KWAUSO cannot be aiming at anything inferior to that. The next essay will try to bring that out.

 

    

   
Ma Justina Mukahigi.  

Above is a picture of my mother, Ma Justina Mukahigi. When I asked her what she thought if I could propose to the Bishop the Kashambya grassland as place for building the school I had mentioned to her earlier on, she supported the idea saying: “For that is the place where we used to cultivate the special groundnuts “nshoro”. When she died in February 2014, I informed Gregory Folley, a strong benefactor of her demise. In response, Gregory promised his prayers and sent me funds to build something for her memory. Those are the funds that were used to build the upper floor of the administration, the part that is seen in the picture above. On completion of the construction a third of that upper floor was allocated for the library, the second part a computer room and the third part a physics room.

  


                         Second floor being added onto the first following Greg’s donation for Ma Justina’s memorial.

 



        

Students in front of the administration building close to the Bishop Timanywa classroom block.

 63.EDUCATE THE YOUTH AT A GOSPEL FLAVORED SCHOOL   

1) For a Gospel flavored school: It was in the mind of the founder of KWAUSO right from the time of its conception, that the school would be a service in the hands of Bukoba Catholic Diocese and attuned to go beyond the horizons of mere philanthropy. It never occurred to his mind, that this school would be established as a private opportunity for his economic gain. For that reason, getting the personnel to manage and organize its running without distorting its direction presented itself as a challenge of primary consideration. It was imperative to try getting self-less imitators of the One to whom the school is dedicated.

 

2)The first attempts: The first thought went to a religious congregation that would be ready to work under the Diocese for no personal lucrative gains. As the school was planned as co-education facility, it would be enough looking for any religious congregation whether male or female. The Bishop, Nestor Timanywa was ready for either.  He authorized me to look for a Congregation that could fit into our desired categories. That way, started the long march. He gave me a letter addressed to the Superior of one Congregation of Sisters in Uganda. I took the letter by hand to the Superior of that Congregation. I gave the bishop’s letter to her and explained our case. The answer was not immediate. She needed time to consult with at least a few members of her advisory committee. I spent the night there. On the following day the answer came. After considering the facts, that we had no complete structures to accommodate the sisters in a Convent and the scarcity of the competent personnel available the Congregation was not in the position to give us the help we were looking for. It was also said that even if the accommodation will be found the Congregation should own the school and determine its running policy.

 

All summed up, the conditions sounded unacceptable to me and after the report of my findings the bishop did not seem enthusiastic about the terms set by the Congregation. As a consequence, the option was abandoned.

 

After that, the bishop sent met to Kenya with the same kind of request to a different Congregation of sisters who were operating one school in Tanzania. Even that plan did not work either. While still in Kenya I was directed to another religious Brothers Congregation. I went to their generalate to try my lack, though without appointment. The Superior General was not at home. But again, the answer was not the best for our purposes. So, I had no way of not returning home empty handed.Then the Bishop thought of contacting one Congregation of Brothers based in Uganda. He gave me a letter that again I took with me by hand. I brought the request to the superior. Again, the conditions set by the superior were hard and I returned the way I had gone and reported my failure to the bishop.

 

2)Alternative options: Shortly later I paid a courtesy visit to the Treasurer General of the Diocese, Fr. Peter Mutashobya. We talked about the progress of the construction of the school and the financial difficulties the project was going through.  In due course I also mentioned the problem of getting the personnel to run it. Fr. Peter wondered why we could not think of looking for a reliable non-religious person in good standing to entrust the job. I took this suggestion to the bishop. The idea was acceptable and the bishop assigned me the task of trying to look for such a person. I got a good candidate in the person of a recently retired Secondary School Headmaster, equipped with the right credentials and talked to him about what we would expect from him in the light of the mission of our School as an instrument to promote the honor of the merciful Face of Our Lord.  The man expressed his willingness and readiness to work with us indicating though that he had another commitment, which however, in his estimation was not likely to disadvantage his performance as Headmaster. That major step accomplished, I brought his name to the bishop who endorsed the proposal without hesitation.  Apparently, the man was not a stranger to the bishop.  Together with this man we started putting up in place the necessary facilities for opening the school.  About three months in our agreement, the man was disturbed by the prospects of getting yet another extra commitment and started doubting his ability of attending all the three jobs efficiently. We sat together again and we came to the final understanding that it was wiser trying to look for another candidate.

 

3)Finally: At that, I went to the bishop to report the disappointing news. I had a difficult option to suggest. I asked him if he could possibly think of assigning a priest at KWAUSO as Headmaster. The government criteria were to be considered.  He asked me if I had a thought. The opinion I suggested could not be accepted because that person was holding a delicate task. I mentioned some three other names and the bishop said he would know how to handle the matter. Some three days later he told me Fr. Marcel Kaberwa would be the first Headmaster of KWAUSO Secondary School. I celebrated. Fr. Marcel was there to receive the first students as they reported on February 28, 2024.

 

4)Later headmasters:      After Fr. Marcel a couple of Headmasters followed. The second Headmaster was Fr. Marianus Rutagwelera who was succeeded by Fr. Remigius Rutashubanyuma. Then came Fr. Profilius Mulokozi who was followed by Fr. Denis Rweyunga as the fifth Headmaster. More will still come. I pray that in their hands the original intention of KWAUSO will not be diverted.

 

 5)School Board of Directors:  In keeping with the Government rules and regulations all schools are run by the Board of Directors. At KWAUSO the members of the Board have always worked together the Executive Director who was the Founder of the School together with the Headmasters and the school administration as such. They are appointed to occupy their office for periods of four years.

A group picture of students in front of one classroom block

64 

             


             

     
  



Frank and  Amy Pala and daughter Megan

with Fr. Stan in the snow after bringing

in some computers from Retrotech Inc.

Richard Noe, Alig and two other members of the   Knights of Columbus at Metamora who helped with the transportation of the computers to St. Mary’s Church in El Paso, Illinois.

65. PLAN A TIMELINE WHILE LISTENING TO PROVIDENCE  

  

Shortly after I had made known my intention to work on the school project a friend approached me with the question: You have embarked on a noble cause. I wish you the best success.  But what is your timeline like? When do you think you will finish this work? In how many phases do you break up your work? How do you fix the beginning of your phases and their respective completion?

 

Well intentioned as it was, the question was not new to me. All I was aware of was that it was an important question. But I had no answer.  I could estimate how much money would be required. But I had no idea when and where it was going to come from. While I had ideas building up in the head, I did not have a single cent to back up them up. I had no pledges or promises from anybody to put my confidence in. I had no share in any investment Group. I had no business. I did not know how to play bingo. I entrusted everything to Providence. I would therefore not feel offended if anybody described this initiative a leap into the open. Despite that, I planned big. Yet, when now I look at what we have, I see more than I had expected. Providence has given more than my imagination. It gives the impression that at times Providence walks with leaps and bounds in such a way that those who walk behind him feel they need to adjust their own steps. This is a different way of saying that, in Providence there is fullness of generosity.

 

One of the clearest signs that Providence was ready to intervene in his inscrutable ways was the arrival of unsolicited little children who came seeking me at the rectory, St. Vincent de Paul Parish on May 2, 2005 whom shall see in the next essay. When I consider their age and the magnitude of their offer and the fact that I had not told them anything about my plan to build a school to the honor of the merciful Face of Our Lord my heart is prompted to a shudder.  The unprecedented support from the Parish Congregation that followed that seed money from those “little angels” as well as the enthusiastic morale of the people who showed their readiness to give a helping hand were more indicators of the providential backing.

 

And after all that, Providence did not retreat.  I could see his supporting presence in the way we obtained the land, given to the Diocese at the Bishop’s request without paying money for it.  We saw electric power come to KWAUSO at a request. The number of students grew by the year as the school picked up confidence in delivering.

 

Providence has revealed himself to us through what each one of you has given in supporting KWAUSO. Each one of you has been the hand of Providence.

 

Originally the plan was to build a school capable of accommodating 376 students distributed over  six classes in two streams at each grade like this:  Form I, 2 streams @ 35 students; Form II, 2 streams @35 students;  Form III, 2 streams @35 students; Form IV, 2 streams @35 students; Form V, 2 streams @24 students and Form VI, 2 streams @24 students. Form II, 2 streams @35 students;

 

But with the turn of things, KWAUSO boasts of over 620 students, all at Ordinary Level (i.e. Form I-Form IV, in roughly four streams at each grade).  Advanced Level classes (Form V-VI) are still to be planned. The tremendous increase in the numbers and quality of performance are matters to thank Providence for.  Then the most recent development speaks loud and clear of the great favor of Providence we have all witnessed: The building of one ultra-beautiful church for prayer activities at KWAUSO for all the years to come. More will be said about this miracle in some essays yet to follow. We have unwaveringly paved our way all in the lead of Providence determined to do all the best within our power to bring some hope to “those little one of his”. And our trust has not gone down in vain.

 

 




 

 

Bishop Nestor Timanywa (on left) welcomed David Kraft at Ntungamo Bishop’s residence. Fr. Stanislaus pictured on right.

     

Frank & Amy Pala, El Peso in Illinois.            

Great friends whose time has been generously

consumed to make sure the school project

keeps going.

             

Doris Hass (left) with friends. Doris   Haas introduced  me to the Company of Retrotech in Peoria which gave me 100 used computers for KWAUSO and helped in getting the container for transporting them home.

 

 

                                                                                                                                         .

 

 

67.TWENTYONE UNEXPECTED   PRE-SCHOOL LITTLE ANGELS 

1) A surprise visit of Little Children: It occurred at St. Vincent de Paul Parish in Peoria on May 12, 2005 around 11:00 a.m. I was reading in my room when an intercom phone rung normally from the secretary in the office. She wanted me to come out and meet visitors who had come to the rectory looking for me. On the phone, she told me they were waiting for me in the hallway but she did not to say who the visitors were. My response was prompt all the same. Exited, I went to meet my visitors, whoever they might be.  As I appeared, my visitors greeted me all loud and clear as in one voice, “Good morning, Father” amid some kind of relaxed chatter.  Here are my visitors for sure; little boys and girls, glittering faces, all eager and happy to meet me. I noticed they had a partially concealed bag for me which they were soon going to reveal. But my head told me they were much younger than I had imagined at the reception of the secretary’s phone call. The visitors all looked between four and five years of age. They were Pre-School children.  I had hardly responded to their greeting than one boy among them without wasting time raised up a placard above their heads to let me read for myself their message to me. Judging by the handwriting, the placard must have been prepared by their teacher or someone older than the little angels.  The placard read, “We saved our money all year long. We saved $100. Now we’re giving it to you – to help you build your school”. At the same time, two of their colleagues brought forward a plastic bag signaling it was meant for me so I could take it. The bag looked very heavy for them. Inside the bag was a collection of coins: dimes, pennies, quarters and a couple of dollars, all totaling $100. This was my money from the children. With deep gratitude I received the children’s unsolicited gift and after my words of gratitude my visitors bade me goodbye saying: “See you later, Father”, and left.

 

2) Enduring impact: It was joy within me. Thoughts in my head run wild. I wondered how these little children had got to know the secret hidden in my mind that I was planning to build a school that would be dedicated to the honor of the merciful Face of our Lord. I had not asked them to give me their money. I had not received any funds from anybody except one donation from one old friend Werner Zimmer of Griesborn in Germany, to whom I had revealed my desire and who had promised me $100. My thoughts flew to another dimension: I saw in the gift of these children the hand of Providence. Memories of Fr. Rinaldi’s 1992 prayer before the altar at Corpus Christi church flashed back to my mind, just as also the image of the children walking back to their homes from school that afternoon in Bukoba, when the challenge to light a candle for their young brothers and sisters pricked my heart.  I persuaded myself to think that the time had now returned for me to do something tangible in response to Fr. Rinaldi’s prayer that challenged me some almost thirteen years earlier to do something for the people as part of my endeavor to promote the Shroud apart.

 

 Some words of Psalm 8 flashed across my consciousness immediately after the children left as I took my money with me into the chapel, adjacent to the Secretary’s office. I knew a bible was kept there.  I opened the bible to confirm the text that my mind had led me to: “Lord our Lord, how majestic is your name in all the earth! You have set your glory in the heavens. Through the praise of children and infants you have established a stronghold against your enemies, to silence the foe and the avenger” (Ps. 8:1-2). The truth is, it is the children’s gift that gave me the courage to reveal my dream of building the school to the people. The idea had been cooking in my head for months. I was that this idea had the Bishop’s approbation till that day but I had not known how to dare reveal it. The children’s visit on that day put the words into my mouth, so I could begin to talk about KWAUSO School Project in the public.

 

3) The logic of giving: It was obvious that, in all prudence, I could not keep and own the money from the children behind the awareness of their parents. So, what I did first and foremost was to tell my fellow associate priest at the Parish about the unprecedented generosity of the children when he returned to the rectory. He was happy. Together we arranged getting the diocesan authorities informed about this matter and seek permission to tell the parents about what had happened. We informed the Diocese the same day. The Diocese was excited about it and the permission to talk to the parents was granted immediately. At the weekend Masses, within two weeks later I told the story to the parents. The parents were so moved at hearing about the generosity of their children. They did not need too many words to see that their children’s $100 was unable to build a school. For that reason, they gave their contributions to top up their children’s offer so the project might start. Looking at the events retrospectively I see the hand of Providence. I see the beginning of the answer of Fr. Rinaldi’s impromptu prayer at Corpus Christi Church in Port Chester. But, at the same time, the participation of all members of the Parish opened up my eyes to one important lesson, namely the Logic of giving which we shall treat in the following reflection.

 

 

Above: The placard by the 2005 Pre-K children who gave me the surprise gift of $100 to build KWAUSO, on May 12, 2005 (The placard got damaged years later in my boxes).

 

               

        68                                                 

  Chiara Molfese Pavan,                                Paula Freepartner, Seneca in Illinois                                                                             Murelle di Villa Nova, Padova.                       Seneca in Illinois.

 







  
                                                                  

  

69. INITIATIVES SECURED BY CONSISTENCY AND THE TRUST OF DONORS  

       

1)Obligated: To their gift, the little children who, as clarified in the above essay, came to visit me at St. Vincent de Paul Parish attached an important note, written in the clearest characters for anybody to read. The note said: “Now we’re giving it (our money) to you to help you to build your school”. Their message could not be clearer. Before their offer that money was theirs. Through their act of giving the money became mine but it was not supposed to remain mine in my pocket. I had to use it to build the school. I had to understand that, from their point of view, this money was a gift given freely; but from my own point of view, it was an obligation. By their physical coming to place into my hands their gift, wrapped in love and respect, those little angels were telling me that they wanted me to receive their money, raw material as it was, in order to process and pass it on to others in the form a School, probably for some unnamed children like themselves. I could call that one part of the logic of giving. They did not give their gift to be wasted. They put what they held precious into the hands of somebody they believed capable of consistently making it produce due fruits; to benefit others and that way propagate good. They believed their money would be put into building a school and they would most probably be disappointed to hear that for example their money ended up in buying a chopper or a bicycle.

 

3)Engaging stewardship: Closely bound to that part of the logic of giving is trustworthiness of the receiver on the one hand and trust on the part of the giver. While acknowledging the nobility of the gift from the children, one must admit also that, taken alone, the amount of money the children gave was not big enough to build a school. After receiving I had to work to make sure the goal was realized. The money I received gave me the courage to stand before the parents and talk about the magnitude of the real need.  And when I picked up the courage to talk the parents responded whole heartedly to back up the generosity of their children. The fact that they did so, made me understand that, even if for no reason they had observed, those people saw in me someone who could be trusted, and therefore, on my part, I was supposed to make sure I acted consistently to have the two ends of the logic of giving lock in for a noble circle of Generosity-trustworthiness-trust-Generosity.

 

Simply stated, all that means this: An initiative that depends on the support of several individuals will ignite from the outpouring of the generosity of the people themselves coupled with the trustworthiness of the person or group of persons championing the initiative.  That, in turn, will further fuel the generosity of the same people or possibly even more of them depending on the goals of the initiative as well as the means and limitations of those who see any sense in it and are ready to participate. I could say that KWAUSO has traced that kind of course, for which we ought to thank the Lord.  But as any human initiative on earth, KWAUSO is not immune from all possible dangers that might lead to stumbling. Lack of candor in the operations, for example, might lead to some draw back if due care is not made to rectify or amend the strayed movements at the various levels of its development.

 

4)Hopes and expectations: We hope digration does not happen. Rather, we pray that KWAUSO will grow as with consistency of intention and faithfulness, always focused on its goals.  KWAUSO will grow even in terms of its ability for self-sustenance as well as the breadth and quality of service. Things go well if the intention of the donor is respected and the promises are kept. So long as the original intention of KWAUSO is honestly maintained, KWAUSO will remain KWAUSO. The danger is that in the name of improvement all kinds of arguments including distortions might be advanced to introduce things into KWAUSO. In those moments, one of the best ways of escaping from the quagmire of deception is responding to ourselves with the answer to the question as to why this school was built as KWAUSO: Through and to the honor of the merciful Face of Our Lord – meant to serve all but especially those whom our heart feels untroubled to call His true little ones as will be shown in the following essay.

         

        

 

   

 

Representatives of Itahwa Village Administrative authorities offered the requested land to the Diocese under Bishop Nestor Timanywa for the building of the school.  In the pictures above the Diocese takes possession of the land as Bishop Timanywa blesses the stone pitched in the ground amid prayers and applause of all the people in attendance including the ward councilor, the village chairman and administrative secretary on the one hand, some Diocesan personnel including the Bishop himself, his Vicar General, later Bishop Almachius Rweyongeza of Kayanga Diocese, the Bishop’s Secretary Fr. Adeodatus Rwehumbiza and the local Parish Priest, Fr. Lucas Mulokozi. The other priests present were Msgr. Justinian Bamanyisa, Fr. Leonard Kalikawe, Fr. Edmund Mutalemwa  and Fr. Fulgens Rutatekururwa, the Construction advisor.  Fr. Stanislaus led the Song to the Divine Mercy, “Love Divine all Loves Excelling”.

 

Primary school children from the neighboring school of Itahwa were there to witness the event.

Fr. Lucas Mulokozi, P.P. at Itahwa Parish was charged to bring the first construction  stones at the Site early 2008.

William Feruzi, Managing Director of Arch Plan International Ltd, Dar es salaam would be the architect.

 





71.ORIGINAL CONCEPTION FIRMLY BUTTRESSED ON THE WINGS OF HOPE          

 

1)To remain focused: KWAUSO is a co-educational boarding secondary school registered under the legal ownership of Bukoba Catholic Diocese in the Kagera Region, Tanzania. Hence the legal owner of KWAUSO Secondary School is the present Bishop of Bukoba Diocese or his successor. It offers education and formation according to the acceptable Catholic faith and tradition. KWAUSO is not ready to conduct its ministry according to the ultramodern view of things. KWAUSO will be led by someone with a conviction; a reliable individual whether layman, a religious (man/female) or priest appointed by the Diocese and answerable to the appropriate Diocesan authority; someone who can swim against the current; someone who will work to ensure the integrity of the community rather than succumb to the pursuit of cheap popularity.

 

While the School conducts its activities as a Catholic school, KWAUSO admits children of all religions. The parents or sponsors of the child must be well informed before the child is admitted. In other words, no child will be discriminated against for reasons of their religious allegiance. Once admitted, the child is expected to abide by the rules and regulations of the School. No student will be coerced to register themselves at KWAUSO and the School will not force any registered student to remain KWAUSO. All of the students will wear the same kind of uniform. The students will mix and live together as brothers and sisters. Rules will be set to regulate the student’s conduct as morally upright and balanced citizens. They will all study, work and   play together.

 

2)Careful recruitment criteria: Recruitment of collaborators would be done carefully so that the spirit of the students will be kept upright and their integrity protected.  Teachers who hold beliefs that go against the formation KWAUSO wants to offer would not be allowed to work KWAUSO. Normal prudence would advise such teachers to look for their employment elsewhere. Teachers or other formators with the tendency to steal or involve in other forms of misconduct even after corrective efforts have been offered will not be given a chance to continue working with KWAUSO.

 

As KWAUSO is dedicated to the honor of the merciful Face of Jesus Christ our Lord common prudence will advise a person who is opposed to this not to join the team of workers at the school.

 

3)Self sustainability: KWAUSO is an outcome of many sacrifices and a lot of sweat from many people. The funds that have enabled the School to stand have been given gratis for the cause of good. For that reason, KWAUSO will not be considered an economic venture. It is not going to be a means of gaining personal profit to individuals. The teacher or other member who dreams of turning it into a lucrative instrument for personal gain may understand that it is not right to abuse this institute. It will be right if the authorities that assign the workers or heads of KWAUSO remaining vigilant on this matter so that KWAUSO may not be turned into a business market. Furthermore, it will be good to remember that our donors have not promised us endless flow of donations. The time may have to come when the donations stop. For that reason, KWAUSO will be obliged to look for ways for self-sustainability.

 

 

Above: A sketch of the original conception of general building layout by founder in 2004

Above: A group picture of students  the second year of KWAUSO’s inauguration. Form I & II,  (2013).

Below:  The funds were meagre. We could not afford big machinery for water drilling. Our only option: Do it manually by augur. Finally, we got the water. The Pedrollo submersible pump came from the general funds.  The Honda petrol generator to power it was donated by Phillip and Paula Steele, pictured on page 76, below.

 

                 

 

                         

 

73.NURTURING A CARING CULTURE FOR A BROTHER OR SISTER IN NEED

          

1)The School motto:  We believe that the education we acquire will profit many. Hence the school motto is: “Education for Responsible Service of others”. It is our intention to form the children who attend our School to grow and mature as citizens who feel obliged to use their talents their education acquired at KWAUSO to serve each other. It is therefore natural to expect that throughout the entire course of their Secondary School Formation at KWAUSO the children will be taught to use their ability for the sake of all.  The school curriculum will set aside enough time for each student to learn various skills and engage in manual work conscious that the education they acquire is not intended to make them attain intellectual excellency alone but enable them to live a life that seriously takes into account the needs and aspirations of their brothers and sisters. The school will attract the students not to end up at thinking of their own needs but also of others. If it is natural to pursue what is profitable to ourselves, the education received will build within their consciousness the understanding that they are not alone in this world. We are all in the world together with others. For that reason, a fortune shared with others is more fulfilling than a benefit grabbed for my exclusive ascent. Education for service of others gets full expression in nurturing a culture where the individual strives at caring for the brother or sister.

 

Yet our motto speaks of a responsible service.  This goes to stress two facts.  The well-educated will feel obliged to serve. They will serve as they ought. But they will not serve in order to make the others become irresponsible. The hard worker reaps the fruits their hard work while laziness reaps poverty. For that reason, responsible service calls for wisdom. Service should be able to generate service and not exploitation of other people’s generosity to serve. When service is given the opportunity to stand it generates service and through its continued reciprocity we end up building a culture of mutual care, where each feels even ready to sacrifice the self for the other.

      

2)One memorable incident: It was joy when after a long time of manual drilling water was finally found.  The next question was how to pump the water to the surface. We needed a submersible pump.  Since submersible pumps were not locally available, I had to plan a trip to a place where I could buy one and at the same time to look for teachers, preferable a religious Congregation that could take care of the running of the school in the name of the Diocese as has already been said above. Our choice was one congregation based in Nairobi, Kenya.

 

I travelled by boat to Mwanza, took a bus in the morning and made connection with another one at the border between Tanzania and Kenya. It is known as Silari.  The journey from Sirali to Nairobi started in the evening.  It came to pass that on our way to Nairobi, shortly before midnight our bus was ambushed. The driver was forced to drive into the bush. There, we were forced to evacuate the bus one after the other. We were despoiled of all the valuables we had in our bags. In the course of the pillage some of us were injured and left bruised. Fortunately, none was killed. Some of us who got injured still bear the scars of the wounds that were endured on their very skin as a testimony of what happened to them that unhappy night. It was painful that night but later scars could be seen as marks of valor or signatures left on their bodies that make individual recall the fact that they were on that bus that night. I too was on that bus, going to search for a Congregation that the Diocese could entrust with the administration of KWAUSO.

 

3)Not all in vain: I was left penniless. But it did not all end up in vain. After getting what they wanted from us the thugs disappeared in the bush leaving us free to continue our journey. We left the spot all alive, thanking God that the worst that could have happened did not befall us. Once in Nairobi I rung the Secretary General of AMECEA now Msgr. Pius Rutechura who graciously came to my aid and took me in at the AMECEA Headquarters. Later he lent me the money to buy a Pedrollo submersible pump from the Davis & Shirtliff pump dealers for our water borehole project, plus the amount I needed to accomplish my activities in Nairobi. 

 

 

 72

 










 

    

Students at self-reliance exercise. They dig a trench           Self-reliance: Students work in cutting grasses        for installation of a water pipe from the borehole pump.   with their sickles.

 

  

They take care of their compound by digging.              Study time in class.  

 

                 

 

              Students on a study tour at Kagera Sugar factory.

 

 














75.OPENNESS AND AVAILABILITY TO THE CHALLENGE OF THE RELIC                                                                                           

 

    

 

 

 

 For a believer the Shroud is a unique relic and a magnificent symbol of transcendent truths.  And it is as beautiful as it is eloquent. Its voice is soft and sweet. Gazing at the Shroud the believer can almost hear a reverberation of Jesus’ words, “Love one another as I have loved you” (Jn. 13:34). A reflection on those words, in the light of the Shroud, can make anybody tremble and even probably think of escaping away, because if what we see in the Shroud is a correct symbol the love our Lord is talking about, then we must admit that the challenge before us is exceedingly huge. For he has not only loved us unto death, but unto this kind of death – death that left his body terribly lacerated and his being humiliated beyond all telling.  And that is what KWAUSO wants to remind us of.

 

KWAUSO sends us back to the Shroud that challenges us to action.

 76

 

 











 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

          

Above:Paula Steele;  Right: Philip Steele                                Joy Morland

Behind them is a picture of the Divine Mercy similar                              A generous mother and friend of KWAUSO.

To the one which hangs big and majestic in our Church at                      Both Joy and her husband Raymond share the

KWAUSO. These kind hearts have made me their family                      same opinion of the importance of  KWAUSO

member.                                                                                                    With the Steele’s family.

 

Below: Lucinda Piotrowski d/o                                               

Philip & Paula Steele

 

   

KWAUSO  students with Fr. Stanislaus (in cassock) pose in front of the           Shrine of the Shroud Replica.  They are given the education that is proper.  Effort needs to be made to ensure that these children will be well formed academically, morally and humanly while putting the most desirable emphasis on having them build their life on the correct spiritual values.

77. FIX THE KEENER EYE ON THE LESS FORTUNATE IN THE AREA  

The school that seeks to promote the honor of the Merciful Face of our Lord as manifested in the Shroud cannot be just any kind of school. It needs to be a properly focused school that will be able to bring out the taste of compassion that the believer associates with the Man of the Shroud. For the person who holds the Shroud of Turin to be the very cloth that wrapped the body of Christ as he lay in the tomb the image in the Shroud is a selfie of Jesus, the master of all compassion. Jesus is known to have had a keener eye to the disadvantaged. The Gospels are filled with narratives that put into relief the truth that Jesus was full of compassion.

 

For example, it is reported about him in the Gospel of John that at the pool called Bethesda in Jerusalem it is the man who had been suffering for thirty eight years without getting any assistance that stole his attention and saved him from the hazards of remaining in an endless queue. The evangelist writes. Jn 5:3ff “under these were crowds of sick people blind, lame, paralyzed.  One man there had an illness which had lasted thirty-eight years, and when Jesus saw him lying there and knew he had been in that condition for a long time, he said, ‘Do you want to be well again?’  ‘Sir’, replied the sick man, ‘I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is disturbed; and while I am still on the way, someone else gets down there before me’. Jesus said ‘Get up, pick up your sleeping-mat and walk around’. The man was cured at once and he picked up his mat and started to walk around’. The man was cured at once, and he picked up his mat and started to walk around.” The gist of the narrative is too obvious to be missed.  Jesus had a keener eye for the individual in greater need. It is clear from this that a school dedicated to honor him cannot fail to try to imitate him. A school that fails to distinguish the more disadvantaged individuals from the normal cases for closer attention would miss an important quality for being called KWAUSO and should not be called by that name.

 

It might not be KWAUSO’s task to abolish poverty in the world but when KWUSO fails to look into the eyes of the needy in all seriousness and allow itself to be guided by honest concern for them it must shed its name and wear another one.  There is a saying that times change and we must change with them. Now, as time passes, someone might come out with the argument that our times are different from what we had when KWAUSO was being conceived and therefore it is imperative to rethink our recruitment policies of the children to study at KWAUSO so we can work less with the poor and concentrate on those who are able to give more money, provided that the move pushes KWAUSO to the top in the nation judged by its academic performance. But I am afraid, by that logic the pride of KWAUSO as a school meant to keep its keener eye towards the less financially fortunate section of our society will disappear together with the name itself and what the name stands for. There is nothing wrong having a school that does not have room for a keener eye towards those who have less, but the good thing is that such a school would not be called KWAUSO in our sense of the name.                               

 

 78






 

   

 

 

 

     

Msgr. Sylvester Rutabanzibwa, Shroud enthusiast             Work on the second floor, boys’ dormitory starts

looks at the construction work with satisfaction.                goes on.                                   

.   

 

 

Volunteer Charity Group of Catechists Murelle di Villa Nova, Padova, Italy: Collaborators of

Maria Grazia Franco, long time KWAUSO supporter, pictured here, big smile on the right.

 

79.BUILD MINDS NOW FOR GREATER PROSPERITY LATER

 

As we think of KWAUSO we think of its impact on the children it is trying to form. Its true value will be measured by the fruits of its work.  If what we are today is a mirror of the complete set of influences that together molded us yesterday, we are a product of our yesterday. And if polished minds are capable of thinking straight goals, then the foundation of tomorrow’s prosperity must be laid today through the efforts we make in polishing the minds of the coming generation.   For that reason, when we decide to build a school, we cannot forget that the future of the children entrusted to our care and instruction as a school is in our hands and we are called upon to assume this task with a sense of great responsibility and accountability. Our school will have to consider offering each child an integral formation. The school will have to be sufficiently equipped to transform our children’s mind academically, elevate their heart spiritually and protect the uprightness of  their conscience morally. All that carries with it interesting implications.  For a child that is received from parents who have already given him/her a good educative foundation, our school will be a proper school to further on the good work that will have already started. For a child who was has not been equally lucky, our school will serve as a real life-changer in the various aspects and levels of their formation.

 

   But in order to achieve this, it will be necessary to ensure wise recruitment of knowledgeable teachers who are able to do more than mercenary-type fact tellers. It will demand carefully building up a staff of honest collaborators and knit together a reliable team of committed formators. Besides, to avoid ending up with half-cooked results and malformed products the school will have to enjoy a healthy environment of both the infrastructure and discipline.  The school will need to be neat and good-looking, for if the infrastructure including furniture and landscaping are crumbled and shapeless they send a message of distortion to the mind of the child that will be assimilated as normal. As a result, disorder in the affairs is likely to be the accepted order in concrete living and the consequences in the later life of the child might be disastrous, since normalized disorder and right order are not interchangeable. Moreover, if the student is left to be guided by his/her unguided instincts under the pretext of the promotion of freedom, the very sense of the school as a place for imparting education and a proper up-bringing will be lost. In short, all of the indicators the great educators hold to be advantageous and of true value need to be respected for the success of our initiative.

        

 78

 

 









 80



 

 

 

  

Gregory Folley visits KWAUSO. Receives a warm welcome by the community. Bishop Method Kilaini, is there to welcome him. On the right Philip and Paula Steele enjoy their light moment to talk to Bishop Nestor Timanywa while Fr. Stanislaus introduces the Bishop to the couple and the later to the former.

 

    

 Two boys’ dormitory blocks in the foreground  and two girls’ dormitories on the other side. Between the two sides is seen the rear side of the church.

 

81. EXCELLENCE OF ASPIRATION CAPTURED BY SYMBOL         

To the scientist the Shroud is an archeological artefact that can be studied by the empirical method even if its final explanation remains an enduring enigma. To the believer the Shroud is a sign that, visualized from a still higher level, is an object that reveals itself to us as a symbol pointing to more stunning realities beyond itself that call for an ever more involving meditation. Now, if KWAUSO is associated with the Shroud, what inspiration can the school draw from the artifact? A saying goes, “Like father, like the son”. In a kind of analogical sense, as the Shroud is an icon. Rich in symbolism, the aspirations of KWAUSO could better be understood by looking at the wealth of the symbolism that surrounds it. The following are some of the symbols embedded in the school of KWAUSO.

 

1) Openness  and friendship: The symbolism of openness and friendship is embedded in the very layout of the school buildings. Whoever approaches the school through the main gate is made welcome by the broad embrace expressed by the positioning of the front buildings. Like the outstretched arms of a person bidding the visitor “Come on in” the outermost classroom blocks on both sides protrude closest to the front fence of the campus. The fundamental message behind that is this:  KWAUSO has no place for discrimination, which however does not mean that at KWAUSO hospitality is offered without wisdom and prudence. Pressed in towards the inner center of the campus follow the second twin buildings on both sides forming an unmistakable overlapping configuration relative to the two exterior ones. Further in stands the administration block, running lengthwise parallel to the front boundary of the School premises. 

 

  2) Compassion: The Symbolism of compassion cannot be missed by the keen eye observing the central section of the administration building. At the first glance the visitor’s eye meets the word “KWAUSO”, which understandably tells the fact that the visitor is now at KWAUSO, a School built “through and to the honor of the Merciful face of our Lord”. Besides the large letters forming the name of the School, the visitor is struck by two large round glass windows at the level of the first floor in the administration building itself. One thinks of two wide open eyes. Completely round the shape of the blue grass symbolizes thorough vision because full light is received into the eye. The clear glass surrounding the round part puts accent to the imagery that we are looking at an eye where the tinted part is the iris. But this iris is tinted. The tinted element symbolizes the softness of the thoroughly penetrating vision. The host sees everything and nothing is left hidden. Despite that, he is inviting. He is welcoming:  which anybody might understand as expressive of wonderful compassion that belongs to the Lord himself.  By this, the visitor is drawn into the intuition that KWAUSO will continually remind the people dwelling within its walls of our Lord’s compassion - a truth that in turn challenges the institution itself to the spirit of brotherly compassion in the execution of its operations.

 

3) The joy of self-giving and mutual service/school logo: At left of the porch on the administration block is the school logo. Unmistakable on this log is the map of Africa. Equally unmistakable is an image of two persons at the North-west corner of the map. The two persons are trying to reach out to each other. The two legs of the person standing at the higher level are well anchored on top of the map.  Evidently the person is making every effort to pull up the other one from falling away into the unknown. In the meantime, the individual who is assisted to rise up is struggling to climb. His leg gets support on the word “KWAUSO”. The two individuals are trying their best. Both are involved. And if there is at least one thing that is emotionally shared between the two colleagues it is the joy of each seeing the other play their part. All that goes to symbolize the goal of KWAUSO which is the promotion of education that ends up in forming the students to love serving others and bringing joy and greater prosperity into the life of each.  Getting it done requires concerted struggle and sacrifice from both sides.  KWAUSO must exert a good deal of effort.  Like a lever pivoted at the center “KWAUSO” here symbolized by the letters composing its name, is depicted as working hard to help the child whose foot is anchored on its name to rise. That KWAUSO has a price to pay is symbolized by the tilt of the word “KWAUSO” which in the logo does not lie horizontal as it ought.

 

4)  Aspiration for high academic achievement - The library at a raised level

 

KWAUSO is supposed to lead the children from the level of being satisfied by receiving information about the phenomena in the world that surround us to that of captivating the desire for an inner transformation capable of drawing our gaze onto the things that endure beyond the tangible. To symbolize that, the classrooms and laboratories where prescribed academic instruction is given are found at ground level to symbolize that, the education we impart is down to earth. Nothing peculiar about that. But to complement what is still missing the student is challenged to raise up their eyes. There is more in the library “up there”. For that reason, the library is located at a higher floor.  Then after the best has been acquired from the library “up there” the student walks out as if “ accomplished”  in as far as intellectual pursuits are concerned, only to realize that there is yet a still higher level to ascend: which is the encounter with the mystery of God’s plan which the individual can contemplate after crossing the bridge from the library and rising to an even higher level accessible by rising from the bridge (same level with the library as can be seen in the picture on the next page) to the Shroud Shrine top part where the Shroud face triangular prism is located. There again we note that the prism is rotating in the wind to show that the mystery of God itself is elusive. Human intellect does not succeed in comprehending it thoroughly. It is a mystery.  (Continued on page 82, bottom)

 82



 

 

  

 

======================================

5)  Shroud Replica and its Shrine: From knowledge to adoration: It has been said that KWAUSO  owes its foundation to the contemplation of the Shroud of Turin. We are fortunate to house its life-size Replica at KWAUSO in a Shrine specifically constructed for it. We hold the Shroud as a sign of signs and the symbol of symbols. It speaks of love and altruism. It is a summary of a whole tale of Jesus’ vicarious suffering and a confirmation of the truth that we do not lose anything when we give ourselves for others. The inscription on the Shrine read from below is borrowed from Fr. Peter Rinaldi who put the words “In Memory of His Death and Resurrection” at the entrance of his Shroud shrine at Corpus Christi church, Port Chester, in New York.

 

A claim exists that those whose faith is firm and established do not need the Shroud. In all justice this claim must be left to the qualified to confirm. In these matters it is not so easy for someone to speak on their behalf.  Yet in my experience I have witnessed many, who at least exteriorly seem to be strong in their faith being deeply touched by the Shroud. That experience leaves a strong message that somehow the encounter with the Shroud has the power to ignite a certain degree of positive change in the individual’s way of looking at things albeit for some moments.  Availability to respond to the igniting power of the Shroud does not seem to diminish or increase according to the intellectual capacity of the beholder.

 

The Shroud ignites the soul and heart of all who allow themselves to be available to it.

For that reason, after the intellectual bounty gained from the library located on the Administration building, the student who will have gained all the knowledge that is accessible through all the possible media including the library itself will feel thirsting for more knowledge. Such an individual will walk away from the library, cross a bridge that leads from the library to the upper level of the Shroud Shrine, then rising over three steps, to come into encounter with the Face of the Man of the Shroud mounted on a three-sided prism that rotates day and night so long as nature is there to provide the moving wind. And this the is face of him who once spoke to disciples “I am the truth, the way and the life”.  (Continue reading page 108 below)

 



83. LEARNING A LIFE OF SERVICING OTHERS AT KWAUSO  

 

It is rightly said that knowledge is power and is service too. Service is power in the hands of well prepared and properly disposed instruments of good, driven by the generosity and a good measure of self-giving. KWAUSO desires to be a nursery of such instruments. Admittedly, KWAUSO is a school where children are sent to study. But there is something special about this school. The children do not come to KWAUSO to simply read books but to be transformed by what they learn from them under the guidance of their educators to grow into instruments of good. Basically, these educators themselves in turn are guided by the general national education policies and directives. Without going against the Government norms, the student at KWAUSO is shaped according to a specific view of formation where service is set as a compass of what is delivered. The school motto runs: “Education for Responsible Service of Others” and its logo underpins that symbolically in picture form. KWAUSO draws from the lesson of service and prepares for service.

 

Service is no sign of mediocrity. On the contrary is a sign of strength.  The Master was not ambiguous about this. To make sure that it is not easily forgotten, he arranged to give a demonstrated lesson about it during his final hours with his friends. It was at the last supper. “Do you understand, he said, what I have done to you?  You call me Master and Lord, and rightly; so I am.  If I, then, the Lord and Master, have washed your feet, you must wash each other’s feet. I have given you an example so that you may copy what I have done to you” (Jn 13:12b-1). Very clear. Jesus knew that he is Lord and Master. His friends, the disciples knew it as well: None of them doubted he was their Lord and Master. Now he throws everything into the open:  They must copy his example. They will not diminish by doing so.  Service will not make them despicable. On the contrary, service will make them the commanders of their respective situations. Similarly, once accomplished the KWAUSO alumnus ought to become that. “The greatest among you will be your servant… (Mt 23:11-12) “Just as the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and give his life as a ransom for many” (Mt 20:28; Mark 10:4).

 

At KWAUSO the child will learn that we do not become smaller but worthier and more respectable when we serve others. Ways of achieving that are many and varied. The measure of my competence is the world that is accessible to me. As a student at school nobody will expect me to be lifting a sick person from the bed in the hospital to go to the bathroom or filling in a pothole on a rough road in the village a couple of kilometers from school. It is enough if I can study seriously and quietly in the classroom ready to help my friend who might be in need of my assistance at school but avoiding disturbing my fellow students who are trying to study. It is a good job if I take my hoe and dig where I ought to prepare a vegetable garden for later consumption by the whole community; If I clean my socks thoroughly so they do not stink to my fellow students as we sit in class; If I help out my neighbor who finds difficult in following a certain topic in class; If over and above doing assignments that are allocated to me by the community I can volunteer in attending some unforeseen chores that arise; If I can spontaneously  respond to the need of my fellow student. In short, readiness to respond to the demands of the situation without expecting a prize or remuneration is good enough.  Such activities are services and they smell power of the heart.

 

To prepare the student for becoming a success in life as a responsible servant, KWAUSO will foster his/her growth in the different traits of a good service which among others include commitment to duty, listening to the other, humility, trust, appreciation of other people’s good will and contribution, sense of stewardship, trustworthiness and integrity in general. The spirit of service founded on suchlike values liberates the individual with a solid academic support making him/her prompt to work on transforming the world around them with confidence to the joy of the beneficiaries as will be shown in the next essay.

      84





 

                                                               

                

 

         

 

 

 85. INDEBTED TO APPLAUD OUR BEFACTORS WITH AN ARIA

 

KWAUSO stands firm and strong, humble but confident enough to sing the praises of Divine compassion and Providence. But God has done this work through the hands his people.  They have given their sweat and offered what they needed. We cannot forget thanking them. A couple of years ago I composed a poem to honor them and posted it on the internet at our website: www.kwausoschool.org/support us    How I wish I could compose a gratitude aria to summarize my feelings about their gift in the universal language of music. They are many by name as individuals but at the heart they are one.  If I tried to mention the names one by one my list would count by hundreds of them from the various Parishes I was assigned to serve in the Diocese of Peoria. The Parishes that I reached include St. Patrick’s in La Salle; St Vincent de Paul in Peoria, St. John’s in Walnut and Immaculate Conception in Ohio Illinois, St. Mary’s in Metamora and St. Elizabeth’ in Washburn; St. Mary’s in El Paso Illinois, Immaculate Conception in Monmouth, St. Theresa’s in Alexis, St. Catherine’s in Aledo, St. Anthony’s in  Matherville, St. John’s in  Viola, St. Mary’s in Keithburg; St. Patrick’s, Urbana, St. Lawrence in Penfield; St. Patrick’s in Seneca and St. Mary’s in Kewanee.

 

A tribute to our supporters

 (Teach the Youth – Others to Serve)

Tribute we send, to you who're great of heart; we laud your support, and  thank  you too

Educating the youth, for the others to serve; very lofty a goal; that deserved a thought

All thinking right! Only how to start? For without the means, how can one march

Cause certainly fine, as all could say; though without a heart, too tough to brave

Hard work they love; who believe in good; all time they toil; for reaching afar

Teaching we sow; and as we know: service their harvest; humanity our dividends

Humanity’s the same; brothers and sisters; reciprocal serving; how miss the point

Excellence in wit; all youth may seek; but the knowledge to serve, let none forgo

You who yet doubt, or still new perhaps; lend us your hand, become part of this

Our hearts ’l jump; for joy will sing; when responsibly firm, the youth ‘l serve

Unfasten not, those belts maintain; good times or hard; never fall to surrender

The task is huge, you friends can see; no quitting to choose, but forward to mov’

Headway advance, together we’ll march; let’s finish the work, with joy conclude

 

A list of supporters - spiral of generosity

Below is a list of names of some of the project's supporters.  Some wanted to remain anonymous.  All have given from their heart. We pray that God will reward them for their good work. The diagram listing their names is in a form of a spiral to indicate that KWAUSO has grown as generosity built upon generosity.  Hence, one could describe the support that has led the School to its present looks as a spiral of generosity. At the origin of the Spiral come the names of Bishop Nestor Timanywa, the Ordinary, Bishop of Bukoba at the time of the opening of the project. who gave me the permission to embark on the project. His Vicar General was the later Bishop of Kayanga Diocese Bishop Almachius Rweyongeza. Auxiliary Bishop Method Kilaini was working in Dar es salaam by then but gave me tremendous advise. Then come the people of Itahwa village who gave us the plot for free to build the school. My Mother Justina Mukahigi come next and my sisters and brothers for their very close moral support. Then the Bukoba Diocesan clergy and later collaborators at the school after it had been built.

Thanks for supporting our initiative to educate the youth so they may grow to serve each other.

 

My mother, Ma Justina Mukahigi was my first benefactor because of what she is to me. She is pictured on the left, above.   She rejoiced when I told her that there was a plan to build a school called KWAUSO at Kashambya for children coming from modest income and commented that the choice of the location was perfect because “Kashambya is the place where we cultivated “enshoro”.   For the School my mother did not contribute a cent as she had none. But she contributed her whole self, heart and wisdom. And when she passed, upon receiving the news of her death, our friend Gregory Folley promised a good amount of donation to build a memorial of her.  When the promised money arrived, we used it to add the upper floor on a structure which was planned to serve as the administration block. By that time, the lefthand side of the ground floor section of the administration block was ready. The donation for her memorial was to cover the upper floor of that section. This was duly done without the tiling.  The ceramic tiles were added through a donation by Professor Giulio Fanti whose words have been used as the preface to this book.  

86









 

                               

     My mother, Ma Justina Mukahigi.           The Matty and Tamara Bruno Family.  Because of KWAUSO I

      On her 80th birthday.                                  became one of them. Their care and concern for me is a rarity.

           

Great Monte and Herriet Alkire. We became more than friends since 2005. Always thinking about me and the school project. They sold their stocks several times to get the funds for KWAUSO. On the brotherly side Monte taught me horse riding and instructed me on the secret to success- “Roping your dream” showing this to be a product of sacrifice, patience, determination, self-confidence, truthfulness and trust. By his own hands he made me a waist belt - the only one I have been using eversince,  while Harriet always stacked her cabinets with Vanilla wafers for me when she sensed I might be visiting because she knew I was fond of them.

The Applebees family organized a town summer sale with articles collected from their friends and volunteers in the neighborhood. All the proceeds were given over for the KWAUSO project.

87. ECHOES OF JUBILANT GRATITUDE TO A RHYTHM OF MUSIC   

 

There are individuals you will meet only once or twice in a life time some accidentally while others providentially; some by planning while others by luck. These will leave behind them some trace of their impact, big or less.  On the journey towards building the school I have come across such people. Some of them have become part of KWAUSO by reason of what they have done or given for bringing KWAUSO where it is and they will remain part of it all the years of its existence. Some have promised a prayer and kept their word while other have done other things. While seeking for support, I travelled short and long distances to meet such people in places like Gulfport and Semiole in Florida, Convington in Kentucky, Cincinnati in Ohio, Riverview and Detroit in Michigan, Pittsburg is Pennsylvania and Bloomfield in Connecticut. I drove where I could or flew when I ought; at times in churches while doing mission appeals or at specially organized events like Preemption in Illinois and so on. To all those I met I extend my gratitude and I pray that God will bless them for the good will and generosity of each one of them.

 

But besides these, there is another category of people who have excelled by their dedication and constancy.  How I wish I could emulate their ethic of faithfulness. I call them caring friends. Some of them know very well from me that I cannot get the right words to express my gratitude to them. I know they care so much and for that reason in their various ways they have always wanted to know how I am doing and how the School is moving. Convinced that what I had started to do was a noble cause, some have offered big sacrifices and shared the fruits of their sweat so generously for the school and for me in order to make sure I will not fail to reach the desired goal for lack of support. Some have taken all the trouble to visit the school and see for themselves the progress of the work they have so decided to support.  Let it suffice to mention some few names of them: Msgr. Paul Showalter, Gregory Folley and family, Philip and Paula Steele and family, Monte and Harriet Alkire and family, Mathew and Tamara Bruno and children, Kris and Rebecca Applebee and children, Fr. John Thieryoung, Frank and Amy Pala and family, Henry and Nancy Acciani,  Emmanuela Marinelli, Salvatore Fiaschi, Wanda Massa, Chiara Molfese Pavan, Maria Grazia Franco and her catechist collaborators at Murelle di Villa Nova of Padua, Sr. Maria Callisthene Metzele,  David Kraft, Raymond and Joy Morland, Agnese Fumaggali, Mario Erba  and many more. Gratitude and immense appreciation for your dedication and endurance. To those who have already preceded us to the other side of life like Doris Hass and Msgr. Roger Corpus, Werner Zimmer and Maria Kurz, I pray that God will reward and grant them eternal joy in heaven.

 

Msgr. Showalter was there when I made my mission appeal to the Church congregation of St. Vincent de Paul in Peoria with full confidence and expectation for a good response after the 21 Pre-K children had surprised me with their $100 dollar gift. This was my first appeal ever. On that day I had good reason to present my case fully confident that the congregation could not let me down. I knew for sure that some members in the congregation were the parents of the children who had given me the seed money to build the school. So, my task was rather easy. I talked to the congregation as if each and everybody present had a child in the Pre-K school and for that reason in a way, I had their money that needed to be boosted by something stronger than what the children had given to make it sufficiently effective. But to make my case tight enough I needed a word from our incoming Parish administrator, who at the same time was the Vicar General. This was given by Msgr. Paul Showalter at each of the 6 weekend masses. Providentially this was the first weekend Msgr. Showalter was reporting as the newly appointed Parish Administrator. So, every time he would introduce himself and then invite the people to kindly listen to what I had to say and then I would present my appeal. At the end, the appeal came out wonderfully successful. I cannot forget thanking him.

 

About each of the friends mentioned above a lot can be said. For the purposes of the present booklet let me say just a little about a few of them. I will start with Gregory Folley the man who witnessed in in person the inauguration of KWAUSO on May 8, 2011 and planted a memorial mango tree at the center of the school campus as an enduring reminder to the pioneer class and serving staff who witnessed the event. These pioneer members of KWAUSO tasted the rough side of founding the school and experienced in their own flesh and the meaning of the saying, “Starting is always difficult”.  But, the name of Gregory comes first on the list not simply because he alone represented all of his good-hearted co-nationals who through their donations brought KWAUSO into existence. Indeed, Gregory gave a lot of his heart and property.  On the day of the inauguration of KWAUSO, as I watched Greg plant the memorial tree at the center of the campus, my thoughts flew back to his homeland and I could see as if standing beside him several great hearts from Illinois whose sheer generosity was visible in its effect, namely the very school infrastructure of unquestionable excellence already in place by that time. He was representing them all.  (Continue at Mark ### of Apendix I, page 109 below). 

 

Boys dance spontaneously in great jubilation at the opening of another dormitory, St. Francis of Assisi.

 88





 

Above: School band plays.

 

Fr. Andrew Bigirwamungu made the KWAUSO  children explode with joy as he sung with them when the dDiocesan clergy coming from their annual retreat at Nyakijooga paid a visit to KWAUSO.

89. VIVA ADRIANA ACUTIS FOR A GEM OF A CHURCH THROUGH YOU

 

1)God’s ways: Viva Adriana Acutis! To you Adriana I extend a very big invitation to join our thanksgiving hymn singing the Lord’s praises. The most recent gem of KWAUSO, our house of prayer, did not come to us from Providence by any other means but through your hands. In a very special way, you are a gift for us from God. He brought you into our project without warning. He used the internet to make us meet. Virtually. You were somewhere in Europe and I was at KWAUSO, and I saw you here, almost like from nowhere and without warning.  You say that you found me on the internet talking about the Shroud of Turin and you were attracted by a phrase that you heard me say in your mother tongue, the Italian language: “Il dopo lo sguardo alla Sindone” where I meant to say KWAUSO  is a sequel of my gaze at the Shroud; a response to my long contemplation of it. God will have put that phrase in my mouth for a purpose which is to connect me to you. You have repeated this in your brief letter dated November 8, 2023 that accompanied the relics of your nephew, Blessed Carlo Acutis for the dedication of our Church. I read: “Il dopo lo sguardo alla Sindone” is of strong inspiration for my work”. God sent you to lift us up like the symbolic lesson on our school Logo which depicts a happy enthusiast lifting someone else to a place of more uplifting experiences.  My interpretation of that unplanned encounter was this: God wanted to support our project – to promote the cause of the Shroud of our Lord - by a means that I could not later claim to result from my efforts, but a gift given to me absolutely gratis. There is an individual who will see behind all that God’s intention to let us feel his almost palpable closeness to us as we strive to fulfil what he wants us to do for our brother in his name. As I look at it again now in retrospect, I see two unknowns (You, Adriana and Me) being brought to meet providentially on that day over the phone to give a stunning answer to one known (the needed house of prayer), that has come to grace KWAUSO, which is “Il dopo lo squardo alla Sindone”.

 

Ironically, a couple of days before we virtually met for the first time on the phone in June, 2022 I had followed on YouTube one recorded conference of Barrie Schwortz, one of the greatest authorities in the field of scientific research about the Shroud of Turin, the man who participated as the official documenting photographer of the STURP team that was privileged to make direct tests on the Shroud for a period of 120 hours round the clock in 1978. At that conference Barrie Schwortz stated one very striking statement that connects my experience with you.  He said, that when God wants you to do his job, he does not tell you beforehand how he is going to use you. He tells you what he wants you to do for him there and then when the time he wants you to work is ripe. I think those words are perfectly correct. This is what I have seen happening between you and KWAUSO. When many years back I started thinking of doing something concrete in the form of a school in response to my perception of the invitation of the Shroud of Turin to try bringing some relief into the life of the Lord’s little ones by doing something for them, I could not have even dreamt that a church, much more beautiful than the limits of my conception, would as soon as this stand at the center of the campus through the hands of a close relative of a recently beatified young man,  Blessed Carlo Acutis. I guess this can be said of you too for I wonder whether even a year earlier you knew that Providence would operate through you to do this for us. The coming together of these experiences is yet in itself another experience that is enough to prompt both of us to kneel before God in silent worship and gratitude.

 

2)Good to thank: The day we spoke for that first time on the phone, both of us being mere strangers to each other, how could I have guessed that shortly later I would realize that Providence was talking to me through you? On that day Providence promised us a gift of computers to our children and we got them. A few days later he brought us a gift of the church, definitely many times more magnificent than anything I had in my dreams since the time I sketched a layout of the buildings of KWAUSO in 2004 (cf. our website: www.kwausoschool.org) without knowing how and when I was going to get the funds to realize it. That is the reason why I want to thank you. May I invite you to join us, the entire community of KWAUSO, full of joy, to thank the Lord with this church, our humble masterpiece for him, in our hands.   Some of the people who saw the building rise up literally from nothing at the beginning of October, 2022 have been telling me that never before had they watched a miracle in the making with their own eyes. They say, in this church they have seen one. On my part as I write these lines today, I find neither reason nor the guts to contradict their opinion. We are not used to seeing churches or halls of this size and beauty rise from start to finish in less than a year.

 

3)When one has the eyes to see: Joy at the completion of such a good work cannot leave us silent about all the people who have toiled to build this church.  I thank the architects, the engineers and all their assistants and collaborators at all levels of expertise and at all stages history has seen us through. None of them got hurt. Not a single one bruised. We pray that the beauty of their handwork will help them enhance the inner goodwill of their hearts decorating their performance in all the other projects they are called to work on anywhere else.

 

4)Amen. Perhaps the best thing we can do is add this: “Amen. O Lord, you have given us this church your Adriana Acutis and done it so well. We know it is yours for us. Teach us to use it in order to glorify you and polish our hearts for you. You know how we desire to heap all bouquet of flowers to you O Lord in thanksgiving for Adriana, your gift to us in the first place who has introduced to us the millennial gift, Blessed Carlo Acutis, by your design her nephew. Please Lord, bless her and her family and keep our eyes open, that we can see you through what you do for us through our fellow human beings. Amen.”


90

 




                 

 

The Church donated by Adriana Acutis in support of KWAUSO project:

 Il dopo lo    sguardo alla Sindone.”

 

                                                          

Adriana Acutis, Aunt of the now Blessed Carlo Acutis.                        Fr. Stanislaus Mutajwaha, Founder of KWAUSO

                                                                                                                                    and current director.

 

 

 

91.EXULTATION TO GOD FOR BRINGING CARLO ACUTIS INTO OUR PROJECT

 1) A gift for children through little children:  It was by God’s inscrutable design that this young man has entered into the history of our project. It is another pat on our shoulders that what is being done is right. Seen through the eyes of faith as it could also be visualized, KWAUSO is a gift of God to us in a very special way. At the very beginning, as the intention of building KWAUSO as a means of promoting the Shroud of Turin and giving honor to the Holy Face of our Lord as depicted on the Shroud approached maturity, I had not a single cent in my pocket for the project. At that time, God sent his little children (aged between around 4 – 5 years) to give me the seed money of $100 (cf. p. 67).  It was a surprise and has remained a reference event in my journey with KWAUSO to engage my later contemplation of the beauty of the very idea of promoting the Shroud and whatever it is here to stand for.  By the offer from those “infants” my mouth was opened and as I made it known to the financially more capable, that we were longing to build a School for our children in Tanzania. And now, after years of hard work and patience, what looked impossible yesterday has become a reality with us. Piece by piece: with an unsolicited help through a sudden intervention of a very close relative of Blessed Carlo Acutis a church just inconceivable three years ago, stands most majestic at the center of our school’s campus. For us it serves as a sign of God’s concern for us as well.

 

2) Who is Blessed Carlo Acutis? Carlo Acutis is a recently beatified young boy who was born to an Italian family that lived in the United Kingdom on May 3, 1991. At a young age he contracted leukemia that finally led to his death on October 12, 2006 after an intensive life of love for Christ. He had special love for the Eucharist and used his excellent ability at the computer as a mass media instrument to write about the eucharistic miracles from all over the world in the history of Christianity and propagate knowledge about them. Ten years after his death his tomb was opened and to the amazement of all, his body was found uncorrupted.  On July 5, 2018 Pope Francis declared him Venerable after a miracle of a healing that was attributed to his intercession was confirmed. Then two years later Carlo Acutis was beatified on October 10, 2020. Just recently another miracle attributed to his intercession was confirmed and the church opened the door for his canonization. As I write these lines the world waits to know the date of the canonization. Most amazing.

 

3)Remote associations of events: I now try to recall where I was during those days. On December 8, 1990, as a student residing at Collegio San Pietro in Rome, I started a private 9-month Novena preparing myself for the climax of my intended pilgrimage to Lourdes in France the following year, on September 8. 1991. The novena entailed a special weekly little act on every Friday. This means, my 9 months’ novena was going on when the baby Carlo Acutis was born.  Interesting enough, Carlo Acutis was born on one of those Fridays. (The date, May 3, 1991 when Carlo Acutis born was a Friday – Blind destiny, of course). I did not know that this was happening.

 

 When the time for the pilgrimage arrived, I was participating in the summer priestly supply program “priesterliche Vertretung” at Griesborn-Schwalbach in the Saarland Region, the Archdiocese of Trier, Germany. I travelled by train from one little town known as Saarlouis over Paris to Lourdes where I arrived some three days before September 8, 1991 the day of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. The feast found me already there. The pilgrimage over, on 9 September I started my journey back by train to the Saarland. At the end of September, I started my journey back from there to Rome.  When we reached the Central Railway Station in Milan, I felt I could not continue my journey to Rome without first going to Turin, the city of the Shroud. So, I took a train that could bring me to Turin. While making my decision to go to Turin, I knew I would not be able to see the Shroud, for I knew it is always kept locked away from the public for security. Yet I decided to go there, all the same. The joy of stepping into the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist and thus be close to the place where the Shroud was kept, would pay for all the trouble of making the diversion of my journey. And it paid.  I went into the Cathedral. I saw the places. Then I visited the Shroud Museum, where I bought some Holy Face Medals, several pictures of the Shroud and a few more souvenirs. That way my desire was fulfilled. After that I took the next train to Milan again and then on to Rome afterwards.

 

4)A reason to meditate: I find it interesting thinking about the sequence of some events at KWAUSO. In the first place I note that the first seed money to build KWAUSO came from the little Pre-School children at St. Vincent de Paul Parish in Peoria. It was a completely unsolicited gift. And now, I find my eyes staring at a beautiful church at the center of the school campus. To me it is like a miracle. There is no doubting that a multipurpose hall, that among other activities could have served as a chapel, was foreseen at this location when I drafted a rough sketch of the school layout of the buildings in the year 2004. But that structure was in no way more real than the castles of the imaginative individuals we have referred to above. Its reality started to form only two years ago when the funds came all unexpected. I attribute its surprising arrival to Blessed Carlo Acutis himself. The whole unfolding makes me think and reflect.  In my failure to understand how it has come about, I once again find myself leaning to the conviction that the Merciful Face of Our Lord to the honor of whom our school is made is tirelessly at work in favor of the work despite all the odds.  It is another pointer to my indebtedness to God himself. Whatever the accuracy of my imagination, at least I can hold one thing beyond challenging, namely, that with this church coming into our hands from a close relative of Blessed Carlo Acutis, KWAUSO  has gained a special intercessor before God. For that reason, I can address my prayer to him as part of this chapter:


92







1)                                                          

2)     Among the many eucharistic miracles Carlo Acutis wrote about is the miracle of Lanciano. The eucharistic bread that miraculously changed into human flesh in ……………. still exists. The Blood Group of the human flesh was determined by scientists to be AB, which is the blood group of the Man in the Shroud.

        

From on high, Blessed Carlo Acutis, turn your eyes on us and help us to thank God for you. God has raised you to the heights. If the whole world is not aware that this was for a reason, at least we do.  You passed from this world going to rest in the vision of the incarnate Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ being a teenager, like the majority of the students being taught and formed in our school, that is dedicated to the honour of His Holy Face as we contemplate the image of his suffering, death and resurrection. You are the right friend of the Eucharistic Christ to carry our prayers of thanksgiving and bring them before his heavenly throne, just as you have brought us His precious gift to us in the form the house of prayer, where after hours of hard work, study and daily duties the members of our community can gather to find rest in him. You so much loved the Eucharist and you dedicated much of your life spreading awareness of the eucharistic miracles, which unfailingly reveal, that behind the visible elements of the consecrated bread and wine, dwell a human species with the same blood type that is invariably determined to be Group AB positive, just like the Man seen in the Shroud. Help us to love the Eucharist as you did. You now dwell in the incomparable bliss of eternity. We ask you to translate our poor and humble adumbrations of thanksgiving into meaningful expressions and present them to him, Our Lord and all. Amen.

93. REVERBERATE A PRAYER FOR OUR SUPPORTERS IN CHORUS   A TUTTI  

 

We are yours Lord and whatever we have is yours. KWAUSO  is yours. You know our intention of building KWAUSO. But we too know that you cared for and loved the weak in a special way. KWAUSO is meant to care for your loved ones whom you called “these little ones of mine”.  You know that it was not in our intention to amass wealth through this school meant to promote your holy selfie, in  the Shroud that today is preserved in Turin.  Do not allow us to turn against our original intention that we believe was acceptable to you. Tell us what to do with KWAUSO that you have given us without our merit.  In return we want to offer you our humble token of gratitude which is: Our combined effort  to remain true to our intention to serve you faithfully in the little ones you place in our care without succumbing to the lure of wealth but thinking of them first before concentrating on satisfying our own needs. That will bring us joy. How we wish that you will accept those efforts, whatever their degree of success, as our hymn of thanksgiving composed by our individual struggles and finally sung in unison for all who have expressed their good will that cannot be gauged by the amount quantifiable donations. This is our chorus a tutti –  to all who have cared.

 

Some of those who cared helped by giving their money or material benefits. Each gave support according to ability and we have built KWAUSO. Others had their prayers and on the foundation of their prayers to the Lord we have built KWAUSO. Many had their physical and others social sufferings which weighed on their shoulders, some for long durations like Frau Maria Kurz,  Sr. Callisthene Metzele and Maria Grazia Franco. They offered their crosses to the Lord as a contribution to the making of KWAUSO. And now KWAUSO thrives on the Lord’s acceptance of their suffering. Others had their dire inability to do anything tangible but, in their heart, they had the strong wish that KWAUSO could stand. Their good wish was their support. Upon that KWAUSO has been founded. While some stood up as individuals, others thought together on how to help. Here I am thinking of families like Philip and Paula Steele of North Henderson who wanted to see my dream fulfilled at any cost even if that meant draining their own resources.  I am thinking of people like Jimmy Costanzo a Knight of Columbus at one Parish in Wickenburg, AZ and his brother Knights of Columbus Council 9838 whom I never met but came to know me through their acquaintances, the enthusiastic promoters of KWAUSO, Monte and Harriet Alkire of Cazenovie of Illinois. To all of them and all the others I have not even mentioned we sound our joyful chorus praying that the Lord will recompense each and every one of them full and ever enduring reward.

 

 94






 

              

       

  

Some names of KWAUSO will remain overhanging the roof covering the bridge connecting the Administration building and the upper floor of the Shroud Replica Shrine for prayerful memory and enduring gratitude.

  

 

95. SING A THANKFUL HYMN TO PROVIDENCE FOR ALL THESE FAVOURS

1) Strike the finale: It is time to strike the finale. Let us conclude our reflections on our gaze at the Shroud with a hymn extolling the greatness and wisdom of divine providence for all his numerous favors including all those we have mentioned in our book as well as those we have not even in any way alluded to. There might be various approaches to doing this. Our choice is focusing our thinking on the miracle of the incarnation that reveals to us the depth of God’s love for us. For it is the event of the incarnation that enables man to see and become immersed in the fullness of the love of the triune God himself. That is the theme of the following song. It is a song we raise to the incarnate word of God who has brought to completion everything that could possibly be done for his creatures.  He became man and dwelt amongst us. Having taught us how to find our way to the Father, Christ “humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even to the death of the cross…” (Phil 2:8). He was buried and He rose from the dead to open for us the gates of heaven.

 

Probably when we say that Jesus rose from the dead a voice from within us whispers that if he rose from the dead then he did what even nature itself would not permit.  And yet, indeed he rose from the dead. In so doing he did what the principles of nature cannot explain. But what is nature before his might? Let it suffice to think of this: During his triumphal entry into the holy city of Jerusalem a few days before his crucifixion and resurrection as groups of his disciples sung in jubilation, praising God at the top of their voices, “Some Pharisees in the crowd said to him, ‘Master, reprove your disciples’, but he answered, ‘I tell you, if these keep silence, the stones will cry out’” which could mean that if his disciples are hindered from acclaiming him, even the elements will unleash a rebellion against nature  itself as well as all the laws that govern it forcing the rocks to shout instead and acclaim him on behalf of his disciples (cf. Lk. 19:39-40). Science cannot say that this is what happened for the formation of the Shroud image. Normally nature does not know how to imprint such sophisticated images of the dead on their shrouds. In this Shroud we see at a glance much of what Our Lord did for humanity and the universe as a whole. Surprising! He did it and rose from the dead. To him we dedicate the song seen below the present paragraph. The song is in Kiswahili with verses arranged in a kind of poetic form. A free translation of it in English follows immediately thereafter.









 96

 





97


 

 


 

     

 

 

 

(Translated in English):

 

What we see of him in the Shroud is this: 

                         

His assignment fullfilled;                  In cross his flag triumphantly waves;

 In death serene his Face;                   Sublime his song: “All prophecies done”

See no beauty of form;                      A victim by choice the guilt is mine.

Pierced by lance his side;                   Vehicle of love; streaming blood and water to flow;

All whip and scourge;                        Incarnate God; crowned with thorns.

Spasm of pain and chill;                     Casting nail in flesh with hammer by force.

Scoff and jeer, mock and spittle;        Torn apart exceeding all shame.

In blood fully drenched;                     Oh  bitter cup he drunk.

On and on to the end;                        Risen Lord my God; the sting of death is dead.

No doubt is right;                              Your Shroud a sign:  You are Who are. 





CONCLUSION

 

We gaze at the Shroud and reason tells us that we are standing in front of a mind-blowing mystery surrounded nevertheless by a mass of formidable evidence that it is more authentic than not. We hold it authentic and our hearts come out enlightened with some inner consciousness that because of it there is a lot we need to thank the Lord for. The believer who had at first instinctively thrown it out as useless for his faith growth is almost humiliated at the discovery that people whose previous history and background would have given them stronger reason to remain dead hard sceptic about Shroud have surprisingly turned into the most vocal defenders of it, impelled by the sheer weight of the scientific evidence and logic before them. This book, not written by a scientist and not meant to attack any scientifically contrary evidence, was an attempt to bring all that to light. Our premises are that it is very difficult to look at the Shroud and look at it again in earnest and then walk away from it unaffected. This is because the Shroud almost acts like the promised sign of Jonah – a challenge to our intelligence.

 

The internationally well-known photographer Barrie Schwortz, for example, was invited to join the team of the STURP researchers who would make the first in-depth scientific examination and study of the Shroud not for anything but because of his professional competence to record on camera what was going to be done by the scientists. They asked him to work as the official documenting photographer for their team.  By the time of his invitation his knowledge of the Shroud was minimal and his interest in the matter was practically nil.  But he went all the same; saw the Shroud and photographed it and did everything he could to facilitate the most sophisticated scientific inquiry in an artifact ever. He was young and free.

 

 In the Shroud this professional photographer of Jewish origin testifies that he was drawn into the study of the Shroud as a purely objective thing. To use his frequent expression, he went into the research about this object “having no horse in the race” in as far as matters of its religious connection are concerned. Ironically, there Schwortz found a Friend (who is the Man of the Shroud) who attracted him to himself so much to the point of making him feel strongly impelled to build up what nowadays has grown into a stunning website called www.shroud.com to promote the awareness and knowledge of the Man in the Shroud to the world. Like St. Paul of Tarsus, his centuries-earlier-conational who started as a persecutor of Christians only to grow into an indefatigable apostle and defender of its Founder. To my ear, the name of Schwortz’ website “shroud.com” subjectively evokes the idea it somehow sounds like, namely “Shroud commitment”.  Seemingly, failing to bury within himself the wonderful truths he has discovered by reason of the privilege he received to be closer to the Shroud than most of us on this planet, Barrie Schwortz has committed himself to telling it to the world in all honesty. That alone is quite stunning.

 

Probably more and more scientists and people of higher learning plus all those who manage to peep beyond the threshold of a distorted knowledge of the Shroud matters will realize the depth and attraction of the truths associated to their gaze on the Shroud. One remains wondering what a world transformation would follow if each one of these would create their own “shroud.com” like models, that is, their individual little life commitments at the inspiration of the Shroud phenomenon in word and deed.

 

The second part of this book has dwelt on such a “Shroud.com”-like model which somewhere has been referred to as an Il dopo lo sguardo alla Sindone in the Italian language or “a Sequel of gazing at the Shroud”. This part has given us the space to thank the Lord for the Shroud and also to thank all men and women from near and far through their generous hands have become part of our “Shroud-com/Shroud commitment” gesture which is KWAUSO  Secondary School.

 

 

When early in the morning on Easter Sunday after Mary Magdalene’s stunning Resurrection news the Apostles Peter and John went to the tomb where Jesus had been buried they found it empty. But they also saw something remarkable. They saw the Shroud that had wrapped Jesus’s body and the other clothes and they believed (Jn 20:..).  We shall probably never know whether they saw the image on the Shroud or no.  But history tells what followed their visit. Convinced that the Lord had really risen from the dead, and coerced by nothing other than something irresistible from within, the Apostles spared nothing for themselves to propagate the news. At the risen Jesus’ gentle mission, the Apostles set out to preach the “magnalia Dei” (i.e. the great works of God) unto all the corners of the world. The Shroud speaks gracefully of the urgency of that to the heart that sees enough sense in it.  Readiness to comply is as a matter of free choice; a question of generous acceptance of the wonderful gift the Master’s love has willed to place into our hands.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX I

 

MORE SYMBOLS AT KWAUSO

 

 

The Shroud is not Jesus Christ. But the Shroud points to him. The Shroud is an icon. It is a symbol that speaks about him. KWAUSO is not the Shroud. But KWAUSO is meant to point to the Shroud. No wonder some of its aspects will be enveloped in symbolism speaking about the story of the Shroud.  Some of these were given on pages 81-82 above.  A continuation follows here.

 

6) Vitality and Enduring Invitation to Contemplate the mystery: At the upper level of the Shroud shrine there stands a triangular prism fitted with large square frames of the three Shroud Face images. The first of these is the positive face of the Man of the Shroud.  The three images are: 1) The shroud image, original appearance – a wonder in its own right.  Experience attests to all that dead bodies do not leave their images on the shrouds used to wrap them. But unlike any other Shrouds in human history the body of this man left the image we can all see.

 

We cannot fail to note that the prism is rotating by the force of the wind which ensures that the mechanism will remain environmentally friendly. The same images are viewed again and again while the text repeatedly goes and comes again. This mechanism goes to underpin the fact that the sign in the Shroud is an enduring invitation to contemplate the mystery of the Lord whose love eludes our thorough comprehension.

 

At balcony level of the Shrine there is a permanently mounted negative image of the face. It overlooks the inner compound of the campus watching day and night all those who dwell in this place.

 

7) Token of Gratitude to Donors and well-wishers:  Overhanging the bridge between the library and the Shroud Shrine are labels of some names of friends of KWAUSO who gave their money to enable the building of KWAUSO. The dangling labels are meant7to remind the visitor and host at KWAUSO in gratitude the great contributions of the named benefactors plus all those whose names are not appearing here. The benefactors who will later get the opportunity of visiting KWAUSO will find their names there to testify their generosity. Should their grandchildren come later they too will find the generosity of their parents prayerfully remembered.

 

(#### Continued from page  87, above)

A lot more could be said concerning the generosity upon which KWAUSO is founded. Without pretending to try to exhaust the list of supporters I think of the couple Philip and Paula Steele for example.  It was the time I was serving between the two Parishes of Monmouth and Aledo under two pastors that I met this couple. My weekly schedule required me to drive 22 miles every Wednesday early morning to say Mass at Viola, an outstation of St. Catharine’s Parish in Aledo, before proceeding to the main Parish station. The couple had attended mass on one of my first Wednesdays at Viola. After Mass, they came to talk to me and invited me to join them at one of the restaurants in town for breakfast. If the Holy Mass could be called the seed of a healthy friendship between individuals,  the one that was celebrated on that day was without a doubt the seed of an enduring friendship since then and the subsequent breakfast a human seal of it. Over the years that friendship has passed through a kind of metamorphosis to a brotherhood such that as the days went by their joy is lived by me and my pains are

 

carried on their shoulders. They would save their money to make sure I did not remain unequipped with sure means of transport to continue the promotion of a service that many people regard a noble cause to the advantage of our children. The Toyota Double-cabin I am driving came from them. They bought it for me as a friend and brother. How can I manage not to think of them in appreciation every single day that goes by?

 

Another giant is Monte Alkire and his wife Harriet.  We met at St. Mary’s Church in Metamora. The journey of friendship started with Monte’s invitation to try horse riding, which I did sort of successfully. He knew my deep desire was to find a way of building the school. He knew how difficult it was to get the funds. He encouraged me never to lose heart and did whatever in his power to help me. He was good at roping and wrote a book on remaining focused on the choice you have made. His way of managing his affairs taught me to ahead resolutely to win the crown. The title of his book “Rope your dream” succinctly summarize his philosophy in these matters. To assist me rope my dream he arranged to take me to a big firm he was once employed with. There he formerly had good acquaintance.  That big firm has a donating foundation. He was optimistic we should be able to get some good assistance from there.  We drove together to the big firm filled with the best optimism. But to the great disappointment of Monte and myself, we came back empty handed. However that never discouraged him to dig deep into his own pockets getting whatever he could find their for a school planned to be built thousands of miles away in a different continent. Or where would I have excavated the dream of seeing him sell stocks and try all sorts of methods to make sure I am not going to fail?

 

Doris Hass, now deceased was another giant. Assisting at one of the Parishes I was assigned to serve, she moved up and down and made telephone calls to the people she knew asking for donations to the School. She was instrumental in my getting the over 100 used computers from one firm for the planned school and through her I got the container that transported the computers from the place they were donated and paid the transportation charges from there to the Port from were the container was exported.

 

I think of Professor Emanuela Marinelli a great Italian sindonologist and Salvatore Fiaschi, Executive Director of Observo Onlus who have tirelessly worked to assist us obtain urgent facilities like the two-in-one family house for our workers and a powerful solar energy plant to alleviate our power needs. I felt greatly honored seeing the world famous Shroud historian Ian Wilson support the project and the researcher Professor Giulio Fanti Professor come up with financial support of our initiative.  These few examples will suffice to throw into relief the depth and breadth of my indebtedness to our KWAUSO supporters. I appreciate their enduring dedication, constancy and unbending determination never to lose heart when good is at stake.

 

8) Centrality of God – Chapel at center of campus: KWAUSO teaches secular subjects just like the normal Secondary Schools in the country. Yet, KWAUSO acknowledges the truth that the key to all proper knowledge is God. Therefore, God is placed at the center of our academic and human formation.  

 

9) Altar: The altar table is supported by three pillars resembling human forms in their knees. Their kneeling posture signifies adoration to the immolated lamb, the altar of sacrifice, which they are seen holding above their heads.  The left hand side figure represents the 2005 Pre-School class children at St. Vincent de Paul Parish in Peoria who gave me the first $100 for this project. The pillar is placed there as a sign of our memorial gratitude for the charitable support they contributed for the building of KWAUSO. The second figure to the right represents all of the KWAUSO alumni who will get their education from KWAUSO.  The central figure represents Blessed Carlo Acutis whose love and dedication to the eucharistic Jesu has and continues to inspire the whole world and whose aunt Adriana by providential design has enabled us to build and complete a magnificent house of prayer within one year. The third figure, to the right represents all the children who have and will go through KWAUSO. These kneel in adoration to Jesus our Lord thanking him for the Shroud and for all that has been done for us in the name of this gift. The figure also represents the determination of KWAUSO community, the past, present and future to emulate the generosity that produced KWAUSO as well as the call to always do to others, especially the more needy to the honor Jesus, the Lord of all tender love and care.

 

10) Preparedness: Someone looks at the chapel, located at the center of the school campus and makes a reflection about its shape and positioning and a picture strikes the mind. The chapel looks like a plane ready for takeoff. The destination of the vehicle remains a matter of the observer’s conjecture. But the best guess is the right answer in this case. The Church’s architecture is a constant reminder that all those over whom the chapel extends its roof ought to be ever ready for departure every moment under the awareness that the ultimate journey prepared for all in the flesh is always imminent but at the end of it a loving welcome into the blessed house of the eternal Father awaits them.

 

12) Blessing: The cubic prism mounted at a higher lever in the porch of the Chapel is fitted with four square frames each holding the Holy Face (from the Shroud and the divine Mercy image. The prism rotates in the wind to symbolize the constant blessing of our Lord to the visitors and the inhabitants of KWAUSO evoking the papal special blessing to the people in the city of Rome and all those beyond it which is called “urbi et orbi”. It represents our prayer that the Lord will bless KWAUSO inhabitants and not only the inhabitants but also its neighbors and visitors.

 

                                                                                                            

APPENDIX II

 

A Passing Turbulence in Flight

Nine years after my first book on the Shroud, I wrote another one giving it the title: ZAWADI-KUMBUKUMBU: SAND YA TORINO.  (A Memorial Gift: The Shroud of Turin).  I wanted to express my acknowledgement that that in the face of the huge mass of data that has been accumulating in the various fields of research the Shroud is here to stand as a precious gift which anybody could even reasonably accept as a Souvenir of the Lord’s greatest act of love for humanity. In other words, by the time I embarked on writing this book I regarded the Shroud authentic.  Ironically, it was while working on the final touches of this book for publication that, to my way of looking at things, something of lasting memory happened to me. What happened was completely noiseless, personal and private but it would require a heart many times harder than mine to resist its implications and keep on entertaining doubts about the authenticity of the Shroud. The experience was like a mallet lightly yet firmly dislodging me out of my yet remaining reservations concerning this matter. To me that experience was like a moment of a passing but strong turbulence in flight that reminds the casual passenger on board that while enjoying the comfort of floating in midair the empty of all is kept in balance by forces of which the individual passenger does not have absolute knowledge or control: To the individual, a call to humility.

This is what happened:

On Tuesday before Palm Sunday of 2002 during the evening hours I was proofreading the draft of that book, inserting relevant amendments here and making corrections there. My intention in writing this book had been to produce something that could bring out the point that the Shroud is a message bearer where, to use  an expression of the physicist Blaise Paschal regarding some spiritual truths, there is enough light to see for anybody who wants to accept the message but there is sufficient darkness for those who do not like to see to remain in their darkness: “In faith there is enough light for those who want to believe and enough shadows to blind those who don’t”). I planned my book in such a way that it would be easy for anybody who wanted to see what is hidden within its pages but it would be very difficult to see for somebody else who was not keen enough to be prompted by the obvious indicators of what is hidden. I called my plan and presentation “An Argument from the open secret” (WHICH IS A KIND OF PLAY WITH INCONGRUENT WORDS: “OPEN AND SECRET”. WHAT IS OPEN CANNOT BE AT THE SAME TIME A SECRET NEITHER CAN A SECRECT BE AN OPEN TRUTH AT THE SAME TIME).   In the introduction I alerted the reader that the book could best be approached as “A Poem to the Crucified One and A song to the Risen Lord”.  I had made my mind to write the book after reaching a personal conviction that, whatever the position of the experts and other opinion makers the Shroud speaks about none other than Our Lord.

 Now, it happened that, reviewing what I had written and seeing what I had come out with, that evening I felt a kind of inner satisfaction that I had done something good to illustrate my case. My heart felt uplifted with the joy that we all experience after we have achieved something that, by our own standards we regard good. My usual time to retire approached and I was feeling ready to go to bed. Meantime I knew that in the afternoon of the upcoming Sunday (Palm Sunday of 2002) I would start my journey to Entebbe in Uganda to make sure that the final draft of my book was in the hands of the printers at Kisubi by Good Friday, ready for printing.

It was in that mood that I knelt down to say my night prayers and call it a day. But no sooner had I started the prayers than I became invaded by a strange series of unwanted distractions. My mind took me back to the draft of my book and dwelt for an instant on the index of the songs I had placed at the end of the book in order to underline my argument of the Shroud as “an open secret”: a free gift that attracts gently by its beauty enhanced by the touch of love of the one about whom it is meant to give a truthful report.  The list of the songs was written in such a way that, read together at a glance, the initials of the first words of their titles produced a good sentence. (Besides, the verses of the songs themselves had been arranged to give meaning when read together at a glance). It had been done that way to establish my premises to the argument that looking at the Shroud properly we can discover that it is meant to graciously compel the generous heart to welcome it without the pressure of chains around the neck as a bearer of a sublime message. The language of the Shroud is a kind of a humorous “Reveal and Hide game” whereby the inner facts about it become candid to those who are willing to open their eyes, while remaining hidden from every other person who, for lack of the required generosity fails to open the eyes to see the obvious. For the sake of generosity, I placed the first hint to the “code” of the secret on the very first page of the book involving the initials of the first words of the three paragraphs, namely “USO” big, capitalized, bold and colored. This was purposely set to avoid making it too difficult for my reader to get to the point immediately. There were three paragraphs on each page.

 

 

 

U

 This was the initial of the first word, the first paragraph on the first page

 S

 The initial of the first word, the second paragraph, first page

O

The initial of the first word, third paragraph, first page.

Placed and read together in table form these initials of the first words of the three paragraphs produced one Kiswahili word: “USO” which means “FACE”. The word “USO” was used as the main title of my first book on the Shroud in the Kiswahili language, the year 1994.  

U

S

O


It goes on the same way as we proceed to the next pages. So, the initials of the first words of the three paragraphs on page two, and then the initials of the first words of the three paragraphs on page three. Placed in table form in colored boxes, capitalized, big and bold will look like this

U

S

O

S

A

D

[H1] [H2] O

N

Y

The difference is that the vertical sets of the initials on the after the first set do not produce any meaningful words. This shows that the idea of meaning suggested by the first set of the vertical initials does not surface again in all of the remaining sets of initials through page 80. Absence in all the following sets does not encourage the reader to dwell on the hypothesis that there could be any meaningfulness in the arrangement of the letters. It somehow looks a mere jumble of capitalized and colored letters. Normally that is what the casual reader will pick as the reading goes on page after page.

But at the end of the 80 pages, I put all the vertical sets of letters together in table form. Then the perception changes completely.  Viewed at a glance in table arrangement it is so clear that together the initials are forming complete words which are connected together appropriately to produce meaningful sentences. The letters are no longer a meaningless jumble but appropriate elements of three complete sentences. That is not so evident when each letter is read alone on a different page in the book. And that is where the “Reveal and Hide” game argument of the Shroud comes in.

Put together in table form the sets of all the initials of the first words of all the three paragraphs on each page looked like this: Note:  The uppermost row (1) shows the page number; the second (2) row are the initials of the captions of the pictures, each for each page; then the third (3) row are the initials of the first word of the first words of the paragraphs; the fourth (4) row are the initials of the first words of the second paragraphs and the fifth (5) are the initials of  the first words of the third paragraphs.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

@

!

$

@

)

*

&

#

&

$

&

!

)

(

+

#

!

!

¥

µ

*

!

#

#

$

(

&

π

µ

#

(

β

÷

+

~

U

S

O

M

T

A

K

A

T

I

F

U

U

L

I

O

J

E

R

U

H

I

W

A

V

I

B

A

Y

A

K

W

A

D

H

A

M

B

I

Z

S

A

D

A

K

A

T

A

K

A

T

I

F

U

I

S

I

Y

O

N

A

D

O

A

I

L

I

Y

O

T

O

L

E

W

A

M

S

A

L

A

O

N

Y

E

S

H

O

B

O

R

A

K

A

B

I

S

A

L

A

U

P

E

N

D

O

U

S

I

O

P

I

M

I

K

A

W

A

B

A

B

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

 

6

7

8

9

0

¢

¢

&

#

±

§

?

/

§

!

=

)

)

@

¡

¥

!

!

!

¬

π

#

}

¿

β

«

Ö

«

#

}

#

*

¤

¥

E

T

U

S

I

S

I

N

A

K

U

D

H

A

R

A

U

L

I

W

A

S

A

N

A

B

W

A

N

A

U

T

U

H

U

R

U

M

I

E

B

A

N

I

K

W

A

W

O

K

O

V

U

W

A

U

L

I

M

W

E

N

G

U

K

R

I

S

T

U

U

T

U

H

U

R

U

M

I

E

B

W

A

M

I

L

E

L

E

N

A

M

P

A

T

A

N

I

S

H

I

W

E

T

U

B

W

A

N

A

U

T

U

H

U

R

U

M

I

E

3) O Holy face terribly wounded by our sins and very much depreciated: Lord, Have mercy on us).

4) Pure and unblemished sacrifice offered in the cross for the salvation of the world: Christ, Have mercy on us).

5) Most excellent revelation of love unfathomable of the eternal Father and our conciliation: Lord, Have mercy on us).  

This is what I was looking at with a feeling of satisfaction that evening. But then I noticed that there was something important still missing that needed be introduced. Each of the 80 pages was headed with a caption followed by one or two relevant pictures. The new thought required me to pay attention to the initials of these captions as well in order to match the logic of my planned reveal and hide argument. The captions were exactly 80, because I had fixed 80 pages for the pictures involved in my Reveal and Hide premise section, as indicated in the table of the initials above. Until that evening the captions to the pictures were already there.  But there was not any intelligible consequence between them. Compared to initials of the three paragraphs the initials of the captions appeared to me like an indeterminate jumble of letters without any meaning. I felt strongly this had to be changed.  So, a chain of improvement ideas continued bombarding my mind. 1) Suppose these eighty initials of the captions spanning 80 the pages involving the premise part of my argument, were determined in such a way that, read together serially a meaningful sentence or clause should come out? This was followed by another idea of improvement: 2) But then suppose the sentence/clause thereof created expressed a meaning consistent with the general enquiry of the Shroud? Then again, another idea of refinement: 3) Furthermore suppose the meaning of that sentence or clause turned around the suffering, death and resurrection of Jesus, which is the specific message of the book? Then finally another idea forced itself in as a last challenge: 4) But suppose that sentence or clause, meeting all the content and statistical conditions were taken from this bible sitting here on my table (meaning the Kiswahili Bible of the version “BIBLIA TAKATIFU” that I had been using for the biblical quotations in the entire book) and used without doing the slightest modification or adjustment? All of the conditions appeared  good and practicable but this last one sounded like impossible, though carrying with it the most excellent consequence if it were to work.

To my imagination, the chances of hitting at such a sentence/clause looked exceedingly improbable (almost impossible); but I persuaded myself to think positive and go ahead against all the odds.  My brain seemed like turning upside down when I again thought that the required clause must speak about the suffering, death and resurrection of Jesus, and must come from this Bible here (not any translation) and must be composed of 80 characters (not even a single character more and not less). In the face of this task that I had created for myself, but now not willing to abandon, I said a short prayer for the most improbable. The pressure of the moment was high and there seemed to be no freedom to think of abandoning it without first trying to pursue it. So, I uttered the prayer, short and unambiguous, as it came; “My Lord Jesus, if you give me a fitting sentence or clause from this Bible here fulfilling all the conditions set by these unchangeable circumstances, I shall call what I get “your local contribution to the work I have been doing for you in writing this book”.

I then concluded my night prayers and immediately started working on my task. Rare joy ceased me when I opened the Bible, searched for the sentence/clause and got one. A perfect find. The meaning was correct. Coherence between the sentence and the sense of the book was perfect. To make sure that what I got was statistically the right thing needed, I counted the letters with my finger, one after the other and the count was 80. I counted the second time the same method and the number 80 was confirmed. For cross-checking I drew a box table, inserted the letters of my sentence into the boxes as a kindergarten kid would and did the recounting. Again, the count was 80. But that made me doubt my accuracy all the more. I was not sure of myself. I opened my laptop to cross-check using the best tool I had with me. So, I copied the sentence to my laptop and commanded the machine to do the counting for me. The number came: 80 characters forming the sentence. I erased the sentence from my laptop and recopied the sentence. Still the reading was 80. I was forced to accept the facts.  The sentence I was looking for was surely here. But still more enthralling, the sentence I had hit was like a direct report of the words coming from our Lord himself.

There and then I was seized with an intense sense of unworthiness at receiving his unquestionable “local contribution”. In a second, I saw a torrent of tears spontaneously flow from my eyes for joy and gratitude within those circumstances.  I was alone. There was nobody around to help me overcome that flow of tears. The sentence was from (Lk 24:7) Imempasa Mwana wa Adamu kutiwa mikononi mwa wenye dhambi na kusulibiwa na kufufuka siku ya tatu.” (Its English translation according to The New Jerusalem Bible reads: “The Son of man was destined to be handed over into the power of sinful men and be crucified, and rise again on the third day”. All I needed to do after that was replace the jumbled initials of the captions already there with those of the letters composing the biblical sentence.  They would later be used as the initials of the first words of the 80 captions.  

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

I

M

E

M

P

A

S

A

M

W

A

N

A

W

A

A

D

A

M

U

K

U

T

I

W

A

M

I

K

O

N

O

N

I

M

W

A

W

E

N

U

S

O

M

T

A

K

A

T

I

F

U

U

L

I

O

J

E

R

U

H

I

W

A

V

I

B

A

Y

A

K

W

A

D

H

A

M

B

I

Z

S

A

D

A

K

A

T

A

K

A

T

I

F

U

I

S

I

Y

O

N

A

D

O

A

I

L

I

Y

O

T

O

L

E

W

A

M

S

A

L

A

O

N

Y

E

S

H

O

B

O

R

A

K

A

B

I

S

A

L

A

U

P

E

N

D

O

U

S

I

O

P

I

M

I

K

A

W

A

B

A

B

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

 

6

7

8

9

0

Y

E

D

H

A

M

B

I

N

A

K

U

S

U

L

I

B

I

W

A

N

A

K

U

F

U

F

U

K

A

S

I

K

U

Y

A

T

A

T

U

E

T

U

S

I

S

I

N

A

K

U

D

H

A

R

A

U

L

I

W

A

S

A

N

A

B

W

A

N

A

U

T

U

H

U

R

U

M

I

E

B

A

N

I

K

W

A

W

O

K

O

V

U

W

A

U

L

I

M

W

E

N

G

U

K

R

I

S

T

U

U

T

U

H

U

R

U

M

I

E

B

W

A

M

I

L

E

L

E

N

A

M

P

A

T

A

N

I

S

H

I

W

E

T

U

B

W

A

N

A

U

T

U

H

U

R

U

M

I

E

 

At the subjective level, the impact of this experience was exceedingly profound. Very profound.  I knew that what I had done was not scientific. And I cannot advise anybody how to repeat that in any other similar situation. But I am consoled that, after all, I was not doing science.  I may compare my experience with a moment of a passing turbulence in flight, that momentarily reminds the casual passenger on board, that there are forces operating out there of which we are not always conscious as life goes on. Probably it was like a gentle whisper meant to alert me that while we handle matters concerning the Shroud we may need to be aware that we are dealing with things of sublime dignity and import.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.    Books

Barbessino, Francesco e Moroni, Mario, L’ordalia del Carbonio 14, Mimep-Docente, Pessano 1995.

Barbet, Pierre, A Doctor at Calvary, New York 1953.The Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ, tr. The Earl of Wiclow,  Clonmore & Reynolds,  Dublin 1954

Bollone, Baima,  P., Alla ricerca delll’uomo della Sindone,  Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milano 1978.

______________, Sindone o no, Societa’ Editrice Internazionale, Torino 1990.

Bowman, Sheridan, Radiocarbon Dating, British Museum Publications, London 1990.

Bruce, Ray and Wilson, Ian, Jesus and the Shroud, Holt, Rinehart and Winston Ltd, Eastbourne 1984.

Danin, Avinoam, Alan D Whanger, Uri Baruch and Mary Whanger, Flora of the Shroud of Turin, Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis 1999.

Garello, Edoardo, La Sindone e i  papi, Corsi, Torino 1984.

Ghiberti, Giuseppe, La spoltura di Gesu’ I Vangeli e la Sindone, Marietti, Roma 1982.

________________, Sindone le Immagini, Editrice ODPF, Torino 2002.

Habermas, Gary, The Resurrection of Jesus: A Rational Inquiry, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor 1976.

Humber, Thomas, La santa Sindone, Mursia, Milano 1978.

Intrigillo, Gaetano, La Sindone: dopo la datazione con il radio carbonio, Edizioni Dehoniane, Roma 1990.

Jennings, Peter (ed.), Face to Face with the Turin Shroud, Mowbray, Oxford 1978.

Lavoie, Gilbert R., Unlocking the Secrets of the Shroud, Thomas More, Allen Texas 1998.

______________, The Shroud of Jesus, Sophia Institute Press, Manchester, USA 2023.

Libby, Willard, Radiocarbon Dating, Chicago University Press, Chicago 1952.

Marinelli, Emanuela, La Sindone, un’immagine <impossibile>, Edizioni san Paolo, Milano 1996.

_______________, FASOL Marco, Luce dal sepolcro,  Fede e Cultura, Verona 2015.

_______________, FALSO Marco, Light from the Sepulcher, Gondolin Press, Fort Collins (USA)                                  2017.

_______________, REPICE Domenico, Via Sindonis, La Passione di Cristo documentata dal Sacro

                               Lino,  Edizioni Ares, Milano 2022.

______________ (a cura di), Nuova luce sulla Sindone, Edizioni Ares, Milano 2024.  

Moretto, Gino, The Shroud: A Guide, (Translation by Alan Naeme), St. Paul’s Publishers, Torino 1998.

Nickell, J., Inquest on the Shroud of Turin, Prometheus Books, New York 1983.

Petrosillo, Orazio, La Sindone. Un enigma alla prova della scienza, 2a Edizione Rizzolim Milano 1990.

Pfeiffer, Henrich, L’immagine di Cristo nell’arte, Citta’ Nuova, Roma 1986.

Ricci, Giulio, L’uomo della Sindone e’ Gesu’, Cammino, Roma 1986.

Riggi, Giovanni, Rapporto Sindone 1978-1982, Il piccolo Torino 1982.

Rinaldi, Peter, I Saw the Shroud. A Study of the Shroud of Christ, Don Bosco, New York 1982.

_______________, When Millions Saw the Shroud, Don Bosco Publications, New York. 1979.

Rodante, Sebastiono, Le realta’ della Sindone, Massimo, Milano 1987.

_______________, (curatore), La Sindone, Indagini scientifiche, Edizione Paoline, Torino 1988.

Savio, Pietro, Ricerche sul tessuto della santa Sindone, Tip. S. Nilo, Grottaferrata (Roma) 1973.

Siliato, Maria Grazia, Sindone:Mistero dell’impronta di duemila anni fa, Edizioni Piemme, Casale Monferrato 1997.

Stevenson, Kenneth and Habermas, Garry, Verdict on the Shroud: Evidence for the Death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ, Servant, Michigan 1881.

Stroud, William, The Physical Cause of the Death of Christ, Hamilton Adams, London 1981.

Timossi, Virginio, La santa Sindone nella sua costituzione tessile, L.I.C.E, Torino 1933.

Vignon, Paul, The Shroud of Christ, New Hyde Park, University Books 1970

Waldstein, Wolfgang, Neueste Erkenntinisse uber Turiner Grabtuch: Auch Atoforschun erweist Echtheit, Christiana-Verlag, Stein am Rhein 1977.

Wilcox, Robert, The Truth about the Shroud of Turin,

Wilson, Ian, The Shroud of Turin. The Burial Cloth of Jesus Christ?, 2nd edition, Doubleday, New York 1991.

_______________, The Mysterious Shroud, Doubleday & Co., New York 1986.

_______________, Holy Faces, Secret Places: An Amazing Quest for the Face of Jesus’s True Likeness,  Doubleday, London 1991.

______________, The Blood and the Shroud, Weidenfeld & Nicolson,  London 1998.

______________, The Shroud: Fresh Light on the 2000-Year-Old Mystery, Bentam Books, London                         2010.        

 

Zaccone, Gian Maria, (Curatore), L’immagine rivelata, Centro Studi Piermontesi, Torino 1998.

Zaninotto, Gino, La tecnica della crocificazione romana, Quaderni di studi sindonici Emmaus, 2, Roma 1982.

Zehetbauer, Markus, Jesus? Die Ergebnisse der Grabtuchforschung, Kirmair Druck, Munchen 1986.

 

 

2.    Articles

 

Marinelli, Emanuela, “La questione dei pollini trovati sulla Sindon”, Il giornale delle prove non distruttive, anno X n. 1, Maggio 1989.

 

Meacham, William, “On Carbon Dating and the Turin Shroud”, Shroud Spectrum International, No. 19, June 1986 pp. 15-25.

 

Rinaldi, Peter, “Humbert II of Savoy 1904-1983”, in Shroud Spectrum International, 7, June 1983, pp.2-5.

 

Tessore, Giorgio, “Cognoscere la Sindone – La Figura di Cristo e la Sindone nell’Iconografia”, Collegamento Pro Sindone, March/April 1988, pp. 26-36.

 

Tyrer, John, “Is it Really a Fake?”, in Textile Horizons, March 1989, pp. 51-52.

 

Vikan, Gary, “Debunking the Shroud: Made by Human Hands”, in Biblical Archaeology Review, July/August 1998, pp. 27-9

 

3.    Online sources:

The most exhaustive information about the Shroud of Turin can be found on the website of Barrie Schwortz at https://www.shroud.com

 

The Second most reliable on line source is the pdf Academia website by Marino, Joe.

 


 [H1]

 [H2]








1. Huyu kakamilisha yake kazi….........Benderaye kapeperusha mtini;
   Uso wake mtulivu kwa ushindi..….. Wimbo wake “Nimetimiza tabiri!”   
 2.   Yeye hana umbo wala uzuri…….Amepigwa kwa sababu ya  wadhambi;
      Ubavu wake kachomwa ni mkuki......Na mara kukatoka damu  na maji;
      3.    Ni mingi mijeledi wote mwili………Alivikwa taji  miiba kichwani;
                Ililia nyundo na misumari…………Watesi wakimfungia msalabani.
        4. Ni dhihaka ni mate ni matusi........Akibebeshwa msalaba kwa kejeli;
Alitokwa jasho-damu awali……....…Na mieleka si michache njiani.
5. Naye kishateswa hata kifoni………Ghilibu ya mauti kwake batili;
Imeachwa kumbukumbu pichani……..Ushuhuda wa pendole na zawadi.


4) Audio-visual statement in Italian concerning  the centrality of Shroud of Turin for this project.


Knowing us  Works    Activities   Utilities    Support us   Others


5) KWAUSO School logo explained.


Meaning of the School Logo:

The context of the project is Africa. Someone is struggling to rise. Another person who cares wants to help.  Standing at the top this caring person extends their hand in the intention to reach out to the other in order to help them rise. The effort to do that is expressed in the form of Education which Kwauso School will provide. For that reason the person who is struggling to come up has their leg supported by KWAUSO. One notes also that both of these individuals are emotionally satisfied at the thought of their readiness  to serve. The words, "Yes, I would love to Serve" unite them: The one on top is happy to be rendering his service while the other one struggles to rise in order to acquire a greater ability to serve his/her brethren. 


 Hallway to the Administration Building, March 2014

5) KWAUSO School song
i) Lyrics.

KWAUSO OUR ALMA MATER  (Fr. Stan Mutajwaha)

Solo: KWAUSO, KWAUSO our Alma Mater, you fill my heart with wonder. x 2
          Well, I shall sing your praises today and ever. x 2

Choir: 1) Songs and poems, lyric and dances just mere tokens;
          Lo! Alma Mater KWAUSO, what gift to give?
          Cross all oceans, search the planet, none you’d find;
          None anywhere like KWAUSO, our thirst to quench.
         
All:    Once a dream and now no longer,
          But so real and true: KWAUSO School.
          Thanks a thousand times Alma Mater,
          For us it’s a wonder KWAUSO School.

Choir: Oh truly it’s a wonder.
All:    KWAUSO is a wonder.
Choir: The key to our future.
All:    KWAUSO is wonder.

All:    Once a dream and now no longer,
          But so real and true: KWAUSO School.
          Thanks a thousand times Alma Mater,
          For us it’s a wonder KWAUSO School.

Choir: 2) Home for learning, Center of working, Cause amazing;
          Our Alma Mater, KWAUSO: Hold us. Teach us.
          Form our thinking; Polish our longing; Give us wisdom;
          Joy radiating, virtue and hope always to bring.

Choir 3) God our Maker, Giver of talents, bless our efforts;
          Inspire all at KWAUSO, the Truth to seek.
          End of knowing, guide our purpose, shape our going;
          Make us one, to strive as one: KWAUSO is one.

Choir: 4) On our part we shall work hard and learn non-stopping;
     When time comes to serve others we shall serve well.
     So our lives shall be consistent with “KWAUSO”,
     We know well that KWAUSO calls us to serve.

All: Once a dream and now no longer…

All:    KWAUSO, KWAUSO our Alma Mater, you fill my heart with wonder x 2
          Well, I shall sing your praises today and ever x 4 


5) KWAUSO School song:The music

Knowing us  Works    Activities   Utilities    Support us   Others

5) KWAUSO School song: Instrumental.